Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2023
Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2023-0077, written 27 Feb 2023. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.
| Date of report | 27 Feb 2023 |
|---|---|
| Reference | 2023-0077 |
| Deceased | Kyron Hibbert |
| Coroner | Emma Whitting |
| Coroner area | Bedfordshire and Luton |
| Category | Other related deaths · Child Death (from 2015) |
| Source | judiciary.uk record · original PDF |
| Responses published | 1 |
Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.
Regulation 28: REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS NOTE: This form is to be used after an inquest. REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT DEATHS THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: 1 , Chairman of Trustees, The Forest of Marston Vale Trust 1 CORONER I am Emma WHITTING, Senior Coroner for the coroner area of Bedfordshire and Luton Coroner Service 2 CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. 3 INVESTIGATION and INQUEST On 05 August 2022 I commenced an investigation into the death of Kyron Marcus HIBBERT aged 13. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 26 January 2023. The conclusion of the inquest was that Kyron died as result of Misadventure. 4 CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH During a heatwave whilst spending time with friends at Stewartby Lakes near Marston Moretaine on 29 July 2022, the Deceased, who was unable to swim, at around 18.30 hours, decided to have a turn on the rope swing that was attached to a tree at the lakeside and which the others had been using to enter the water. He took off his shoes, socks and t-shirt and pushed his jogging trousers down to his ankles and, after being swung over the water for a second time, he released hold of the rope and entered the water. He immediately struggled to find his footing or tread water owing to a combination of the depth and coldness of the water as well as the restriction of his trousers. His friends were unable to take hold of him and he quickly became submerged. Emergency services were alerted and after extensive searches he was recovered from the water; his death was confirmed by paramedics at 02.25 hours on 30 July 2022. 5 CORONER’S CONCERNS During the course of the investigation my inquiries revealed matters giving rise to concern. In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths could occur unless action is taken. In the circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows: (brief summary of matters of concern) At the Inquest hearing, The Forest of Marston Vale Trust (‘the Trust’) stated that since Kryon’s death they had taken no further action to address the risks of children drowning at Stewartby Lakes. However, it was clear from the evidence provided that: (1) The specific location where the incident occurred was well known to local children; the Head Ranger also admitted that this location, known as 'Location 5' along with 'Location 7' was known as an area where people would/could enter the water (albeit that Regulation 28 – After Inquest Document Template Updated 30/07/2021 there were signs at both locations indicating that swimming was prohibited). Furthermore, during the recent heatwave, (albeit this was not known to the Trust) local children had been regularly going to Location 5 and using a rope swing they knew to be located there - whilst Rangers do check all areas of the park, including (2) On Friday 29 July 2022, children had been present at the location using the rope swing since at least 2pm and yet their presence and/or the presence of the rope was not discovered Stewartby Lake this is only incidental to their other duties on any given day and checks are not increased around the lake during hot weather (Head Ranger's evidence); (3) At the location where the incident occurred, there are varying depths of water but (other than the general 'No Swimming' Safety Boards) there was no indication of these relative depths provided to visitors. Investigating police observed that there is a ledge of the lake that was waist height on the children (this was seen the video footage taken by the the children on the day of the incident) and that this shallow ledge drops away suddenly into deep water which is believed to be 13 metres deep. It was believed that Kyron had fallen beyond the edge of the shallow area. (4) At the time of the incident, safety/life-saving equipment at the location of the incident was limited to a Safety Board consisting of a throwline in a locked box which required a code from Emergency Services (necessitating a 999 call) to release it. The Head Ranger explained that the previous life safety rings (costing approx. £40.00 each) had not been replaced once the locked throw lines had been installed. The locked throw line was not accessible to the children; although, they had seen the Safety Board as they had approached Location 5 and noted that there was some kind of float inside it, when they had gone to access it when Kyron went into the water they couldn't get the code as their phone battery had died. They reported that the box (Safety Board) "felt very far away from where we were down at the water" . Although since the Inquest, the Trust have indicated that in addition to the locked throw lines on the Safety Boards, traditional safety lines are also to be installed again at Locations 5 and 7; I am concerned that these are to be placed next to the Safety Boards rather than closer to the lakeside. Whilst prompt access to further life-saving equipment may not have altered the outcome in this incident, it might in future incidents. 6 ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you (and/or your organisation) have the power to take such action. 7 YOUR RESPONSE You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, namely by April 24, 2023. I, the coroner, may extend the period. Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed. 8 COPIES and PUBLICATION I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner. I have also sent it to Royal Life Saving Society (RLSS) Red Hill House, 227 London Rd, Worcester. WR5 2JG Central Bedford Safeguarding Children Board (CBSCB) who may find it useful or of interest. I am also under a duty to send a copy of your response to the Chief Coroner and all Regulation 28 – After Inquest Document Template Updated 30/07/2021 interested persons who in my opinion should receive it. I may also send a copy of your response to any person who I believe may find it useful or of interest. The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of interest. You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response about the release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner. 9 Dated: 27/02/2023 Emma WHITTING Senior Coroner for Bedfordshire and Luton Coroner Service Regulation 28 – After Inquest Document Template Updated 30/07/2021
1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.
18 April 2023
HM Senior Coroner for Bedford and Luton
The Court House
Woburn Street
Ampthill
Bedford
Sent by email only
Dear Madam
Kyron Hibbert Deceased
As you will be aware from our previous correspondence we act on behalf of Forest of Marston Vale
Trust (the “Trust”) to whom you issued a Regulation 28 report dated 27th February 2023 following the
inquest into the death of Kyron Hibbert held on 26th January 20223 . Please treat this letter as our
client’s response to your Regulation 28 report. This response has been reviewed and approved by the
Directors of the Trust.
Our client’s responses to the “Matters of Concern” raised by H M Senior Coroner are set out below.
For ease of reference H M Senior Coroner’s comments are italicised and emboldened.
“At the Inquest hearing, The Forest of Marston Vale Trust (‘the Trust’) stated that since
Kyron’s death they had taken no further action to address the risks of children drowning at
Stewartby Lakes.”
At the inquest the Head Ranger of the Trust was asked whether any changes had been made as a
consequence of this accident. She confirmed they had not .In our written submissions to HM Senior
Coroner dated 7th February 2023 we confirmed ;
“The Trust had a duty under Regulation 3 of the Management of Health and Safety
Regulations 1999 to review its risk assessment and safety arrangements in the light of Kyron’s
death. The Trust carried out this review and its conclusion was that the risk assessment in
place at the time of the incident met the legal duty under Regulation 3 in that it was both
suitable and sufficient. Having reviewed matters the Trust decided to continue with the roll out
of the new safety boards around the lake after Kyron’s death. “
DAC Beachcroft
Portwall Place Portwall Lane Bristol BS1 9HS UK (Sat Nav postcode: BS1 6NA)
dir tel: +44 (0) 117 918 2698 tel: +44 (0) 117 918 2000 fax: +44 (0) 117 918 2100
DX 7846 Bristol 1
DAC Beachcroft - an international law firm
DAC Beachcroft LLP is a limited liability partnership registered in England and Wales (registration number OC317852) which is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority
(authorisation number 440774). A list of the members and those designated as partners is available for inspection at our registered office: 25 Walbrook, London EC4N 8AF. We use the word ‘partner’ to
refer to a member of the LLP or an employee or consultant who is a lawyer with equivalent standing and qualifications. Please read our DAC Beachcroft group privacy policy at www.dacbeachcroft.com.
It follows that the action taken by the Trust after the incident was in accordance with its obligations
under the prevailing health and safety legislation.
”However, it was clear from the evidence provided that:
(1) The specific location where the incident occurred was well known to local children; the
Head Ranger also admitted that this location, known as 'Location 5' along with 'Location 7'
was known as an area where people would/could enter the water (albeit that there were signs at
both locations indicating that swimming was prohibited). Furthermore,
during the recent heatwave, (albeit this was not known to the Trust) local children had
been regularly going to Location 5 and using a rope swing they knew to be located there
).
(
The Head Ranger confirmed in evidence , which was in line with the content of documentary evidence
supplied to H M Senior Coroner prior to the inquest, that the Trust was aware of certain locations
where on occasions members of the public had been seen to enter the lake. The documentation
supplied to H M Senior Coroner prior to the inquest confirmed the extensive efforts that had been
made to dissuade people from doing this by reference to physical barriers, warnings/information and
the provision of safety equipment . Safety measures taken on site were supplemented by messages to
the local community on social media.
(2) On Friday 29 July 2022, children had been present at the location using the rope swing
since at least 2pm and yet their presence and/or the presence of the rope was not
discovered (
Stewartby Lake this is only incidental to their other duties on any given day and checks are
not increased around the lake during hot weather (Head Ranger's evidence);
- whilst Rangers do check all areas of the park, including
The Trust’s efforts have always been focussed on preventing people from entering the lake. Suitable
warnings are in place at all public entrances to the park and at various points around the lakeside
perimeter path. It is highly significant that all of the children confirmed they were aware they should not
swim in the lake. Kyron, very sadly, had been given a specific warning from his mother that he could
well drown if he entered the water.
The sheer size ,topography and restricted sight lines render routine visual checks impracticable and
ineffective.
(3) At the location where the incident occurred, there are varying depths of water but
(other than the general 'No Swimming' Safety Boards) there was no indication of these
relative depths provided to visitors. Investigating police observed that there is a ledge of
the lake that was waist height on the children (this was seen the video footage taken by the
the children on the day of the incident) and that this shallow ledge drops away suddenly
into deep water which is believed to be 13 metres deep. It was believed that Kyron had
fallen beyond the edge of the shallow area.
The Trust has not seen the video footage referred to but is aware of this issue at very many points
around the lake . This is one of several reasons why entering the water is forbidden . The risk of
“Hidden Hazards” is specifically identified on safety signage around the lake. As indicated in our
written submission the Trust’s view is that placing signs in the very many deep water areas will create
the impression that those areas that not signed are somehow safe for swimming.
Page 2 of 4
It is important to note in this respect that the Internal Drainage Board is the public body responsible
for surface water management in the entire Marston Vale and specifically responsible for the
management of water levels in Stewartby Lake in its use as a strategic stormwater balancing facility.
This function entails that there can be a 0.75m variation in depth throughout the year. This depth
variation translates into a significant encroachment into shoreline.
(4) At the time of the incident, safety/life-saving equipment at the location of the incident
was limited to a Safety Board consisting of a throwline in a locked box which required a
code from Emergency Services (necessitating a 999 call) to release it. The Head Ranger
explained that the previous life safety rings (costing approx. £40.00 each) had not been
replaced once the locked throw lines had been installed. The locked throw line was not
accessible to the children; although, they had seen the Safety Board as they had
approached Location 5 and noted that there was some kind of float inside it, when they had
gone to access it when Kyron went into the water they couldn't get the code as their phone
battery had died. They reported that the box (Safety Board) "felt very far away from where
we were down at the water" (
have indicated that in addition to the locked throw lines on the Safety Boards, traditional
safety lines are also to be installed again at Locations 5 and 7; I am concerned that these
are to be placed next to the Safety Boards rather than closer to the lakeside. Whilst prompt
access to further life-saving equipment may not have altered the outcome in this incident,
it might in future incidents.
). Although since the Inquest, the Trust
The Head Ranger’s evidence at inquest was that locked throw lines in a number of locations had
replaced unlocked throw lines, not life rings. There were therefore a combination of locked and
unlocked throw lines around the lake at the time of this incident. The design of the locked throw lines
was arrived at following consultation with Bedfordshire Fire and Rescue and reflects that used by the
local authority in the Bedford area. The locked line was accessible to the children if one of them had
followed the instructions on the signage to obtain the access code from the emergency operator. The
written evidence on the issue was that one of the children had no battery power in her phone. It is
highly likely others had mobile phones that were working. It seems reasonable to infer from the
evidence that the fact that Kyron , a non-swimmer, immediately went under the water and did not
resurface meant the children were not seeking rescue equipment.
The Trust has looked at installing additional unlocked throw lines in areas where there are secure
lines in place. It has also considered whether these can be located closer to the edge of the lake .The
locked lines are on the main lakeside walkway where they are most visible to members of the public.
As has been highlighted in evidence and previous written submissions, the water level of the lake
varies significantly throughout the year as the lake is part of the flood defences in the area. We have
described the role of the IDB in response to point 3 above. To illustrate the impact of this on the
shoreline we attach two photographs taken in March 2023 showing the general area where this
incident occurred . It can be seen that the area where the children were playing is completely under
water.
Whilst it is not accepted the secure throw lines were “very far away” from the water , in order to deal
with HM Senior Coroner’s concern on this issue the Trust will install additional unlocked lines closer to
the high water mark of the lake at locations 5 and 7 , and at the other points around the lake and
closer to the edge of the lake in locations where there have been previous incidents of swimming.
These new throw lines with accompanying safety signage will be in place by 1st June 2023.
Page 3 of 4
All at the Trust was devastated by Kyron’s death and it will go above and beyond its legal duty to try
and avoid a similar incident. That said the Trust believes the evidence in this case sadly confirmed the
positioning or availability of life saving equipment would not have altered the fatal outcome of this
case.
As well as installing the new throw lines and signage referred to above , the Trust has resolved to
issue messages to local schools in periods of warm weather warning of the dangers of accessing the
lake, and encouraging them to share this information with their pupils. This will supplement information
already provided by the Trust via social media.
Yours faithfully
Partner
DAC Beachcroft
Page 4 of 4
Gullwatch - Other
Gullwatch 2- from top of bank down to edge. - Other
See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Child Death (from 2015), and how often a new one appears.
What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text
Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.
These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.