Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2020

Shyama Rampadaruth

Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2021-0005, written 11 Dec 2020. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.

Date of report11 Dec 2020
Reference2021-0005
DeceasedShyama Rampadaruth
CoronerMary Hassell
Coroner areaInner North London
CategoryHospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths
Sourcejudiciary.uk record · original PDF
Responses published1

The report

Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.

Regulation 28:  Prevention of Future Deaths report 

Shyama Vadwatee RAMPADARUTH (died 17.04.20) 

THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: 

1.

Medical Director
Whipps Cross Hospital
Whipps Cross Road
Leytonstone
London  E11 1NR

1  CORONER 

I am:   Coroner ME Hassell 
 Senior Coroner  
 Inner North London 
 St Pancras Coroner’s Court 
 Camley Street 
 London  N1C 4PP 

2  CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS 

I make this report under the Coroners and Justice Act 2009, 
paragraph 7, Schedule 5, and  
The Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013, 
regulations 28 and 29. 

3 

INVESTIGATION and INQUEST 

On 3 July 2020, I commenced an investigation into the death of Shyama 
Rampadaruth, aged 86 years. The investigation concluded at the end of 
the inquest earlier today. I made a determination at inquest of death by 
natural causes. 

4  CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH 

Ms Rampadaruth had a number of co-morbidities, including renal failure, 
diabetes, hypertension, heart failure, asthma and cervical spondylosis. 

When she attended Whipps Cross Hospital for her routine renal dialysis 
on 13 April 2020, she was found to have a raised temperature and so 
was moved to a separate waiting area and dialysed with other patients 
suspected of having contracted COVID19. 

1 

 She was discharged home as usual, but deteriorated that night and was 
admitted as an emergency in the early hours of  the following morning.  
COVID19  was  diagnosed,  she  continued  to deteriorate and  died  three 
days later. 

5 

CORONER’S CONCERNS 

During the course of the inquest, the evidence revealed matters giving 
rise to concern. In my opinion, there is a risk that future deaths will occur 
unless  action  is  taken.  In  the  circumstances,  it  is  my  statutory  duty  to 
report to you. 

The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows.  

When COVID19 was suspected at her routine dialysis appointment on 
13 April, precautions were taken to separate Ms Rampadaruth from other 
patients to reduce the risk of transmission.  She was re-allocated to the 
evening  dialysis  clinic  with  other potentially  infectious  patients,  so  that 
the  unit  could  be  thoroughly  cleaned  overnight  to  make  it  safer  for 
patients at the next clinic the following day. 

However, this meant that Ms Rampadaruth had to wait for approximately 
six hours on a hard chair in a hospital waiting area.  This is clearly sub 
optimal for the health of a frail, elderly lady with multiple co-morbidities. 

The  patient  transfer  service  is  likely  to  have  been  busy,  but  Ms 
Rampadaruth and her husband lived nearby.  Her niece, who was very 
involved with her care,  works locally.  A quick call to a family member 
would have resulted in immediate arrangements being made to collect 
Ms Rampadaruth, bring her home to sit in comfort with familiar company 
and her usual food and drink, and then to return her when hospital staff 
were ready to begin her dialysis.  Her general well being could have been 
so enhanced by just a small change to administrative arrangements. 

6 

ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN 

In  my  opinion,  action  should  be  taken  to  prevent  future  deaths  and  I 
believe that you have the power to take such action.  

7 

YOUR RESPONSE 

You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date 
of this report, namely by 8 February 2020.  I, the coroner, may extend 
the period. 

2 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Your  response  must  contain  details  of  action  taken  or proposed  to  be 
taken, setting out the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain 
why no action is proposed. 

8 

COPIES and PUBLICATION 

I have sent a copy of my report to the following. 

 
  HHJ Mark Lucraft QC, the Chief Coroner of England & Wales  
 

, nephrologist, Whipps Cross Hospital 

, niece of Shyama Rampadaruth 

I  am  also  under  a  duty  to  send  a  copy  of  your  response  to  the  Chief 
Coroner and all interested persons who in my opinion should receive it.  
I  may  also  send  a  copy  of  your  response  to  any  other  person  who  I 
believe may find it useful or of interest.  

The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted 
or summary form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who 
he  believes  may  find  it  useful  or  of  interest.  You  may  make 
representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response, about 
the release or the publication of your response. 

9 

DATE                                                  SIGNED BY SENIOR CORONER 

11.12.20 

3

Responses

1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.

Response from Barts Health NHS Trust Redacted 1 (PDF)
Private & Confidential 
Ms Mary Hassell 
Senior Coroner 
Inner North London 
St Pancras Coroner’s Court 
Camley Street 
London 
N1C 4PP 

Dear Ms Hassell, 

 Trust Executive Office  
Ground Floor  
Pathology and Pharmacy Building  
The Royal London Hospital  
80 Newark Street  
London E1 2ES  

Telephone: 

Chief Medical Officer  

www.bartshealth.nhs.uk 

RE: Regulation 28 Prevention of Future Deaths Report 

I  write  in  response  to  your  Regulation  28:  Report  to  Prevent  Future  Deaths,  dated  11th 
December  2020.  Your  concern  was  related  to  the  environment  Ms  Shyama  Vadwatee 
Rampadaruth waited in on the 13th April 2020. 

At the inquest you raised the concern that Ms Rampadaruth waited 6 hours on a hard chair in 
the hospital waiting area rather than being allowed to go home while she waited for an evening 
dialysis session.  

This event took place during the first peak of Covid 19 in April 2020 and the steps taken that 
day were an emergency measure. The team recognise that the lady’s experience of waiting for 
her  dialysis  session  would  have  been  better  in  her  own  home  rather  than  in  the  hospitals 
waiting area.  

I would like to assure you that since that day a significant number of actions have taken place 
to improve the experience of patients attending dialysis. All dialysis patients are now swabbed 
weekly so Covid cases are picked up on asymptomatic patients. This has allowed us to isolate 
and  cohort  Covid  positive  patients  in  a  more  planned  fashion  than  Ms  Rampadaruth 
experienced during the first wave and we have, so far, been able to keep all our covid positive 
dialysis  on  a  single  site.  Additionally  the  renal  team  now  have  access  to  portable  dialysis 
machines that were not available during the first surge in March and April 2020. This has given 
the team more flexibility in arranging urgent isolated dialysis when needed.  

 
 
 
         
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 The dialysis service runs at over 99% capacity and so a lack of reserve does make managing 
dialysis  safely  through  the  pandemic  extremely  challenging.  They  are  therefore  actively 
planning to increase capacity and are seeking the resources needed to enable this. 

Finally the renal team recognise that vaccinating their vulnerable cohort of patients is likely to 
be the best strategy to prevent future deaths among their  vulnerable cohort of patients. They 
have  been  strongly  advocating  for  this  and  I  am  pleased  to  say  we  have  started  vaccinating 
the dialysis patients when they attend for their sessions.   

Thank you for bringing your concerns to my attention. I trust that you are assured that I have 
taken them seriously. I am very happy to discuss or clarify any of the above points.  

Yours sincerely 

Chief Medical Officer

Related reports

Other reports by Mary Hassell

See all →

More reports categorised “Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths”

See all →

Track Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths

See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths, and how often a new one appears.

What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text

Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.

These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.