Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2018
Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2018-0210, written 29 Jun 2018. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.
| Date of report | 29 Jun 2018 |
|---|---|
| Reference | 2018-0210 |
| Deceased | Charles Rashan |
| Coroner | Mary Hassell |
| Coroner area | Inner North London |
| Category | Police related deaths |
| Source | judiciary.uk record · original PDF |
| Responses published | 1 |
Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.
Regulation 28: Prevention of Future Deaths report
Rashan Jermaine CHARLES (died 22.07.17)
THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO:
1. Deputy Assistant Commissioner
Metropolitan Police Service
6th Floor, New Scotland Yard
Victoria Embankment
London SW1A 2JL
1
CORONER
I am: Coroner ME Hassell
Senior Coroner
Inner North London
St Pancras Coroner’s Court
Camley Street
London N1C 4PP
2
CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS
I make this report under the Coroners and Justice Act 2009,
paragraph 7, Schedule 5, and
The Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013,
regulations 28 and 29.
3
INVESTIGATION and INQUEST
On 8 August 2017, I commenced an investigation into the death of
Rashan Jermaine Charles, aged 20 years. The investigation concluded
at the end of the inquest on 20 June 2018. The jury made a narrative
determination, a copy of which I attach, and recorded a medical cause of
death as follows.
1a cardiac arrest
1b upper airway obstruction by a foreign body during a period of restraint
4
CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH
Following a foot chase by a police officer, Rashan Charles entered a
convenience store and put a package in his mouth. There was a
struggle, during which the police officer detained him, took him to the
ground and, with the assistance of a bystander, handcuffed him.
1
During the next few minutes, Rashan lost consciousness and then
suffered a cardiac arrest. The police officer quickly asked for assistance,
but did not immediately call for an ambulance and did not appreciate that
Rashan was choking.
5
CORONER’S CONCERNS
During the course of the inquest, the evidence revealed matters giving
rise to concern. In my opinion, there is a risk that future deaths will occur
unless action is taken. In the circumstances, it is my statutory duty to
report to you.
The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows.
There was a point at which Rashan’s struggle against search of his
mouth became a struggle to breathe because he was choking.
The bystander, having been of significant assistance to the police officer
in securing the handcuffs, continued to give physical input and running
commentary.
When updating police officer training, it would seem helpful for those
developing policies and protocols to bear the following factors in mind,
factors that might not be otherwise evident to police officers.
1. An apparent struggle to resist search or arrest, might in fact be a
struggle to breathe, or might become that.
2. Choking is not always accompanied by classic signs such as
clutching the throat, coughing, red face or bulging eyes, but can
be silent and very quick.
3. It can be extremely difficult to assess whether breathing is present
and normal, particularly in a stressful and/or noisy situation. (I
heard evidence that, for training purposes, abnormal breathing
could possibly in future be simulated by a virtual reality
programme.)
4. Members of the public can sometimes give vital assistance, but
this assistance might need to be managed.
Analysis of a situation by a member of the public might give helpful
insight, but on the other hand might not be accurate.
Even a single member of the public might unwittingly distract an
officer, especially in a fast paced environment.
2
I heard evidence that, at present, MPS training does not include
specific advice about how best to utilise members of the public
who are willing and able to assist police officers.
6
ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN
In my opinion, action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I
believe that you have the power to take such action.
7
YOUR RESPONSE
You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date
of this report, namely by 27 August 2018. I, the coroner, may extend the
period.
Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be
taken, setting out the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain
why no action is proposed.
8
COPIES and PUBLICATION
I have sent a copy of my report to the following.
HHJ Mark Lucraft QC, the Chief Coroner of England & Wales
, medical director, MPS
, grandmother of Rashan Charles and
mother of Rashan Charles
I am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your
response.
The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted
or summary form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who
he believes may find it useful or of interest. You may make
representations to me, the Senior Coroner, at the time of your response,
about the release or the publication of your response by the Chief
Coroner.
9
DATE SIGNED BY SENIOR CORONER
29.06.18
3
1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.
METROPOLITAN ‘| POLICE The Coroner, ME Hassell Senior Coroner Deputy Assistant Commissioner Inner North London St Pancras Coroner's Court 6" Floor Camley Street New Scotland Yard London London N1C 4PP SW1A 2JL Your ref: Our ref: ix/81/17 Date: 23% August 2018 Dear Ms. Hassell, Re: Inquest touching the death of Rashan Charles Response to Prevention of Future Deaths Report | am the Deputy Assistant Commissioner for Professionalism in the Metropolitan Police Service (MPS). | write in response to your Regulation 28 Report to Prevent Future Deaths dated 29" June 2018. Your report was initially sent to Deputy Assistant Commissioner Matt Twist following the conclusion of the inquest into the death of Mr Rashan Charles. | note that the medical cause of Mr Charles’ death was recorded on 20" June 2018 as: 1a) cardiac arrest; 1b) upper airway obstruction by a foreign body during a period of restraint; In your Report, you made raised the following matters of concern: 1. An apparent struggle to resist search or arrest, might in fact be a struggle to breathe, or might become that; 2. Choking is not always accompanied by classic signs such as clutching the throat, coughing, red face or bulging eyes, but can be silent and very quick; 3. It can be extremely difficult to assess whether breathing is present and normal, particularly in a stressful and/or noisy situation. (I heard evidence that, for training purposes, abnormal breathing could possibly in future be simulated by a virtual reality programme.) 4. Members of the public can sometimes give vital assistance, but this assistance might need to be managed. You further stated that “analysis of a situation by a member of the public might give helpful insight, but on the other hand might not be accurate. Even a single member of the public might unwittingly distract an officer, especially in a fast-paced environment. | heard evidence that, at present, MPS training does not include specific advice about how best to utilise members of the public who are willing and able to assist police officers”. In drafting our response we have consulted with the relevant subject matter experts: mz MPS Medical Director, [EEE Strategic Health & Safety; Inspector J Officer Safety and the College of Policing. The College of Policing set the First Aid Learning programme (Appendix A) for police forces of England and Wales. This has the approval of the National Police Chiefs Council (NPCC) and the Health and Safety Executive (HSE). Response to Matters of Concern | respond to your Report as follows: 1. An apparent struggle to resist search or arrest, might in fact be a struggle to breathe, or might become that. The possibility that an apparent struggle or resistance might mask a medical emergency is firmly established within the MPS’ Emergency Life Support (ELS) training. It is central to training concerning positional asphyxia and Acute Behavioural Disturbance. It has also informed the MPS’ review of guidelines associated with restraint positions. Current work is focusing upon tilting the subject’s head forward to help reduce the risk of concealed objects falling into the airway and causing choking. The revised guidance is currently being peer-reviewed prior to adoption by the MPS. The findings will be shared with the College of Policing to help ensure best practice across England and Wales. The careful assessment of a subject's breathing features in one of the training scenarios within the 2018 / 2019 ELS training package. The scenario requires an assessment of a subject’s breathing, and them being re-positioned to assist breathing. The scenario then develops to noisy breathing and onto the delivery of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). 2. Choking is not always accompanied by classic signs such as clutching the throat, coughing, red face or bulging eyes, but can be silent and very quick. The MPS ELS training is delivered in accordance with the College of Policing First Aid Programme Specification (‘the Programme Specification’). This mandates the content of the first aid programme and the frequency with which elements of the curriculum should be delivered by police forces of England & Wales. The Programme Specification states in respect of choking: “An airway obstruction can be recognised by difficulty speaking, attempts to breathe or cough, increasing signs of asphyxia (blueness discolouration to face) and eventual loss of consciousness. Therefore, it is therefore made clear that individuals who are choking they may not be able to breathe or cough. Training on the signs and symptoms and the treatment of choking is included in the initial training delivered to new recruits. It is then included in refresher training in a three yearly cycle. It will next be covered in the 2019/ 2020 training cycle. Where the subject is not showing any of these classic signs the fact that they are not breathing, or are experiencing difficulty breathing should be identified by the breathing check. This aspect of first aid training is covered below. . It can be extremely difficult to assess whether breathing is present and normal, particularly in a stressful and/or noisy situation. The importance of completing a thorough breathing check and regularly monitoring a subject’s breathing is central to ELS training. The training states that if breathing cannot be established because a subject is in the recovery position, they should be turned onto their back to facilitate a full breathing check. It further states that CPR should be commenced if there is any doubt. Under current training, when completing an initial assessment of a subject's breathing, the check includes: - Not breathing - Not breathing normally, and - Not sure. The ELS training advises the following depending on the outcome of the breathing check: a. snoring may not be normal breathing, especially if drugs and alcohol are involved i.e. it may be due to a partial ainway obstruction. When a subject appears to be snoring, officers are to attempt to rouse them. If the snoring is because the subject is asleep, they will rouse. If the subject is roused, their snoring stops and they appear to be breathing normally, then their breathing should continue be monitored. b. If the subject is roused but the snoring continues their breathing should be checked carefully. c. If the subject does not respond, their airway should be opened. If they still do not respond, are not breathing normally, or the first aider is unsure, then CPR should be commenced. 4. Members of the public can sometimes give vital assistance, but this assistance might need to be managed. The potential value of bystanders in dealing with casualties is recognised within the training given to officers and is explored with various scenarios. These include assisting in placing a subject into the spinal recovery position, crash helmet removal and the delivery of CPR. However, due to the variety of potential situations combined with differences in their background, training and skills, it is not possible to be prescriptive about how bystanders may be best utilised. Instead, officers are expected make informed decisions based on the continual assessment & review of the specific circumstances of the incident through the application of the National Decision Model (Figure 1). Joptions MQencie q Figure 1: College of Policing: National Decision Model It is emphasised that bystanders should only be given tasks appropriate to any training or skills they might have and that they cannot take responsibility for casualties unless they are medical professionals with the training for such events. Conclusion The MPS has recommended changes to the Personal Safety Manual. Module 12, ‘Management of Persons Suspected of Concealing Items in Mouth’, now requires that where 4 possible the subject's head should be tilted forward thereby reducing the risk of any objects falling into the airway and causing choking. The MPS recognises the importance of effective first aid training to support its officers who may be required to administer first aid. First aid training of MPS officers is the remit of MPS Senior First Aid Advisor, is also Chair of the National Police First Aid Forum. The MPS continues to have a leading role in the-revigw and refinement of existing techniques and practices and acknowledges that this remaing a continual learning process. Yours sincerely, Deputy Assistant Commissioner
See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Police related deaths, and how often a new one appears.
What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text
Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.
These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.