Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2015
Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2015-0095, written 12 Mar 2015. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.
| Date of report | 12 Mar 2015 |
|---|---|
| Reference | 2015-0095 |
| Deceased | Nicola Tweedy |
| Coroner | Jacqueline Lake |
| Coroner area | Norfolk |
| Category | Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths |
| Organisation named | Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust |
| Source | judiciary.uk record · original PDF |
| Responses published | 2 |
Text recovered by OCR from a scanned PDF. OCR is imperfect: check anything you rely on against the source PDF. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.
REGULATION 28: REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: The Chief Executive Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust Trust Headquarters Hellesdon Hospital Drayton High Road Norwich NR6 5BE 1 | CORONER | am JACQUELINE LAKE, Senior Coroner, for the coroner area of NORFOLK | 2 | CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS | | make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. 3 | INVESTIGATION and INQUEST : : ‘ On 31 March 2014 | commenced an investigation into the death of NICOLA ANNE TWEEDY, AGE, 54 YEARS. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 3 MARCH 2015.’ The conclusion of the inquest was medical cause of death: 1a) Pulmonary Embolism b) recent varicose vein surgery and narrative conclusion: Mrs Tweedy died following a rare but recognised risk of appropriate surgery. 4 | CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH : Mrs Tweedy was admitted to NNUH for elective varicose vein surgery as a Day Case patient on 27 March 2014, having seen the Consultant Surgeon on 26 November 2013 — and had a pre-operation assessment on 18 March 2014. There was no evidence that Mrs Tweedy had been handed leaflets regarding the procedure and its risks. The Risk Assessment form for Thromboprophylaxis was not completed as indicated at this time. Despite this being noted immediately prior to the procedure, the Risk Assessment form was never completed. Mrs Tweedy was administered a single dose of prophylaxis. Following review of data and procedures, NNUH have noted that varicose vein surgery does show an increased risk of DVT relative to other Day Case procedures. It has now been decided to routinely prescribe 5 days of thromboprophylaxis to all patients undergoing varicose vein surgery unless there are contra-indications. Following the procedure Mrs Tweedy was faken to the Recovery Ward where she was deemed ‘appropriate for. Nurse led discharge. Notes were made by a Nurse recording she had passed urine and eaten supper. Before discharge, a Patient is required to be shown to have eaten and had a drink, passed urine, is able to get up and walk, not feel nauseous, had adequate pain relief and understood instructions for care following discharge: A checklist form for completion on discharge had not been completed. EEE raised concerns that his wife was not fit for discharge with a Nurse (it may well have been to a different Nurse) in that she had only walked 10 — 15 paces and left in a wheelchair. On 29 March 2014, Mrs Tweedy was found collapsed and died at her home. 5. | CORONER’S CONCERNS During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action is taken. In the . circumstances itis my statutory duty to report to you. The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows. — (1)- Specific leaflets relating to the procedure and aftercare were not handed to the patient. It is understood a “tick box” has now been added to documentation recording that this is done. This will only work if forms are properly and timely completed — see below. It is understood training and auditing of forms is now in place, but it is not clear how this is being carried out. (2) The Thromboprophylaxis Risk Assessment form was not completed at any point throughout Mrs Tweedy’s dealings with the hospital. Had the Risk Assessment been completed this would have flagged up specific risk factors relating to Mrs Tweedy well’ before the operation. It was noted the Risk Assessment had not been completed following Mrs Tweedy being anaesthetised and this did start discussion between the Consultant Surgeon overseeing the procedure and the Anaesthetist about the risk factors and action to be taken. However, at this stage in the procedure, it did not allow for a full and proper consideration of the relevant information early on when- proper thought could have been given to the risks and potential risks. (3) Nursing notes on discharge did not fully cover all the factors required to be checked before a patient is discharged. (4) There was no evidence that the Nurse completing the notes had actually seen Mrs Tweedy prior to discharge. (5) The checklist Form for completion on discharge was not completed. ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and | believe your organisation has the power to take such action. YOUR RESPONSE You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, namely by 7 May 2015. |, the coroner, may extend the period. Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed. COPIES and PUBLICATION | have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested Person: BEE (bsbanc) | have afso sent it to The Department of Health who may find it useful or of interest. lam also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response. The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form. He may send a copy of this report. to any person who he believes may find it useful or of interest. You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response, about the release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner. DATE: 12 March 2015 0 po Jacqueline Lake Senior Coroner for Norfolk
2 responses published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.
Chief Operating Officer Richmond House 79 Whitehall London SW1A 2NS Ms J Lake Senior Coroner Coroner’s Court 69-75 Thorpe Road Norwich Norfolk NR1 1UA 11 May 2015 Dear Ms Lake Thank you for providing the Department with a copy of your Regulation 28 Report following the inquest into the death of Nicola Tweedy. I was very sorry to hear of Mrs Tweedy’s death and wish to extend my sincere condolences to her family. I understand that you found that Mrs Tweedy died following a rare but recognised risk of surgery for varicose veins. You draw attention to several serious issues that arose during Mrs Tweedy’s stay in hospital which, if addressed, could prevent future deaths from occurring. I note that you have sent your report to the Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust. My officials have liaised with the Foundation Trust about your report and I understand that it has fully considered and responded to each of your concerns relating to the care of Mrs Tweedy. I can report that a recent independent external inspection found that the Foundation Trust had implemented an Action Plan, to address the issues raised by this case, and that this demonstrated that learning and improvement had taken place. I am aware that you sent our Department a copy of your report for interest and were not expecting a direct response. Nevertheless, I would like to take this opportunity to respond to some of the issues that your report raises. I have sought views from officials at NHS England to enable me to do this. The Department is aware of the importance of reducing the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in hospital patients and the need for all nurses and health care assistants to understand VTE prevention procedures, and the reasons for these procedures. This is why the Department recommends use of a risk assessment checklist and published a VTE risk assessment tool in 2010: http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20130107105354/http://www.dh.gov.uk/prod_consu m_dh/groups/dh_digitalassets/@dh/@en/@ps/documents/digitalasset/dh_113355.pdf This tool helps to ensure that assessments take place for every patient, and that results are closely monitored in order to reduce preventable deaths from VTE. In addition, The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) published guidelines in 2010, Venous thromboembolism: reducing the risk. Clinical guideline 92, which offers best practice advice on reducing the risk of VTE in patients admitted to hospital. The guidelines recommend that all patients, including those admitted for day medical or surgical procedures should be individually assessed for risk of VTE and that the risks and benefits of prophylaxis should be discussed with the patient. VTE prevention has been recognised as a clinical priority for the NHS by the National Quality Board and the NHS Leadership Team. It has been identified as the most important patient safety practice in our hospitals, and VTE-specific indicators feature in both the NHS Outcomes Framework and the Clinical Commissioning Group Outcomes Indicator Set. NHS commissioners are required to undertake root cause analysis of all cases of hospital- acquired VTE, in line with the National CQUIN (Commissioning for Quality and Innovation) goal 2013/14, to enable commissioners to address gaps in service provision. There are a number of levers available to commissioners to ensure that their providers’ maintain patient safety practices in relation to VTE prevention. First and foremost, local commissioners should make certain that they fully utilise the provider payment incentives provided by the national VTE CQUIN Goal 2013/14. There are two indicators that must be met in order to qualify for a single provider payment:- 1) Proportion of all adult inpatients that have been assessed for risk of VTE on admission to hospital must be at least 95%. The commissioners can access quarterly data on the number and proportion of VTE risk assessments carried out by providers and can withhold payment if the threshold is not met; and 2) Root cause analysis should be carried out on all cases of hospital-acquired VTE. The proportion of cases subject to root cause analysis necessary to trigger the CQUIN payment is to be determined locally. The National VTE Prevention Programme (http://www.vteprevention-nhsengland.org.uk/) publishes data, from NHS England's data collection, on the number of inpatients admitted monthly that have been risk assessed for VTE on admission to hospital, using the criteria in the National VTE Risk Assessment Tool. Data for VTE Risk Assessment Quarter 4, 2013/14 (January to March 2014) (revised July 2014), shows that the Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, risk- assessed 98.29% of admitted patients for VTE in March 2014. As a result of this case NHS England has agreed to look at the potential for national learning at the next meeting of the VTE Programme Board. NHS England has also been in direct contact with to reaffirm its commitment to doing everything it can to prevent hospital- associated thrombosis, through the efforts of the National VTE Prevention Programme. It will also update as national initiatives progress. Lastly, as some of the actions of medical and nursing staff are subject to criticism in your report, I wish to take this opportunity to remind you of the role of the professional regulatory bodies and their fitness-to-practise processes. As you may be aware, Doctors must register with the General Medical Council (GMC) and Nurses must register with the Nursing and Midwifery Council (NMC) and meet set professional standards to work in the UK and be fit for practise. If an allegation is made about a registrant, who may not meet the professional standards required in the UK, the relevant regulatory body has a duty to investigate and, where necessary, take action to safeguard the health and well-being of the public. The Department cannot get involved with or comment on individual cases. I will ensure that a copy of your report and our response is sent to the Care Quality Commission. I hope that this response is helpful and I am grateful to you for bringing the circumstances of Mrs Tweedy’s death to my attention. Yours sincerely
14 MAY 206
Peps Toe ey ten Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS)
for those Wwe love the most NHS Foundation Trust
Trust Management Offices
Norfolk & Norwich University Hospitals
Ms Jacqueline Lake NHS ony tne
HM Coroner Norwich NR4 7UY
Norfolk Coroner's Office
69-75 Thorpe Road
Norwich NR1 1UA
Our Ref: ADMvri!Q. 14.022
11 May 2015
Dear Mrs Lake
Nicola TWEEDY (Deceased)
Further to my letter of 23 March, | attach a copy of our response to your Report arising from
the death of Mrs Tweedy. This is in table form, to ensure that we have addressed each of
the issues that you raised.
| anticipate that the response will be self-explanatory, although some of the issues
concerned are complex. If it would be helpful to discuss at all please let us know.
You will appreciate that the question of thromboprophylaxis following day case surgery is
contentious and the evidence base on which to found best practice is limited. | should
therefore make clear that the change in prescribing practice introduced by surgeons at our
Trust was based on our ongoing audit of 60,000 day case patients over the last 5 years,
tather than on the sad outcome in Mrs Tweedy’s individual case. Rare complications will
sometimes occur and there are genuine concerns that increased use of thromboprophylaxis
will generate increased risks of bleeding for other patients. We will continue to monitor the
position closely.
There are always opportunities to learn and, as you know, we produced an action plan in
advance of your Inquest in this case. Recent external inspection has confirmed that we had
implemented the actions we had identified in our plan and that this “demonstrated that
learning and improvement had taken place’.
On an administrative point, we understand that a copy of your report was also sent to the
Department of Health, but it contained a different date for our response to be received. In
order to avoid confusion, | can confirm that we have responded within the timeframe stated
in the original report that you sent to the Hospital.
Yours sincerely
CRief Executive
SU} UO USye} SEM UOISIOSP SI} Jey}
910J8J84} esiseydwe 0} JueLOdW! s! 3
‘Bulpeaiq jo suoleodwos pasesoul
0} as aaib Aew siyj yeu) uedu0s
SigeyAsul si ajay, ‘Alabuns ulea
asoouen SHulobispun sjuened oseo
hep 104 sixejAydoidoquuoiuy Jo skep ¢
aquoseid Ajeuijnol Mou suoeBins uno
*SJUBAB S1]OQLUB-OQUIOIU} JOJ JOJOe) YSI
juepusdepul ue ag Aew AisGins ulda
@SOSHBA Jey} poyljuap! sAey suoeBbins
Jeinosen pue sjsiBojoyewoey
uno ‘sjuayed eseo Aep goo'os
49A0 JO ypne BuloHuo uno jo yyby uy
eee
juewebpnf jeoiuijo jeuoissajoid ou} pejueseided osje
HU IN By} ssos9e sequad Jofew ul soy0eId jeoIUI|D
UYIM SU] Ul JeA@MOY SBM OSB sIy} Ul UUEda}Y Jo asop
a[Buls @ Jo uoneNsIuIWpe ayy ‘ajndsip juenbesqns
PSPiOAe SAeY P/NOM si} se ‘pajsidiuoo useq WoO}
JUSUSsasse YS 84} peY injdjey useq aney Pinom
‘PeYo oNeujsseue Sy} UO pajou sem
Siyy pue ued} usalb aq pinoys juaned ay) jeu
pesibe sem ji Jey) SeM UOISssNosIP ay} Jo slUCo}No
UL ‘pajueuinoop JeAamoy jou sem jUaUUssesse
aul ‘NO pswes sem SYS sdOqUIe0qUIOJU)
JO) JUslUSSesse YS Jey) PsWUyUOD aAey UoAaBuns
yueynsuog sy} pue isyeujseeuy jueynsuog ayL
C2O'VT Ol 32y
S1OJOB YSU OY] jNOge jJsHeyjseeuy ey}
pue ainpazoid ay} Buleasieno Uuoebins
jueynsu0d ey] ueamjeq uolssnosip
ues pip Siy} pue pasiyjeyjsoeue
Bujag Apeamy su Buimoyjoy pajejduioo
useq jou pey juawssessy ysRy ey}
Jey} pejou sem yy ‘uoHeIedo ay) a/0Jag
em Apeam, sup oo} Buyejas suojoes
ysu oyioeds dn pebbey aaey pinom
SI4} pejajdwioo useg juawssassy ySiy
au] peH yeydsoy oy; yym sbuyeep
sApeem, sip ynoyBnosyy juiod Aue
J@ pajajdusoo jou sem wuoy juawssessy/
YSRY sixejAydosdoquiosy f oul,
‘sypne
uonejuewinsop jo ajoX4o seinfeld uno
Jo ed Se SIU} MaIAal ISABMOY JIM SAA
‘JUSUINDOP PesiAds OU} JO UONe|dw0s
ul 6Buiuyes} oyioeds Aue suinbeu
IIMA YEIS INO }2U) BAaII9q JOU OP aA,
“,998/0 ueye] pey juausanosduut
pue Bujusesy ey] pajeysuowap,
SIU} Jey} pue (pajsl] sem uoNOe si}
USIYM UO) UB] UO!DYW Ss} payuswajduul
pey }sm{ au} yey) punoj, uonoedsul
[euJa}xe = juspuedepul jusoal vy
“ueAlB useq aAey
S]ajee| JEU] SOUaPIA® si aley} ayndsip sinyny Aue
Ul JEU} OS UOHEUSWUNDOP PyepUe}s JNO 0} XOq-yOII,
Jeuolippe ue pappe eaey om ‘aseo siy} Bulmojljo4
“onueded aaissaoxe plone 0} Jap10 Ul —
quaned yoes 0} uoveWojul piepueys au) UEeAIB one
Aauy yeu} yuewnoop 0} yes ino payinbas jou aney
@M ‘Jsed SU} Ul - Pa}UsWINDOP JeASMOY JOU SEM SIU
“"SS8d0ld SIUIJO
jueussasse-eid au) Jo Wed piepuejs e se sjusned
0} pepinoid aie spealgns jo eBues © uo sjeeoq
(paseedeq) Apsam| ejooIN si
“ANO paseo
Bureq si siyj Moy 188/90 jou si yf ing
‘eoejd ul Mou si Suuoy Jo Bunipne pue
Buruley poojsiepun si jy} ‘pajejduoo
Aju = pue Ayedoid are = suuoy
#f YIOM AJUO IM Sif “@UOP SI SIyy Jey]
Suips02a4 uoHejusWNoOp 0} peppe useq
Mou Sey ,,XOF9 OH, @ POOJsiapun Ss} }]
‘JuaHed ay] 0} papuey
jou sem ayeoiaye pue sainpsood
oy}
oj Bune: sjoyea; oyoads, b
SL0Z YEW ZL payep loday gz uoneinBay 0} asuodsay
smu wonepUNoY SHN
RIFT] SIPRASOH Auisuanlun YoImuoN pue xjoLJON
SOW atp BAO} BM BSOUR 104
1WeM aM 312 34) YIM
waned Kara apuoid 01
UOISTA JNO
©
VAN
"sayel UOS|dwos uo eyep JeyjeS
Aijeoyewoyne pue AJoyepuew
jusussesse ys FLA eyew |jIm
yaiym waysks Buiquosaid siu098|0
JNO jNO-[jO1, 0} Buinuyuod ae ap,
esinu Sy} JO SouaplAa Su} se BUIpPUe\sJepunsiw
e UO paseq aq jsnlW anssi Siu} yeu) Ssaaliag ayy
“sIS@q JUS}SISUOD B UO UOTeJUaLUNZ0p
JUSBWISSESSE YSU JUBASI@l BY} ajajdwod o} Yes JO}
JaISES }] SYEW 0} SIU] JOSdxs apA ‘ING’ JO SSeOxe Ul
yS09 B Je /eydsoy ino ul Wa}shs Buiquoseid a1u0sjoa|a
ue Buyuswejdu Ajjusuno ae am pue seyeq op
0} JUEM eM ‘OS USAQ “OU Jeq ‘AqUNOS ay} Ul JsMaL
Jeyjo Aue ue} sjuaussesse ysU sixe|Aydosdoquuosuy
SJOW JNO sawed JsM_ siy} yey} puelsiepun sp,
“SSOUBISLUNDIIO BSEU} Ul ayeUdoidde
S| sixejAydoudoquiosuy «= papuayxa
JOUJOYM UO MIA JUsIayIp e dope
AW SO1]US9 Jayjo pue sudsBuns JaU}O
yey} puelssepun 8m pue aaisnjouco
2 y& jou JaAamoy si eae siyy
Ul SOUEPIAD OY) ‘sixe|AYdosdoquosu}
uo soueping jeuojeu Jo uoIsiAel aunyny
Aue Suojul yey) aouspiae BuiAapun
ayy JO Yed WO} |WM silyy yeuy
ajediojue am pue sBuljsew oyueIos
pue jeouyo ye epep sey} Bunodes
peyeys Apeaye aaey siopop ino
“‘paequoseid
sBnip jo jyunowe eu aonpal
pue sojoeid ul afueyo sil esienal
Pinoys am jeu} YONs ale suo!eoI|dwoo
Bulpaaiq pssesiou! aseo ul sawooino
ino ypne Oo} eanujuco jim apy,
‘eased (ENpIAIpUI
sApeem_ SIA 0} asuodsas ul
jou pue ejep jipne Jeat-g uno Jo siseq
‘aquosaid
0} uleday jo junowe ay} yo yuawefpnl jesiuio
juaieyip @ peonpoid saey jou pinom juessesse
YS SU} JO UOISSNOSIp Ja|yes Jey) S| UOHeoYdu) BULL
“aud 0} pesoddo se
S1OJOR} YSU /BJSASS YUM Sjuarled ul YS Ul SseauoUl
SIGEJSUOCWWSP OU S| SOU} JEU) ‘JEA@moy weajo suusas
SOUSPIAS BY] “SAO@dsied Ae], e Woy UONe}adxe
0} Areijuoo aq Aew siy) yey payeloeidde si }
“SAHe|NWND JOU aue
SJUBAS SOQuIaoqUOJYY JO Sys SY} Jey} UMOUS sey
sjusied eseo Aep 000'09 JO MaIAal & yeu) ‘soUapIA]
84} Ul! INO JOS UOHEUOJUI SU} Jeadei 0} JUBOdUI si}
"SSB9 SIU} JO SSOURIsUUNDIIO JeiNoNed SU} Ul
Z20'VT Ol You
uaes Ayenjoe pey Sajou ey} Burajduoo
OSJNN ey} Jey] eQUEpIAe OU sem aay
snes (a
« SYSU [eHUS]OU PUe SYSU 9Y} 0}
uaniB uaeq eaey pjnoo jyBnoy} sedoid
usym uo Ayee uoyeuuOju jUueAd|es
84] JO UOHeJEpisUuod sEdOsd pue jjnj & 4Of
Mole JOU pip py ‘ainpesoid ey} ul ebejs
SIY} JE JBAQMOH] ‘USye}] Og 0} UOHOe pue
,208/d Ua}e}] pey JUeWIAaAICU
pue Bujusesy yey} pajeysuowep,
SIU} Jeu} pue (pays; sem uoe siUy
YOIUM UO) Ug UOlOY s}i payusWwedul
pey }SML ay} yeu} puno} UoNsedsul
jeuls}xe = juapusdspul jusods vy
“Jua}sIsuco
SBM SI4} JEU} SuNSUS 0} PamalAdl aq 0} SEM Ndad
34} Spis}no sjusied saseo Aep o} Buldidde ssaooid
au} ysip9eyo eBieyosip (Nda) wun sunpedoig
feq Buysixe ayy Aq paisaco sem anssi si}
IS|IYM JEU paule|dxe aseo siy} UO UBIq UOOY uno
‘eBieyosip aiojoq
asiiqow 0} Ayjige sjuayed ey, ssesse 0} paau du}
pepeljes Ajayenbepe sjuayed eseo-Aep Jo, sBieyosip
Pe] eSuNU JO} BLUdIO Oy) Jey] Sinsue 0} pajueEM
aM JeAemMoY sjuayed eseo-Aep 0} Aidde 0} pejpedxa
8q JOU pjNnom jsIPoOaYo aHyeyosip jusyed-ul jn} aul
‘aBueYOSIP 310J8q jE10] Sy} 0}
usaq pey pue yup & pey ‘ieddns ueyeo pey yuened
24} JeU} Sesunu ay} Aq papsooas sem I eseo Siu} U]
tT SSSFSSSSSsSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSeFeeseeeeee
“yualjed aut Ulm UOeSsIaAUON & pajuNodel
220'VTOl JOU
« P}a{dWwO9 Jou sem ebieyosip
uO UONa;dwWOO"sOj UO ISIPOEYO ay!
, Pebieyosip
si jueyed e al0jaq payoeyo
8q 0} pasinbas ssojoes ay} jje 48009 Ayny
jou pip ebseyosip uo sajou Bujsunn,
‘abseyosip 0} JOU Apeam{ Su
nn eee
OE Oe a eee
See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, and how often a new one appears.
What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text
Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.
These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.