Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2017

Fallon Abby

Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2017-0288, written 8 Aug 2017. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.

Date of report8 Aug 2017
Reference2017-0288
DeceasedFallon Abby
CoronerMary Hassell
Coroner areaInner North London
CategoryHospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths · Community health care and emergency services related deaths · Suicide (from 2015)
Organisation namedEast London NHS Foundation Trust
Sourcejudiciary.uk record · original PDF
Responses published1

The report

Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.

Regulation 28:  Prevention of Future Deaths report 

Fallon Alphonsine ABBY (died 19.02.17) 

THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: 

1.  Dr Kevin Cleary 
Medical Director 
East London NHS Foundation Trust 
Trust Headquarters 
9 Alie Street 
London  E1 8DE 

1 

CORONER 

I am:   Coroner ME Hassell 
           Senior Coroner  
           Inner North London 
           St Pancras Coroner’s Court 
           Camley Street 
           London  N1C 4PP 

2 

CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS 

I make this report under the Coroners and Justice Act 2009,  
paragraph 7, Schedule 5, and  
The Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013, 
regulations 28 and 29. 

3 

INVESTIGATION and INQUEST 

On 19 February 2002, one of my assistant coroners, Heather Williams, 
commenced  an  investigation  into  the  death  of  Fallon  Abby,  aged  18 
years. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 7 August 
2017.  

I made a determination of suicide, when Fallon jumped from the balcony 
of her sixth floor bedroom at around 10.45pm on Saturday, 18 February 
2017, while two members of the ambulance service were attempting to 
persuade her to go to hospital for treatment. 

4 

CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH 

1 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Fallon had attended the emergency unit at the Royal London Hospital a 
week  before  her  death  following  an  intentional  overdose,  then  re-
presented  with  alcohol  toxicity.    She  was  admitted  to  Roman  Ward  of 
Mile End Hospital because she was thought to be at high risk of suicide.  
She  was  discharged  to  the  care  of  the  home  treatment  team  on 
Thursday, 16 February 2017. 

5 

CORONER’S CONCERNS 

During the course of the inquest, the evidence revealed matters giving 
rise to concern. In my opinion, there is a risk that future deaths will occur 
unless  action  is  taken.  In  the  circumstances,  it  is  my  statutory  duty  to 
report to you. 

The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows.  

I heard at inquest that no member of the team on Roman Ward contacted 
Fallon’s social worker.  There was no protocol for this. 

If they had sought a collateral history from the social worker, they would 
have  discovered  that  Fallon’s  mum  was  not  dead  as  Fallon  had  told 
them, but was alive and living in a hostel.  The social worker had been 
rung by a nurse at the Royal London Hospital, but she was waiting to be 
invited  to  a  ward  round  at  Mile  End  Hospital  and  such  invitation  was 
never made. 

It  seems  unlikely  that  proper  discussion  with  the  social  worker  would 
have  changed  the  outcome  for  Fallon,  but  it  would  have  meant  that 
valuable information would have been shared, and it would have meant 
that Fallon would have had the benefit of her social worker on hand upon 
discharge.  This might be very important for another patient. 

6 

ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN 

In  my  opinion,  action  should  be  taken  to  prevent  future  deaths  and  I 
believe that you have the power to take such action.  

7 

YOUR RESPONSE 

You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date 
of this report, namely by 9 October 2017.  I, the coroner, may extend the 
period. 

Your  response  must  contain  details  of  action  taken  or proposed  to  be 
taken, setting out the  timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain 
why no action is proposed. 

2 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 8 

COPIES and PUBLICATION 

I have sent a copy of my report to the following. 

  HHJ Mark Lucraft QC, the Chief Coroner of England & Wales 
  Care Quality Commission for England  
, sister of Fallon Abby 
 
 

, sister of Fallon Abby 

I  am  also  under  a  duty  to  send  the  Chief  Coroner  a  copy  of  your 
response.  

The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted 
or summary form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who 
he  believes  may  find  it  useful  or  of  interest.  You  may  make 
representations to me, the Senior Coroner, at the time of your response, 
about  the  release  or  the  publication  of  your  response  by  the  Chief 
Coroner. 

9 

DATE                                                  SIGNED BY SENIOR CORONER 

08.08.17 

3

Responses

1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.

Response from East London NHS Trust (PDF)
East London INHS

NHS Foundation Trust

Please respond to:

Associate Director of = =
Trust Headquarters

9 Alie Street

London

E1 8DE

Telephone: 020 3738 7253
9" October 2017

Senior Coroner M E Hassell
Inner North London

Poplar Coroner’s Court

127 Poplar High Street
London

E14 0AE

Dear Madam
Inquest touching upon the death of Fallon Abby

This is a formal response to your Regulation 28 Report dated 8" August in which you
set out your concerns relating to the care Miss Abby received from East London NHS
Foundation Trust.

| am aware that you heard evidence at the Inquest that Miss Abby had a social
worker from the Leaving Care Team. You were concerned that during Miss Abby's
admission to the Ward no contact was made with the social worker and no invitation
was issued for her to attend the ward round.

Miss Abby's case highlighted that there was a lack of knowledge regarding the
involvement of the Leaving Care Team, with ward staff being unaware that a young
adult leaving care would have an allocated social worker up until the age of 25.
Therefore, whilst Miss Abby's social worker had been informed of her assessment by
the psychiatric liaison team in the Emergency Department she was not contacted by
ward staff, invited to the ward round of informed of her discharge from the ward.

In order to address this a number of actions will be undertaken as follows:
Firstly, the Named Professional for Safeguarding Children will ensure that
Safeguarding Children Training, which is mandatory for all staff, will include

information about the Leaving Care Team and their involvement with a young person
up to the age of 25.

Po Chief Executive: Dr Navina Evans

The Named Professional for Safeguarding Children will also undertake some
bespoke training with Ward managers and Matrons in relation to this specific issue
for cascading to all ward staff.

This case and the issues highlighted will also be discussed at the regular
Consultant’s meeting and again cascaded to junior staff.

In addition the Operational Policy for the ward will be reviewed to include the
requirement to contact the Leaving Care Team in the event of an admission of a
young person who has previously been in care. Once the Leaving Care Team has
been informed of an admission staff will work with the young person to negotiate the
involvement of their social worker.

With the changes planned | hope you will be content that the Trust has taken these
issues seriously and adequately addressed your concerns.

If you do require any further information please do not hesitate to contact me.

Yours faithfull

eputy Medicat Director
ior and ehalf of

ting Chief Medical Officer

Po Chief Executive: Dr Navina Evans

Related reports

Other reports by Mary Hassell

See all →

More reports categorised “Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths”

See all →

Track East London NHS Foundation Trust

See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching East London NHS Foundation Trust, and how often a new one appears.

What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text

Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.

These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.