Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2019
Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2019-0237, written 11 Jul 2019. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.
| Date of report | 11 Jul 2019 |
|---|---|
| Reference | 2019-0237 |
| Deceased | Robert Rostron |
| Coroner | Rachel Galloway |
| Coroner area | Manchester (West) |
| Category | Care Home Health related deaths |
| Source | judiciary.uk record · original PDF |
| Responses published | 1 |
Text recovered by OCR from a scanned PDF. OCR is imperfect: check anything you rely on against the source PDF. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.
REGULATION 28: REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: (1) Justin Hutchens, Chief Executive Officer, HC-One, Southgate House, Archer Street, Darlington DL3 6AH CORONER 1am, Rachel Galloway, Assistant Coroner, for the Coroner Area of Manchester West CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS | make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013 INVESTIGATION and INQUEST On the 25" July 2018 an investigation was commenced into the death of Robert Charles Rostron, aged 72 years, born on the 9'" May 1946. The investigation concluded at the end of the Inquest on the 3 July 2019. The Medical Cause of Death was: 1a Sepsis 1b Pneumonia and Pyelonephritis 1c Alzheimers Disease ll Type 1 Diabetes, Administration of insulin on 17" September 2017. The conclusion at the inquest was that Robert Rostron died as a consequence of natural causes, exacerbated by the administration of insulin on a background of Type 1 diabetes. CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH 4. Robert Rostron (hereinafter referred to as “the Deceased”) died at Fairfield General Hospital, Rochdale Old Road, Bury on the 20" July 2018. 2. The Deceased suffered from naturally occurring Type 1 Diabetes, for which he required regular monitoring and treatment. From mid-September 2017, he was a resident at the Four Seasons Nursing Home (which is a home under the management of HC One) on the Spring Unit (which is no longer in existence). As well as Type 1 Diabetes, the Deceased suffered from Alzheimers Disease and his position was such that he required nursing care and support in a nursing home environment. 3. On the 17" September 2017, an Agency Nurse was in charge of the Spring Unit. He started his shift shortly after 8 am. That member of staff was a qualified nurse, with experience in mentai health matters but with limited experience of physical health matters. He was the only qualified nurse on duty on Spring Unit (albeit that there were other nurses present on adjacent units). He was in charge of the shift, with the support of healthcare assistants. He was also in charge of giving prescribed medications to patients on Spring unit that day. In evidence, the Agency Nurse confirmed that he had not worked on Spring Unit before. He had only ever undertaken one other agency-nursing shift, which was the day before and at a different place. On that occasion, he did have the support of another qualified nurse. On the 17" September 2017, he confirmed that he did not know where any of the patients’ records were kept, he did not read the patients’ records and he had no access to any care plans in respect of the patients he was caring for. On the morning of the 17 September 2017, the Agency Nurse undertook the medication round. He had been shown where the medication was stored by a Healthcare Assistant and had been introduced to patients on the unit. During the course of the medication round (which he undertook alone), he had reference to the Deceased’s medication record, which was stored by his bed. He did not have regard to the nursing records nor to any care plans contained therein, as he did not know where they were stored (they were apparently present in the nursing office). There was a care plan in place for the management of the Deceased’s diabetes, but he did not have regard to that. He took the Deceased’s blood sugar reading and noted this to be 2.2 (which is low). He then proceeded to give the Deceased what he considered to be his usual dose of insulin (8 units). This was not in accordance with the Care Plan in place and the evidence at the inquest was such that a qualified nurse would be expected to know that a reading of 2.2 units was a low reading and that insulin should have been withheld (and further measures taken, such as provision of a sugary drink to increase the blood sugar level). It was not until a few hours later that the Agency Nurse checked again on the Deceased. By this stage, the Deceased was unconscious and unresponsive. An ambulance was called and he was taken to Royal Bolton Hospital. On the basis of the evidence heard, | concluded that the Deceased never recovered to his previous baseline. He spent time at two further nursing homes following his admission to Royal Bolton Hospital before being admitted to Fairfield Hospital on the 25" June 2018. On the basis of the clinical evidence heard, it was my finding that the events of the 17° September 2017 caused increased frailty and indirectly contributed to the Deceased’s death. | found that the Deceased never regained his previous baseline and the administration of insulin on the 17" September was the cause of that. It made him more susceptible to the infections that he developed and led to his death on the 25" June 2018 at Fairfield Hospital. He would not have died when he did, but for the insulin administration on the 17'" September 2017. ao CORONER’S CONCERNS During the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action is taken. In the circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. During the inquest, evidence was heard that (at nursing homes under the control of HC One): 1. Agency Nurses are still used — if needed — to lead a shift, when they have never worked on the unit before. An Agency Nurse might still be the only qualified member of nursing staff on duty on the unit There is reliance upon a nursing qualification and the agency providing the Agency Nurse regarding nursing ability, suitability and training. 4. In this instance, the only induction to the Unit was by way of a Healthcare Assistant showing the Agency Nurse around on the morning of the shift. 5. The Agency Nurse did not appreciate the relevance of the blood sugar level of 2.2. 6. The Agency Nurse did not appreciate that no insulin should have been given in light of the reading of 2.2. 7. The Agency Nurse did not know where the nursing records were, the care plans for the patients or the relevant policies and procedures in place. 8. The Agency Nurse did not know that it was the policy of Four Seasons Nursing Home that insulin should only have been given by him, whilst a Healthcare Assistant was present to check the dose. | am concerned by the use of Agency Nurses in the homes under the management of HC One. In particular, | am concerned by the lack of formal induction and orientation to the unit on this occasion. | am concerned that reliance is placed upon the nursing qualification itself and the agency providing the nurse. | am concerned that an Agency Nurse was used as the senior member of staff in charge of the shift. | am concerned that the Agency Nurse was giving out medication when he had never worked at the Unit before and. | am concerned that there were no other qualified nurses on the Spring Unit at the time. request that HC One conducts a review of the use of Agency Nurses in their homes ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and | believe you have the power to take such action. YOUR RESPONSE You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, namely by 5!" September 2019. I, the assistant coroner, may extend the period. Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed. COPIES and PUBLICATION | have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested Persons: (1) (2) HC One — Justin Hutchens, Chief Executive, HC-One, Southgate House, Archer Street, Darlington D (3) CQC (North) a Inspector, Care Quality Commission (North, Aduit Social Care, Manchester. lam also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response. The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of interest. You may make representations to me, the assistant coroner, at the time of your response, about the release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner. | [9 | Dated 14" July 2019 Signed: z Rachel Galloway Uflug, HM Assistant Coroner Manchester West.
1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.
Sent via email to: Rachel Galloway HM Assistant Coroner inquests@bolton.gov.uk 09 September 2019 Dear Ms. Galloway, Regulation 28 Prevention of future death report following inquest into the death of Robert Charles Rostron I write in response to your letter of 11 July 2019 requesting written information and supporting evidence about action taken since the death of Mr. Rostron to reduce the risk of a similar incident occurring. With regard to Four Seasons in particular, you will probably be aware that the Discharge to Assess service, where the incident occurred, is no longer being delivered. Whilst we continually work hard to reduce agency use, we also recognise that the reality of running care homes means that this remains a necessity to ensure that there are always sufficient staff available to support the needs of the people accommodated. We are required to pay a premium for nurse qualified staff in such circumstances, because of the assurances this provides in relation to training and fitness to practice to ensure their continued registration. We, at HC-One, have been and remain committed to acting in whatever ways possible to ensure that we reduce the possibility of any recurrence of this incident and maintain the safety of all our Residents. I will respond to each of your concerns in turn. 1. Agency nurses are still used, if necessary to lead a shift, when they have never worked on the unit before There are still unfortunately occasions when we are required to call upon the need to cover nursing shifts at this and other homes with agency nurses. However, we have implemented a series of additional measures to reduce the likelihood of an agency nurse being required to lead a shift without having worked at the home or individual House before. All agency staff are block booked as far as possible to maximise knowledge of HC-One standards and also individual Residents’ needs across individual homes. HC-One T 01325 351100 F 01325 351144 Correspondence & Registered Office: Southgate House, Archer Street, Darlington, County Durham, DL3 6AH Registered in England and Wales: HC-One Limited, registration no. 07712656; Meridian Healthcare Limited, registration no. 01952719; HC-One Beamish Limited, registration no. 05217764; HC-One Oval Limited, registration no. 10257888; RV Care Homes Limited, registration no. 07417290. It is still possible that an agency nurse might lead a shift at a home, but we have reduced the risk by reviewing and strengthening the Orientation booklet for agency staff, which is due for completion and distribution across the company by the end of October 2019. 2. An agency nurse might still be the only qualified member of the nursing staff on duty on the unit. It is possible that an agency nurse might be the only qualified nurse on duty, however this is much less likely now. Nevertheless, many of our homes operate with rigorously trained nursing assistants, who have completed NMC accredited training that includes medicine giving, which includes clarity on the need for there to always be two staff present when administering this medicine. In addition, an agency nurse is always supplied with contact details of other nurses working within the same home, senior managers outside of the home who are on call on a rota basis and available to offer advice 24 hours a day for seven days a week. Details of this are posted in the nurse station, which is included in the orientation booklet that both the agency nurse and senior staff member sharing are required to sign and a copy is kept on the agency nurses file at the home, as well as them being supplied their own copy for reference. 3. There is reliance upon a nursing qualification and agency providing the Agency Nurse regarding nursing ability, suitability and training. The procedure now adopted after close liaison with agency suppliers is that all agency nurses who wish to work in HC-One homes are required to complete and submit a record of training, which specifically stipulates whether they have the skills, knowledge and up to date training to administer insulin safely. These training records and qualifications are audited annually and we can and do suspend use of agencies if there is any discrepancy or failure to complete. We currently have three agencies suspended for failing to comply in part with this agreement. I have attached a copy of the checklist for your attention (Appendix 1). This negates any reliance on the nursing qualification by specifically ensuring we have verified training and qualifications. We stipulate the required nursing qualification on making the booking with the agency and the Home Manager has the facility to choose from a series of profiles and makes a positive choice of nurse who has provided evidence as having the necessary and appropriate registered general nursing qualification as a minimum. Page 2 of 4 Concerns 4 – 8: In this instance, the only induction to the Unit was by way of a Healthcare Assistant showing the Agency Nurse around on the morning of the shift. The agency nurse did not appreciate the relevance of the blood sugar level of 2.2. The agency nurse did not appreciate that no insulin should have been given in light of reading 2.2. The agency nurse did not know where the records were, the care plan for the patients or the relevant policies and procedures in place. The agency nurse did not know that it was policy of HC-One that insulin should only be given by him whilst a Nursing Assistant was present to check the dose. As part of the agency nurse’s orientation to the home, the location of all risk assessments, care plans, the diabetes resource file, physical posters regarding hypo/hyperglycaemia management, hypo box, medicines and policies and procedures would be shown, as mentioned previously, to them by the most senior member of staff at the home, to support them in their shift, which would be the Home Manager, Deputy Home Manager or Nurse in charge of the home. This ensures that any agency nurse is fully orientated and knows where to locate important documents as well as summoning support within the home. I have supplied a copy of our Administration of High Risk Medicines procedure (Appendix 2) as there is a relevant section regarding insulin, indicating the necessity for all insulin administration to be supported by two colleagues. This is covered in the checklist now because of the lessons learned from the agency worker deviating from the procedure. Operational colleagues overseeing this home crafted and completed a Home Improvement Plan for Four Seasons, which detailed many of the actions we had determined would both improve safety of Residents who required support with insulin administration and management and have attached an updated version (Appendix 3), which provides assurances around the completion of these actions and outcomes. Since 2016, we have developed and implemented an agency procedure and although this was not due for a review until next year, a revision is in train to revise and this has already resulted in improvements in ensuring robust checks to agencies. I have attached (Appendix 4) the current version, not in place at the time of the incident, and will be happy to supply the updated version when finalised. The agency profiles already in operation and expected standard practice in all our homes, will be required to be held alongside the completed orientation booklet and held within the quality assurance system, Cornerstone. We have developed the system to allow the agency worker to also retain a copy of their booklet. Page 3 of 4 I trust this information is helpful and offers the necessary assurances that we have taken the situation extremely seriously and continue to review and strive to make continued improvements in the best interests of our Residents. Yours sincerely Head of Quality and Regulation Page 4 of 4
See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Care Home Health related deaths, and how often a new one appears.
What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text
Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.
These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.