Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2018

Aaron Nordass-Lacey

Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2018-0028, written 31 Jan 2018. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.

Date of report31 Jan 2018
Reference2018-0028
DeceasedAaron Nordass-Lacey
CoronerRachael Griffin
Coroner areaDorset
CategoryRoad (Highways Safety) related deaths
Sourcejudiciary.uk record · original PDF
Responses published1

The report

Text recovered by OCR from a scanned PDF. OCR is imperfect: check anything you rely on against the source PDF. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.

REGULATION 28: REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS (1)

NOTE: This form is to be used after an inquest.

REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS
THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO:

1. Debbie Ward, Chief Executive of Dorset County Council, County Hall,
Colliton Park, Dorchester, Dorset, DT1 1XJ

1 | CORONER

Iam Rachael Clare Griffin, Senior Coroner, for the Coroner Area of Dorset

2 | CORONER'S LEGAL POWERS

I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice
Act 2009 and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations
2013.

3 | INVESTIGATION and INQUEST

On the 20" October 2016, an investigation was commenced into the death of
Aaron George Nordass-Lacey, born on the 6" July 1995.

The investigation concluded at the end of the Inquest on the 24" January 2018.
The Medical Cause of Death was:

1a Head and Chest Injuries

The conclusion of the Inquest was that Aaron George Nordass-Lacey died when
he fell from his bicycle and was struck by a motor vehicle, but the sequence of

events as to how he sustained his injuries is unclear, even on the balance of
probabilities.

4 | CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH

On the 13th October 2016, the deceased was riding his father's Corratec X-vert
Cross Pedal Cycle along the A35, Barrack Road, Christchurch at Bailey Bridge.
He made his way onto the central reservation of that road and fell from his bike
towards the carriageway into the path of an oncoming motor vehicle. He
sustained unsurvivable injuries to his head and chest and despite being taken to
the Royal Bournemouth Hospital, Bournemouth, his death was confirmed there
a short time later that day. The sequence of how he sustained his injuries is not
clear, whether he hit the ground before he was struck by the car, whether the
car struck him before he hit the ground, or whether both occurred at the same
time.

CORONE!

ER

During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to
concern. In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action
is taken. In the circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you.

The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows:

1. During the inquest evidence was heard that:

The road where the incident occurred that lead to Aaron’s death,
the A35 Barrack Road, Christchurch, Dorset is a road which has a
speed limit of 30 miles per hour. Evidence was given that people
regularly drive at excessive speeds on this road. The location of
the incident is near to a school and evidence was given that
people, especially school children, do not always use the
designated crossing just prior to the junction of Clarendon Road
and Barrack Road. Evidence was given that school children often
flood out of the school and run into the road. Evidence was given
that this was perceived to be a danger and that there could be
the death of a person in the future.

The placement of barriers along this section of road would assist
in reducing the access to the road and encouraging pedestrians
to use the crossing to cross the road safely, reducing the
potential dangers and risk to life. It was also suggested that a
fixed speed camera may assist in regulating the speed of vehicles
that use the road.

Evidence was also given in relation to the cycle lane along
Barrack Road. The cycle lane along Barrack Road heading
towards Christchurch is on the footpath and is a shared cycle
lane and footpath. The cycle lane comes to an end just before
the junction of Clarendon Road and evidence was given by the
Collision Reduction Team Manager that the expectation is that
when the cycle lane comes to an end, cyclists will cross the road
and use the cycle path on the footpath on the other side of the
road. Although there is a sign at the end of the cycle lane it is not
clear that the expectation is for the cyclist to cross over the road
at the crossing. The lack of signage is therefore very confusing
and could lead to a further collision.

2. Ihave concerns with regard to the following:

The safety of pedestrians and cyclists who use Barrack Road,
Christchurch where the incident that led to Aaron’s death
occurred. I would therefore request that there is a review of the
safety measures in place and consideration is given to the
erection of barriers along the pavement and also along the
central reservation to discourage pedestrians and cyclists from
crossing the road in a dangerous manner.

ii. I would also request that a review is undertaken regarding the
signage given to cyclists at this location and consideration be
given to having a fixed speed camera at this location.

6 | ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN

In my opinion urgent action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I
believe you and/or your organisation have the power to take such action.

7 | YOUR RESPONSE

You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this
report, 28 March 2018. I, the coroner, may extend the period.

Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken,
setting out the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action
is proposed.

8 | COPIES and PUBLICATION

I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following
Interested Persons:

1) BPS Law LLP, Cardinal House, 20 St Mary’s Parsonage,
Manchester, M3 2LY

(2) EE Browne Jacobson LLP, 1 Manor Court, Dix’s Field, Exeter, EX1
1UP, on behalf of

I am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response.

The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or
summary form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he
believes may find it useful or of interest. You may make representations to me,
the coroner, at the time of your response, about the release or the publication
of your response by the Chief Coroner.

3 | Dated Signed OLS ——

Rachael C Griffin

31* January 2018

Responses

1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.

Response from Dorset Council (PDF)
Collision Reduction Team 

A35 Barrack Road, Christchurch 

Response report 

Road Safety Assessment conducted by TMS 
Consultancy on behalf of Dorset County 
Council – March 2018 

Environment and Economy Directorate 
Dorset County Council 
County Hall 
Colliton Park 
Dorchester 
DT1 1XJ 

March 2018

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Road Safety Assessment  
Response 

A35 Barrack Road, Christchurch 

1. 

INTRODUCTION 

1.1 

1.2 

1.3 

1.4 

2. 

2.1 

This  is  a  report  in  response  to  a  road  safety  assessment  conducted  by  TMS 
Consultancy  on  behalf  of  Dorset  County  Council  for  the  A35  Barrack  Road 
Christchurch  between  Bailey  Roundabout  and  the  junction  with  Stour  Road.    The 
purpose of the assessment was to consider concerns raised by H M Senior Coroner 
for Dorset Racheal Clare Griffin regarding the inquest into the death of Aaron George 
Nordass-Lacey. 

The assessment was conducted by Mark Steventon, LLM, Eng Tech, MIHE, MCIHT, 
MSoRSA; Senior Road Safety Consultant, TMS Consultancy on Monday 5 March 2018 
and the report was completed on 22 March 2018. 

For completeness, the assessment considered concerns raised by HM Senior Coroner 
for  Dorset  and  also  other  potential  safety  issues  on  the  section  of  Barrack  Road, 
Christchurch between Bailey Roundabout the junction with Stour Road. 

Personal  injury  collision  data  and  traffic  speed/flow  data  was  supplied  by  Dorset 
County  Council’s  Collision  Reduction  Team  and  was  examined  as  part  of  the 
assessment. 

Safety Issues, Recommendations and Response. 

Paragraph 7.1 in report by TMS – Risk of accidents involving cyclists travelling too 
from school – minority of school pupils choosing to cross away from toucan crossing 
on Barrack Road. 

Recommendation - Cycle safety training should be delivered at local schools. 

Response - Cycle safety training ‘Bikeability’ is delivered regularly to school in 
Christchurch and across the Dorset County Council area.  During 2017, six training 
courses were delivered at Twynham School and two at Christchurch Junior School.  
Training is planned for 2018 but no dates have been confirmed yet. 

2.2 

Paragraph 7.2 - Risk of collisions involving cyclists – shell fuel station access. 

Recommendation - Signs warning of cyclists at the fuel station forecourt have 
become damaged or misaligned.   

Response - These signs are not on highway – we will liaise with the filling station to 
request and arrange that signs are relocated. 

Recommendation – If practical, the perimeter fence of the electricity sub-station 
should be realigned and or adjusted to improve inter-visibility between exiting drivers 
and approaching cyclists. 

Dorset Highways 
Michael Potter 

22 March 2018 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Road Safety Assessment  
Response 

A35 Barrack Road, Christchurch 

Response - This has been deemed to be impractical. Moving the fence would 
compromise the safety for engineers when accessing the sub-station. 

2.3 

Paragraph 7.3 – Risk of pull-out collisions at side road junction (Arthur Road) 

Recommendation – Overhanging hedge should be cut back clear of the junction 
visibility splay. 

Response - This hedge is believed to be privately owned.  Work is underway to 
identify and contact the relevant landowner whose responsibility it is to cut back to 
the hedge as recommended. 

Landowners have 28 days from receipt of our request to cut back vegetation. 

2.4 

Paragraph 7.4 – Risk of head-on collisions between cyclists due to dense hedge 
affect visibility – footway/cycleway at Bailey Roundabout 

Recommendation – Hedge should be cut back and height reduced. 

Response - This hedge is believed to be privately owned.  Work is underway to 
identify and contact the relevant landowner whose responsibility it is to cut back to 
the hedge as recommended. 

Landowners have 28 days from receipt of our request to cut back vegetation. 

2.5 

Paragraph 7.5 – Risk of collision involving cyclists – warning sign obscured by 
overhanging vegetation. 

Recommendation – Overhanging vegetation should be cut back clear of the warning 
sign. 

Response - The overhanging vegetation is believed to be privately owned.  Work is 
underway to identify and contact the relevant landowner whose responsibility it is to 
cut back to the vegetation as recommended. 

Landowners have 28 days from receipt of our request to cut back vegetation. 

2.6 

Paragraph 7.6 – Risk of pedestrian trips and slips (Barrack Road/Stour Road 
junction) 

Recommendation – Pavement levels should be adjusted to improve drainage at the 
crossing points. 

Response - Nearby drainage gullies will be inspected during week commencing 26 
March with any required work ordered accordingly.  The pavement level will also be 
considered during this inspection with work ordered accordingly. 

Dorset Highways 
Michael Potter 

22 March 2018 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Road Safety Assessment  
Response 

A35 Barrack Road, Christchurch 

2.7 

Paragraph 7.7 – Risk of injury to pedestrian – post of local direction sign in footway. 

Recommendation – Conspicuity of the post should be improved e.g. by attaching a 
conspicuous coloured band at eye height. 

Response - Hi-viz coloured band to be added to post on Tuesday 27 March 2018. 

2.8 

Paragraph 7.8 – Risk of side swipe collisions – Barrack Road north-westbound 
approach to Bailey Bridge – anomalous deflection arrow in offside lane. 

Recommendation – The redundant deflection arrow should be removed 

Response - Works order to remove deflection arrow raised on 22 March 2018 and 
will be completed as soon as is possible and before the end of April 2018. 

2.9 

Paragraph 7.9 – Risk of collision between cyclist and pedestrians – Barrack Road 
toucan crossing 

Recommendation – The segregated footway/cycleway sign should be removed.  The 
intended safe route for cyclists should be clarified by relocating the remaining ‘end of 
cycle route’ sign closer to the toucan crossing. 

Response - The removal of the segregated footway/cycleway sign and relocation of 
the ‘end of cycle route’ was ordered on 22 March 2018 and will be completed as 
soon as is possible and before the end of April 2018.   

I certify that I have reviewed the items raised in the Road Safety Assessment Report and I 
have given due consideration to each issue raised.  I have stated my proposed course of 
action for each item in this report. 

Name:  

Position: 

Collision Reduction Team Manager 

Organisation:  Dorset Highways, Dorset County Council 

Signed: 

Date: 22 March 2018 

Dorset Highways 

22 March 2018 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Road Safety Assessment  
Response 

A35 Barrack Road, Christchurch 

Dorset Highways 
Michael Potter 

22 March 2018

Related reports

Other reports by Rachael Griffin

See all →

More reports categorised “Road (Highways Safety) related deaths”

See all →

Track Road (Highways Safety) related deaths

See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Road (Highways Safety) related deaths, and how often a new one appears.

What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text

Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.

These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.