Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2016

Jack Susianta

Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2016-0176, written 6 May 2016. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.

Date of report6 May 2016
Reference2016-0176
DeceasedJack Susianta
CoronerMary Hassell
Coroner areaInner North London
CategoryChild Death (from 2015) · Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths
Organisation namedEast London NHS Foundation Trust · Homerton University Hospital NHS Trust
Sourcejudiciary.uk record · original PDF
Responses publishednone published

The report

Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.

Regulation 28:  Prevention of Future Deaths report 

Komang Jack SUSIANTA (died 29.07.15) 

THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: 

1.  Dr Kevin Cleary 
Medical Director 
East London NHS Foundation Trust 
Trust Headquarters 
9 Alie Street 
London  E1 8DE 

1 

CORONER 

I am:   Coroner ME Hassell 
           Senior Coroner  
           Inner North London 
           St Pancras Coroner’s Court 
           Camley Street 
           London  N1C 4PP 

2 

CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS 

I make this report under the Coroners and Justice Act 2009,  
paragraph 7, Schedule 5, and  
The Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013, 
regulations 28 and 29. 

3 

INVESTIGATION and INQUEST 

On  3  August  2015,  one  of  my  assistant  coroners,  William  Dolman, 
commenced  an  investigation  into  the  death  of  Jack  Susianta,  aged  17 
years.  The  investigation  concluded  at  the  end  of  the  inquest  on  29  April 
2016.    At  inquest,  the  jury  made  a  determination  that  death  arose  as  a 
result of a drug related accident. 

4 

CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH 

Jack  was  a  17  year  old  boy  who  suffered  a  drug  related  psychotic 
episode after having taken cannabis and ecstasy at a music festival.  He 
was detained by police under s136 of the Mental Health Act and taken to 
Homerton University Hospital at around 3am on Tuesday, 28 July 2015.   

1 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Following assessment, he was diagnosed as having suffered a substance 
related  psychosis,  and  was  discharged  soon  after  7am  with  a  plan  for 
follow up. 

However,  after  discharge  Jack’s  condition  deteriorated.    His  family 
recognised this, but did not know how best to help him, other than to stay 
close and offer love & support.   

The  following  afternoon,  Wednesday,  29  July,  his  family  called  police 
again  but,  during  the  call,  he  left  the  family  home  by  jumping  through  a 
window.  Police attended and he was deemed a high risk missing person.  
During  a  line  search,  police  officers  saw  him  running  towards  a  river.  
One  gave  chase  and  nearly  caught  him,  but  Jack  dodged  and  then 
jumped in the river.  He submerged and drowned. 

5 

CORONER’S CONCERNS 

During  the  course  of  the  inquest,  the  evidence  revealed  matters  giving 
rise to concern. In my opinion, there is a risk that future deaths will occur 
unless  action  is  taken.  In  the  circumstances,  it  is  my  statutory  duty  to 
report to you. 

The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows.  

The  consultant  psychiatrist  who  assessed  Jack  on  the  morning  of 
Tuesday, 28 July, fully expected him to continue to improve.  Whilst she 
was concerned that he might take drugs again, she thought that he had 
recovered from this psychotic episode. 

However, she did not communicate to his family: 

- 

first  and  foremost,  the  fact  that  she  expected  him  now  to  be  free 
from all psychotic symptoms; 

-  second, that any recurrence of these symptoms would be a cause 

- 

for significant concern and potentially immediate action; 
thirdly, in exactly  what circumstances professional help should be 
sought on an urgent basis and how to go about this. 

Jack’s  family  were  very  worried  indeed  about  his  condition.    However, 
because  they  had  not  been  given  the  clinical  expectation,  they  did  not 
know  that  they  could/should  take  him  back  to  hospital,  even  though  he 
had been discharged only hours before.   

By  the  time  they  rang  police  that  afternoon,  Jack  was  on  the  point  of 
leaving the house.  However, they had felt something was wrong from the 
evening  before.    His  brother  had  even  trawled  the  internet  looking  for 
appropriate advice.   

2 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 I am aware that new systems have been put in place by the East London 
Foundation  Trust  at  Homerton  University  Hospital.    The  one  point  that  I 
would  like  most  especially  to  bring  to  your  attention  is  the  need  to 
communicate  clinical  expectations  (preceding  return  advice)  to  patients 
and their families before discharge. 

6 

ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN 

In  my  opinion,  action  should  be  taken  to  prevent  future  deaths  and  I 
believe that you have the power to take such action.  

7 

YOUR RESPONSE 

You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date 
of  this  report,  namely  by  11  July  2016.    I,  the  coroner,  may  extend  the 
period. 

Your  response  must  contain  details  of  action  taken  or  proposed  to  be 
taken,  setting  out  the  timetable  for  action.  Otherwise  you  must  explain 
why no action is proposed. 

8 

COPIES and PUBLICATION 

I have sent a copy of my report to the following. 

  HHJ Peter Thornton QC, the Chief Coroner of England & Wales  
  Homerton University Hospital NHS Trust 
  Hackney Child Death Overview Panel 
  The Susianta family 

I  am  also  under  a  duty  to  send  the  Chief  Coroner  a  copy  of  your 
response.  

The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted 
or summary form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who 
interest.  You  may  make 
he  believes  may 
representations to me, the Senior Coroner, at the time of your response, 
about  the  release  or  the  publication  of  your  response  by  the  Chief 
Coroner. 

it  useful  or  of 

find 

9 

DATE                                                   SIGNED BY SENIOR CORONER 

06.05.16 

3

Related reports

Other reports by Mary Hassell

See all →

More reports categorised “Child Death (from 2015)”

See all →

Track East London NHS Foundation Trust

See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching East London NHS Foundation Trust, and how often a new one appears.

What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text

Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.

These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.