Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2016
Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2016-0499, written 28 Jan 2016. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.
| Date of report | 28 Jan 2016 |
|---|---|
| Reference | 2016-0499 |
| Deceased | Ronald Volante |
| Coroner | Andre Rebello |
| Coroner area | Liverpool |
| Category | Other related deaths |
| Source | judiciary.uk record · original PDF |
| Responses published | 1 |
Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.
REGULATION 28: REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS (1)
NOTE: This form is to be used after an inquest.
REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS
THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO:
Magenta Living Support Link
Partnership Building
Hamilton Street
Birkenhead
CH41 5AA
1
CORONER
I am André Joseph Anthony Rebello, Senior Coroner, for the area of Liverpool & Wirral
2
CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS
I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009
and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013.
3
INVESTIGATION and INQUEST
On 13th November 2015 I commenced an investigation into the death of Ronald
VOLANTE, Aged 74. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 28th
January 2016. The conclusion of the inquest was
Ia Ischaemic Heart Disease
Ronald Volante has died of Natural Causes it is not possible from the evidence to say
that there was an opportunity to have prevented his death
4
CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH
Ronald Volante suffered from coronary artery disease which has caused ischaemic
heart disease and an enlarged heart. He had previously suffered a myocardial infarction
which required triple vessel coronary artery bypass grafting. Ronald Volante was in
difficulty at 18.35 on 5th November 2015 and called an out of hours alarm monitoring
service shouting for help. The monitoring service are not contracted to respond in
person within this sheltered accommodation tenancy agreement. The monitoring service
made attempts to contact Mr Volante's next of kin. An ambulance was called at 18.38
and from the information given the call was coded as green 2 for an ambulance to be
dispatch as soon as possible. This was a busy bonfire night and was coded green 2
because Mr Volante was breathing and conscious. The ambulance were not given
information from Mr Volante's medical notes nor were they alerted that by the time the
call between he monitoring service and Mr Volante finished at 18.46, Mr Volante was no
longer responding to information that an ambulance had been called - this was a change
in circumstances as there was no longer evidence that Mr Volante was conscious and
breathing. The ambulance arrived at 20.28 and Mr Volante was already deceased being
certified at 20.29. It is found that Mr Volante died at some time between 18.35 and
20.29.
1
5
CORONER’S CONCERNS
During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. In
my opinion there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action is taken. In the
circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you.
The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows. –
[BRIEF SUMMARY OF MATTERS OF CONCERN]
(1) Magenta Living Support Link had access to Mr Volante’s medical history and
there is no evidence that this was used to advise the ambulance service of his
cardiac problems – is this covered in the induction training of call handlers?
(2) Magenta Living Support Link were aware that there had been a change in Mr
Volante’s presentation by 18.46 as he did not respond to the news that an
ambulance was on the way – is this covered in induction training of call handlers
with regard to advising a doctor or emergency service of a change in
circumstances after the first call?
(3) The training manual and method of training call handlers needs to be revisited in
the light of the experience from Mr Volante’s tragic death
(4)
6
ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN
In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you
[AND/OR your organisation] have the power to take such action.
7
YOUR RESPONSE
You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report,
namely by 24th March 2016. I, the coroner, may extend the period.
Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out
the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed.
8
COPIES and PUBLICATION
I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested
Persons
– Daughter
– Daughter
North West Ambulance Service
Regenda Housing who may find it useful or of interest.
I am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response.
The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary
form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful
or of interest. You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your
response, about the release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner.
9
André Rebello
Senior Coroner for the
City of Liverpool and Wirral
Dated: 28th January 2016
2
1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.
REGULATION 28: REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS RESPONSE OF MAGENTA LIVING TO CONCERNS OUTLINED PURSUANT TO REGULATION 28: REPORT TO PREVENT FURTHER DEATHS — MR.VOLANTE In the case of Mr Ronald Volante Background Magenta Living delivers a Community Alarm monitoring service to our own tenants and as in the case of Mr. Volante, to other local housing associations that do not provide their own monitoring services directly. The service is a non-statutory housing related service aimed at pramoting independent living within a home setting. It is accredited by the TSA (Telecare Services Association) which is the national body against whose standards we are assessed. Magenta Living does not provide a visiting warden’s service to this scheme. CORONER’S CONCERNS 1, Magenta Living Support Link had access to Mr. Volante’s medical history and there is no evidence that this was used to advise the ambulance service of his cardiac problems - is this covered in the induction training of call handlers Current practice Hitherto the approach has been that once through to the Ambulance Control Centre the community alarm operator is taken through a set of standard questions by the Ambulance Service operator. These questions are designed to elicit sufficient information in respect of the address, location, access arrangements and the condition of the person concerned and is used by the Ambulance Service to prioritise calls. This is reflected in Magenta Living’s written procedure, which is provided to all call handlers as part of their training, which states in relation to “Requesting ambulance attendance”, that “if requested by the ambulance service controller, the call handler shall provide such additional information as they have in respect of the incident and the building.” Proactively providing medical history to the ambulance service at the point of initial contact by call handlers was not covered in induction training for call handlers. This does not form part of the procedure accredited by the TSA. The procedure was established in the context that the ambulance service is in a better position to assess what information is and isn’t relevant. In Mr Volante’s case, the Magenta Living call handler followed procedure and answered the questions posed to him by the ambulance service controller and no details regarding medical history were requested. Had the ambulance service controller requested such detail, and they were in the position to assess whether medical history was relevant, our call handler would have provided the information Response to Coroner’s concerns Following the concerns raised at the inquest and subsequently detailed in the Regulation 28 Report to Prevent Further Deaths Notice we have revised how we will deal with calls to the Ambulance service. We have written to all of our community alarm customers, including those organisations with whom we have contracts to provide a similar service. We have confirmed that with immediate effect that there will be an addition to current procedures in so far as we will share medical details at the point of contact with the emergency services unless service users specifically advise us otherwise. As a result of this change of procedure, all Magenta Living community alarmed trained call handlers were briefed with effect from 28" January 2016 as to this change and provided with a copy of the updated procedure that now includes this additional stage. As part of this discussion, staff confirmed their understanding of the new procedure which is recorded in their training record. This change of procedure will also be addressed with any new staff as part of their normal induction programme. Additionally, as part of our commitment to improve service standards, we have liaised directly with the TSA and discussed in detail the concerns raised by the Coroner. Whilst the TSA reaffirmed that there is currently no national requirement to share medical information with the emergency services, the TSA has confirmed their intention to review the relevant parts of their Code of Practice. The TSA has indicated that they aim to introduce measures to ensure that the provision of medical history to the ambulance service is embedded within the Standards Framework within the Code of Practice as national practice in the future. Upon receipt of the amended Standards Framework from the TSA, we will provide a copy to the Coroner. 2. Magenta Living Support Link were aware that there had been a change in Mr. Volante’s presentation by 18:46 as he did not respond to the news that an ambulance was on the way —is this covered in induction training of call handlers with regard to advising a doctor or emergency service of a change in circumstances after the first call Current practice Historically, a change of circumstances would not result in a call handler updating the emergency services. To provide context this is because of the way the contact centre is connected to the sheltered housing scheme. The contact centre is connected to each scheme via a telephone line which allows the call handler the ability to speak with a resident who has activated the alarm as well as being able to control the communal door entry system to the block of flats. When an alarm is activated by a resident, the call would be closed down once the next of kin or ambulance service had been notified and as such a change of circumstance would not necessarily be evident. This practice was adopted due to the fact that keeping the line open could potentially impact upon our ability to respond to further activations from residents at the same scheme and to provide remote access to the emergency services when they arrive through the communal door entry system. Response to Coroner’s concerns In light of the Coroner’s concerns, all Magenta Living’s community alarm call handlers have been briefed with effect from 28" January 2016 that they should update the emergency services of any change in the client’s circumstances / presentation as soon as these are known. To achieve this and to take into account the resource pressure experienced by the North West Ambulance Service and the impact upon their response times, we have now adopted a policy whereby a call handler will maintain regular contact with the resident until their key holders (next of kin) or emergency services arrive. This change of practice has been updated in our revised procedure. It is hoped that this approach will provide support to the North West Ambulance Service and assurance to those affected by delays in respect of ambulance response times. As detailed above, all Magenta Living community alarmed trained call handlers have been briefed in respect of this change and provided with a copy of the procedure that now includes these additional stages. As part of the discussion, staff confirmed their understanding of the new procedure which is recorded in their training record. This change of procedure will also be addressed with any new staff as part of their normal induction programme. 3. The training manual and method of training call handlers needs to be revisited in light of the experience from Mr. Volante’s tragic death Current practice Magenta Living’s has a thorough, comprehensive training and induction programme which is accredited by the TSA. Individual performance is regularly monitored through work reviews, team meetings, auditing and quality assurance, coaching, external auditing (for accreditation purposes), contract monitoring and customer feedback. Response to Coroner’s concerns However, in light of the Coroner’s concerns and appreciating that standards can always be improved, Magenta Living has incorporated a number of additions to the procedures manual as a result of the Coroner’s recommendations as set out above. Our standard practice, which has been followed in respect of these changes, is that any changes or amendments made to procedures are always quickly communicated to staff across the various shifts. This is carried out on a one-to-one basis and also at team level. For assurance purposes, Team Leaders and managers ensure staff implement any changes smoothly and effectively and measures are put in place to monitor this such as spot auditing, listening to call recordings, data checks. Any concerns are immediately brought to the attention of the member of staff and a performance improvement plan is established. This may include for example further coaching, side by side monitoring and peer support until an acceptable performance level is attained. As a learning organisation, training for Magenta Living community alarm handlers is continuous and this approach will continue. DATED 23 MARCH 2016
See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Andre Rebello, and how often a new one appears.
What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text
Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.
These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.