Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2021
Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2021-0049, written 22 Feb 2021. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.
| Date of report | 22 Feb 2021 |
|---|---|
| Reference | 2021-0049 |
| Deceased | Cecilia Edwards |
| Coroner | Mary Hassell |
| Coroner area | Inner North London |
| Category | Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths |
| Organisation named | Whittington Health NHS Trust |
| Source | judiciary.uk record · original PDF |
| Responses published | 1 |
Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.
Regulation 28: Prevention of Future Deaths report
Cecilia EDWARDS (died 08.10.20)
THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO:
1. Dr
Executive Medical Director
Whittington Health NHS Trust
Whittington Hospital
Magdala Avenue
London N19 5NF
1
CORONER
I am: Coroner ME Hassell
Senior Coroner
Inner North London
St Pancras Coroner’s Court
Camley Street
London N1C 4PP
2
CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS
I make this report under the Coroners and Justice Act 2009,
paragraph 7, Schedule 5, and
The Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013,
regulations 28 and 29.
3
INVESTIGATION and INQUEST
On 4 November 2020, I commenced an investigation into the death of
Cecilia Edwards, aged 91 years. The investigation concluded at the end
of the inquest on 18 February 2021. I made a determination of death by
natural causes.
The medical cause of death was:
1a Citrobacter koseri pneumonia and infected pressure sore of
the right elbow complicating with osteomyelitis
1b immobility and malnutrition
1c end stage dementia
2 general frailty
4
CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH
1
Cecilia Edwards was admitted to the Whittington Hospital on Saturday,
26 September 2020 generally unwell, with a severe right elbow infection.
She deteriorated and died in hospital two weeks later.
5
CORONER’S CONCERNS
During the course of the inquest, the evidence revealed matters giving
rise to concern. In my opinion, there is a risk that future deaths will occur
unless action is taken. In the circumstances, it is my statutory duty to
report to you.
The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows.
District nursing care was provided by Whittington Health.
1. On 12 February 2020, a district nurse assessed Ms Edwards’
elbow as a category 3 pressure ulcer, which should have
prompted an immediate referral to the tissue viability nurse.
However, no such referral was made, either by the attending
nurse; the district nurses who visited twice a week over the next
seven months; the frequent care plan reviewers; or the shift co-
ordinator until 22 September 2020.
2. 60% of the district nurses who visited Cecilia Edwards were
agency nurses. This is obviously undesirable in itself, although I
recognise that it may be very difficult to address.
That notwithstanding, the district nurse team manager giving
evidence in court agreed with Ms Edwards’ niece (herself a former
district nurse and health visitor, and her auntie’s longstanding
advocate) that clear protocols would raise standards, make
mistakes less likely and bring the agency staff in as part of the
organisation. Ultimately this would improve patient care.
3. The district nurses who visited Cecilia Edwards needed the
assistance of the two carers to turn her and attend to all her
nursing needs, but sometimes when they visited there were no
carers present and so the nursing care given was incomplete.
The carers attended at set hours four times a day, and so it seems
that the onus was on the nursing team to arrange the twice weekly
visits appropriately.
Sometimes, individual nurses would ring individual carers to make
arrangements, but there was no organisational system to ensure
that nurse and carer visits coincided as a matter of routine.
2
6
ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN
In my opinion, action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I
believe that you have the power to take such action.
7
YOUR RESPONSE
You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date
of this report, namely by 19 April 2021. I, the coroner, may extend the
period.
Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be
taken, setting out the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain
why no action is proposed.
8
COPIES and PUBLICATION
I have sent a copy of my report to the following.
SureCare – provider of carers
HHJ Thomas Teague QC, the Chief Coroner of England & Wales
, niece of Cecilia Edwards
I am also under a duty to send a copy of your response to the Chief
Coroner and all interested persons who in my opinion should receive it.
I may also send a copy of your response to any other person who I
believe may find it useful or of interest.
The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted
or summary form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who
he believes may find it useful or of interest. You may make
representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response, about
the release or the publication of your response.
9
DATE SIGNED BY SENIOR CORONER
22.02.21 ME Hassell
3
1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.
Dr Executive Medical Director Whittington Health NHS Trust Whittington Hospital Magdala Avenue London N19 5NF 15/04/2021 HM Coroner Mary Hassell Senior Coroner Inner North London St Pancras Coroner’s Court Camley Street London N1C 4PP Dear Senior Coroner Hassell, Re: Regulation 28 Prevention of Future Deaths (PFD) I am writing to respond to the Regulation 28 Prevention of Future Deaths (PFD) report for Ms Cecilia Edwards on behalf of the District Nursing service at Whittington Health NHS Trust. Matter of Concern 1 - On 12 February 2020, a district nurse assessed Ms Edwards’ elbow as a category 3 pressure ulcer, which should have prompted an immediate referral to the tissue viability nurse. However, no such referral was made, either by the attending nurse; the district nurses who visited twice a week over the next seven months; the frequent care plan reviewers; or the shift co- ordinator until 22 September 2020. Whittington Health has reviewed the process for referral to the Tissue Viability Nursing service (TVN) and is formally revising the ‘Referral to TVN guidance’ to ensure timely referrals are made based on clinical need and categorisation, and not purely based on categorisation alone. The new guidance will undertake regular audit practice to monitor compliance. The guidance will be formally ratified in August 2021, following consultation with staff. In addition, Whittington District Nursing service is working towards the digitalisation of clinical notes, and the streamlining of documentation to mitigate the risk of key information being missed. At the time of the incident there were three different places where patient information was documented; the home notes (on paper kept in the home), eCommunity (the service’s nurse visits allocation software) and RiO (the electronic patient record keeping system used by most community services in the Trust.) Since January 2021, a new version of eCommunity has been introduced which removes the capability to record clinical notes. Additionally, the service will be moving toward single documentation of the clinical patient information on the community electronic records from September of this year. Therefore, removing the risk of documenting the same information in multiple places this includes patient assessments and care plans. 1 Matter of Concern 2 - 60% of the district nurses who visited Cecilia Edwards were agency nurses. This is obviously undesirable in itself, although I recognise that it may be very difficult to address. That notwithstanding, the district nurse team manager giving evidence in court agreed with Ms Edwards’ niece (herself a former district nurse and health visitor, and her auntie’s longstanding advocate) that clear protocols would raise standards, make mistakes less likely and bring the agency staff in as part of the organisation. Ultimately this would improve patient care. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic acute period (Late February – April 2020), there were significant staffing shortages across the District Nursing service. During this time Whittington Health benefited from having regular temporary staff (bank and agency) which enabled the service to continue providing care to patients who were housebound. The Trust recognises however, that when using agency staff, it is critical that there is continuity of care. Through the improvements to the patient documentation there is a key strand of work in relation to improving continuity of care for all patients and ensuring that allocation of staff to patients includes this and that staff recognise the importance of getting to know their patients and families. This roll- out of the digitalisation patient records and visits allocation programme has involved all staff, permanent and temporary. In addition, the daily handover process has been revised to ensure that all teams across the service have allocated time to attend, including temporary staff. Handover also now includes a specific item for pressure ulcer management. The District Nursing Leads (senior nurses) are monitoring handover on a regular basis to ensure the changes are embedded. Work is also ongoing to recruit to the District Nursing service, both for substantive roles and on the Bank, both locally and internationally. The Trust actively works with agency staff who are regular workers to consider joining the organisation as permanent employees and they are offered several flexible options to meet their personal circumstances. Vacancies are monitored through the Trust divisional reporting structure and at the Trust workforce committee. Matter of Concern 3 - The district nurses who visited Cecilia Edwards needed the assistance of the two carers to turn her and attend to all her nursing needs, but sometimes when they visited there were no carers present and so the nursing care given was incomplete. The carers attended at set hours four times a day, and so it seems that the onus was on the nursing team to arrange the twice weekly visits appropriately. Sometimes, individual nurses would ring individual carers to make arrangements, but there was no organisational system to ensure that nurse and carer visits coincided as a matter of routine. There are robust arrangements established with local social care agencies and the District Nursing service. However, in this case there was a private carer arrangement, funded and organised by the family. This requires an individualised approach by the service to co-ordinate the care with families to meet specific requirements of the patient. The service has reviewed how it works with families in these circumstances and going forward there will be a discussion with the family and the nurse caring for the patient on this. The plan of care and working together will be agreed with the family and service and will be clearly documented in the electronic patient record care plan. 2 This will be monitored on a regular basis by the senior nurses and included in future case note audits and caseload reviews. I hope this information provides you with assurance of the actions the Trust has taken and continues to take to ensure that the Regulation is met. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you would like any further information. Yours sincerely Dr Executive Medical Director Whittington Health NHS Trust Cc: Chief Executive, Whittington Health Chief Nurse and Director of Allied Health Professionals, Whittington Health Chief Operating Officer, Whittington Health , Inspector, Care Quality Commission , Interim Assistant Director of Quality, North Central London CCG , Associate Director of Quality Governance, Whittington Health 3
See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Whittington Health NHS Trust, and how often a new one appears.
What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text
Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.
These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.