Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2019
Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2019-0219, written 18 Mar 2019. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.
| Date of report | 18 Mar 2019 |
|---|---|
| Reference | 2019-0219 |
| Deceased | Peter Knight |
| Coroner | Jacqueline Lake |
| Coroner area | Norfolk |
| Category | Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths |
| Source | judiciary.uk record · original PDF |
| Responses published | 1 |
Text recovered by OCR from a scanned PDF. OCR is imperfect: check anything you rely on against the source PDF. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.
Regulation 28: REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT DEATHS THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: The Chief Executive Queen Elizabeth Hospital Gayton Road King’s Lynn Norfolk PE30 4ET 1 CORONER | am Jacqueline LAKE, Senior Coroner for the area of Norfolk 2 CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS | make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. 3 INVESTIGATION and INQUEST On 19/06/2018 | commenced an investigation into the death of Peter David KNIGHT aged 70. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 15/01/2019. The conclusion of the inquest was: Accident. The medical cause of death was: 1a Acute Exacerbation of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis 1b | 1c ll Ischaemic Heart Disease | 4 CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH Mr Knight had a long-standing history of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and was oxygen dependent. He was admitted to the Queen Elizabeth Hospital on 5 June 2018 and was diagnosed with a chest infection. On 6 June 2018 Mr Knight was transferred from the Medical Assessment Unit to Necton Ward during which time he was not connected to portable cylinder oxygen. On arrival on the ward he was seen to be hypoxic and despite being given oxygen, Mr Knight died later that evening. 5 CORONER’S CONCERNS During the course of the inquest, the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action is taken. In the circumstances, it is my statutory duty to report to you. The matters of concern are as follows: At the inquest | was satisfied that the Trust took the concerns raised seriously and was in the process of reviewing its Policy with regard to the transfer of patients, particularly those who are oxygen dependant. It was anticipated the Policy would be completed by the end of February 2019. In the circumstances, | wrote to the Trust asking them to write to me by 15 March 2019 with full details of the Policy. Not having heard from the Trust, my Officer contacted the Trust today. A response has been received indicating that new documentation has now been generated but a trial into its use has not yet commenced. Although it is stated that a trial is due to be started within the week and that if effective, implementation will be ratified by end of April, |am concerned that the inquest concluded in January 2019 and the Policy was not completed in the timescale indicated and agreed at the inquest and its trial has not yet commenced. 6 ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and | believe your organisation has the power to take such action. | 7 YOUR RESPONSE You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, namely by 13 May 2019. I, the coroner, may extend the period. Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed. 8 COPIES and PUBLICATION | have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested Persons: Clinical Commissioning Group Department of Health cac HSIB Healthwatch in Norfolk | am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response. The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of interest. You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response about the release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner. 9 Dated: 18/03/2019 | Jacqueline LAKE Senior Coroner for Norfolk Norfolk Coroner Service Carrow House 301 King Street Norwich NR12TN
1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.
A The Queen Elizabeth Hospital King’s Lynn NHS Foundation Trust 3 The Queen Elizabeth Hospital Gayton Road Kings Lynn Norfolk PE30 4ET www.gehkl.nhs.uk 08 May 2019 Mrs J Lake HM Senior Coroner for Norfolk Carrow House 301 King Street Norwich NR1 2TN Dear Mrs Lake Regulation 28 - in the matter of Mr Peter Knight (deceased) I'm writing to say that | am now able to respond to your Regulation 28 report dated 18 March with respect to the Transfer of Patients Policy. In order to do this | attach a timeline of the key events which have taken place since Mr Knight’s sad death and a copy of the policy itself which was ratified at the Clinical Governance Committee meeting on 7th May. | can also advise that | have visited the Knight family to apologise for the care and subsequent death of Mr Knight and for the way the family was treated. it was totally unacceptable. I have asked HS anc the family to attend our next Board meeting to share their experience if they feel they can do so. We have also promised to keep in close touch with the family throughout this difficult time. | hope that this reply gives you some level of assurance of the seriousness the Trust has applied and the learning needed in going forward. Yours sincerely 15 May 2019 Caroline Shaw Chief Executive Officer cc Cc - The Queen Elizabeth Hospital King’s Lynn NHS Foundation Trust Page 2 of 2 INAS) The Queen Elizabeth Hospital King’s Lynn NHS Foundation Trust Re Peter Knight (dec) - died 6 June 2018 - The Transfer policy Timeline of the development of the Transfer Policy Ww 7th September 2018 - Transferring the Critically III Patient Training study event - Facilitated by P| - Attended by Anaesthetic Doctors, Operating department assistants, Nurses from all areas. The “Do not transfer patients on Hi Flo airvo2 machine due to no battery back-up” decision post Mr Knight’s case was added in to the programme information. Qt October 2018 - BEB attended clinical governance meeting with the proposed Transfer of the critically ill Patient Policy. It was discussed at this meeting that the Transfer of patients (Trust-wide policy) required review as well and it was decided that the two policies should be combined a well as improved. | with GE senior management nurse) to discuss the Transfer of Patients policy. BB suggested that it needed to reflect intra- (within) hospital transfers much more. PF (retired Associate Director Patient Experience) had previously worked on the policy so set up meeting with, for as soon as possible. 16th October 2018 - Matron] sent out Risk Assessment Matrix for transferring patients to all Ward mangers and Matrons. 25t October 2018 -J met with i «0 go through the policy. Suggestions were made and taken away to look for information to go in to the Policy. We discussed which items could be added - Red Bags from nursing homes, DNAR status on transfer, Mental Health Patients, Obstetric patients. HB contacted Project Management Office to find out about Red Bags for patient from nursing homes to see if this needed to go in the policy. 2nd, 15th, & 26t November 2018 - email discussions about the Escort Flow Chart and documentation used for transfer of patients was shared amongst key personnel for comment. It was decided that there was so much to look at that a Task and Finishing group should be set up -H. lead on this. 11. The Queen Elizabet Hospital King’s Lynn NHS Foundation Trust HB contacted other hospitals to obtain different transfer policies across the region as it had been discussed at the Clinical Governance meeting that the policy might be better split in to Intra and Inter hospital policies. This view was overturned after great discussion within the Task finishing group set up to move things forward. 17th December 2018 - A meeting was finally set up following several attempts in order to ensure attendance of key personnel in the group as a Task & finishing group. It was felt imperative that the medical Associate Chief Nurse (ACN) ACN fF Corporate Nurse, Consultant Nurse Respiratory Specialist Nurse were all needed which delayed the initial meeting date. 15th January 2019 - The Inquest hearing took place. Conclusion - Accidental Death. HM Coroner for Norfolk required the hospital to write in March 2019 with regard to the up-to-date position in respect of the outstanding policy that is being reviewed. Meetings were arranged on 24th December, 7th January, 21st January (postponed due to clinical pressures), 28t January, 4th February, 10th February, 14th March, 15t March, and 21st March 2019. Input from areas such as Assessment areas, X-ray, Porters, Respiratory ward, Critical Care, and the Practice Development Team were included. The group researched and designed a handover sheet for all intra-hospital patients as the current documentation did not meet requirements. The guide for registered nurses to assess if the patient requires an escort was also amended and more detailed for patients with a lower News 2 score. The guide also suggests equipment for transfer of patients. The group decided that one document for all transfers would be of benefit and add in electronic links to specific documents separate from the policy would work well. This will enable specific documents to change and the policy link will always be as up to date as possible. This has delayed completion of the policy due to some policies being accessible on the intranet. Many emails were shared between meetings with various versions of documents for comment. NHS: The Queen Elizabeth Hospital King’s Lynn NHS Foundation Trust 13. 28% March 20) 9 - i ct 0 appraise where the policy is at and recommendations given to Julie to assist with electronic versions of documents for the policy. 14. 1st April 2019 - ‘Guide for Escort required for patient Transfers in hospital’ and ‘Patient Transfer Handover SBAR! tool’ out to trial during April in the high risk areas of Assessment Zone, Acute Medical Unit, Surgical Assessment unit and A&E before going Trust Wide. These areas found that the SBAR forms are working well and will to continue using the new forms beyond the pilot stage. 15. 26th April, the new Transfer of Patients Policy (Inter- and Intra-Hospital Transfer) reached the final draft stage for approval at the Clinical Governance Committee for ratification on 7th May. 16. Full launch of the adapted SBAR patient transfer tool Trust-wide in June following the pilot feedback and audit results (audit completed audit 3'¢ May). In addition a further compliance audit and use of the document will be carried out two months after the Trust-wide launch. Additional Points e The task and finish group has been meeting regularly with various subject matter experts since 17tt December 2018 to review all internal documentation and current practice regarding patient transfers. e During the review it has escalated in to a huge amount of work which involved reviewing all the documentation used, requesting documentation from other acute trusts to use as comparisons, including a review of the Oxygen use policy, what the risks were and what was needed to improve and educate staff throughout the Trust. e Part of this was the review of the current transfer stickers which are used by staff when transferring patients and the redesign of these using an SBAR format for safe handover of patient care, now been completed. * Situation, Background, Assessment and Recommendation 7 Vie int The Queen Elizabeth Hospital King’s Lynn NHS Foundation Trust e The transfer policy involves inpatient transfers and transfers out of hospital to various locations so have required a lot of input from a number of key people. We needed rigour when correlating all the information required and wanted to make sure it was safe and accurate so have needed the time to do this. e Benchmarking during this review period has revealed that other acute trusts have been using battery packs for oxygen-necessary transfers and these have proved problematic and given rise to incidents, leading to the conclusion that there is no easy cure-all technical solution. e Initial feedback from the acute areas referred to above has been positive and identified that although the new SBAR handover sheet and system has slowed the transfer process a little it has been agreed that it has flagged up problems that could have become incidents. e None of the feedback from the acute areas will mean that the finalised policy will need to be altered in any way. e The Medical Records Committee have approved the SBAR form and have adopted and barcoded it. The Transfer Policy Task and Finish Group 3rd May 2019
See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths, and how often a new one appears.
What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text
Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.
These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.