Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2023
Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2023-0279, written 25 Jul 2023. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.
| Date of report | 25 Jul 2023 |
|---|---|
| Reference | 2023-0279 |
| Deceased | Paul Keating |
| Coroner | Oliver Longstaff |
| Coroner area | West Yorkshire (Eastern) |
| Category | Other related deaths |
| Source | judiciary.uk record · original PDF |
| Responses published | 2 |
Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.
REGULATION 28: REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS (1) REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: 1. Leeds City Council Civil Litigation and Housing Section, , Principal Legal Officer 2. Deputy Director, Fire Safety, Home Office, 1 CORONER I am Oliver Longstaff, Area Coroner for the Coroner Area of West Yorkshire (Eastern) 2 CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. 3 INVESTIGATION and INQUEST On 28/04/2023 I commenced an investigation into the death of Paul Keating, aged 59 (17/12/1963). The investigation concluded at the end of the Inquest on 20/07/2023. The conclusion of the Inquest was that Mr Keating’s death was accidental, caused by the combined effects of Carbon Monoxide toxicity and Ischaemic Heart Disease. 4 CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH Paul Keating died on 15th April 2023 from the combined effects of carbon monoxide toxicity and pre-existing heart disease in a fire at the flat where he lived alone. The likely cause of the fire was the careless discarding of smoking materials in his bedroom. As he was entitled to, he had declined to allow contractors to install a sprinkler system in his flat when his local authority landlord was seeking to install such systems in all of their high rise properties following the Grenfell Tower disaster. 5 CORONER’S CONCERNS During the course of the Inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action is taken. In the circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows. – [BRIEF SUMMARY OF MATTERS OF CONCERN] (1) Mr Keating lived on the eleventh floor of a 17-storey tower block. His landlord was the local authority. In 2017, following the Grenfell Tower disaster, the local authority undertook a programme of installing sprinkler systems in all the residential tower blocks for which they were responsible, including Mr Keating’s. (2) Being a single private dwelling, albeit in a tower block, Mr Keating’s flat was not covered by the provisions of The Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order 2005. The 1 local authority had no statutory power to enter Mr Keating’s flat for the purposes of installing a sprinkler system without his consent. (3) Over a period of six months during which the sprinkler system was installed in the tower block where Mr Keating lived, he did not respond to letters informing him of the planned installation of the sprinkler system and inviting his agreement to contractors entering his flat as part of that work. He additionally refused to open his door to the tenant liaison officer. (Further, it was discovered after his death that Mr Keating had disabled the hard-wired smoke detector and a battery-operated smoke detector within his flat.) (4) The necessary work was done in the common parts of the building to connect Mr Keating’s flat to the sprinkler system, but the work done could not cross the threshold of his flat without his consent. Of the 98 flats in the building, Mr Keating’s was the only flat not connected to the sprinkler system. (5) If the local authority had had the statutory power to enter Mr Keating’s flat for the purposes of installing the sprinkler system, it would have exercised that power and Mr Keating’s flat would have been connected to that system. (6) Had Mr Keating’s flat been connected to the sprinkler system, it is likely that the system would have been activated by the smouldering soft furnishings in his bedroom and the fire would have been extinguished before he was overwhelmed by carbon monoxide. 6 ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe your organisation has the power to take such action. 7 YOUR RESPONSE You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, namely by 20/09/2023. I, the Coroner, may extend the period. Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed. 8 COPIES and PUBLICATION I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the West Yorkshire Fire & Rescue Service Fire Investigation Team (an interested person for the purposes of the Inquest). I am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response. The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of interest. You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response, about the release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner. 9 25th July 2023 2
2 responses published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.
Deputy Director
Fire Safety Unit
Home Office
2 Marsham Street
London SW1P 4DF
20 September 2023
Oliver Longstaff
Coroner’s Service
West Yorkshire (Eastern) Area
71 Northgate
Wakefield
West Yorkshire
WF1 3BS
Dear Oliver,
Regulation 28: Report to prevent future deaths
I refer to your report dated 25 July 2023 provided in accordance with your
duty under paragraph 7, Schedule 5 of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009
and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013,
following your inquest into the very sad death of Mr Paul Keating. I offer my
sincerest condolences to the family and friends of Mr Keating.
I understand from your report that the inquest concluded that Mr Keating died
from a fire in his home, which was found to have likely been caused by the
discarding of smoking materials. You have raised concern regarding the fire
risks that arose as a consequence of the local authority not having the
necessary powers to enter Mr Keating’s flat to install fire safety precautions
when entry is denied.
In your report you refer to the Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order 2005
(FSO). The purpose of the FSO is to regulate fire safety in workplaces and the
communal parts of multi-occupied -domestic premises (the ‘common parts’).
The FSO is not intended to regulate fire safety inside individual private
dwellings.
In the case of social housing such as Mr Keating’s, the Housing Health and
Safety Rating System (HHSRS) applies. The HHSRS, set out in secondary
legislation under the Housing Act 2004 and introduced in 2006, is a technical
risk-based tool used by local authorities to assess the condition of residential
premises. It can be applied to a whole building (e.g. all private dwellings and
all common parts) or to part of a building (e.g. an individual private dwelling).
An HHSRS assessment covers 29 potential hazards, including fire, and
categorises them by seriousness.
The Decent Homes Standard sets the minimum standards that social homes
are required to meet. To meet it, the standard that all social housing (including
local authority-owned stock) must achieve, a dwelling must be free from
hazards at the most dangerous ‘category 1’ level that is assessed using the
aforementioned HHSRS. In addition, where a dwelling is privately rented or
rented from a housing association, local authorities have a duty to enforce if
they identify category 1 hazards, and a discretionary power to enforce where
less serious category 2 hazards are assessed. The decision whether to
enforce in respect of a category 2 hazard should be taken in accordance with
the local authority’s enforcement policy. The actions available to the local
authority include powers to require remedial works, prohibit the use of part or
all of a building or carry out emergency works themselves.
Turning to the specific issue of the local authority’s ability to access the
property to carry out works, the Pre-Action Protocol (PAP) for Housing
Conditions Claims (England) has been published by the Ministry of Justice to
promote the speedy and appropriate carrying out of any remedial works which
are the landlord’s responsibility and avoid unnecessary legal action. Section
7.6 of the PAP, which relates to access, states that ‘Tenants must allow the
landlord reasonable access for inspection and the carrying out of works in
accordance with the tenancy agreement’.
Also relevant is the important role that Fire and Rescue Authorities (FRAs)
must play in relation to the prevention of fires and ensuring public safety.
Section 6 of the Fire and Rescue Services Act 2004 requires FRAs to make
provision to promote fire safety in its area. FRAs meet this requirement
through a range of activity, including through Home Fire Safety Visits. These
visits see fire service personnel visit vulnerable people in their own homes to
provide them with tailored fire safety advice. Where risks are identified which
cannot be addressed by the FRA, they will work closely with other local public
services, such as multi-agency safeguarding hubs, to ensure appropriate
action is taken.
The Home Office also funds the Fire Kills campaign to promote domestic fire
safety messages to the general public, and particularly those groups we know
to be most at risk should a fire in the home occur. The campaign raises
awareness of the importance of installing and regularly testing smoke alarms
and, crucially, the behaviours and actions they can take to reduce the risk of a
domestic fire.
Taken together, these measures provide a basis for action to be taken and
support residents, such as Mr Keating, with improving fire safety.
Yours sincerely,
Deputy Director
Fire Safety Unit
Home Office
Oliver Longstaff
HM Area Coroner - West Yorkshire (Eastern)
Wakefield Coroner’s Court
71 Northgate
Wakefield
WF1 3BS
Sent by email
Customer Relations
FREEPOST RLZR-ELTX-RUEH
Leeds City Council
PO Box 657
Leeds
LS1 9BS
Date: 06 September 2023
Dear Mr Longstaff
Inquest into the death of Paul Keating
Regulation 28 Report to Prevent Future Deaths
Thank you for your report dated 25 July 2023 in respect of concerns arising out of the
inquest into the sad death of Mr Keating on 15 April 2023. I write to respond to that report on
behalf of the Council.
I would firstly wish to say that I was very sad to hear of the fact and circumstances of Mr
Keating’s death and would wish to pass on my condolences to his family and all those
affected by these events.
As your report recognises, since 2017 Leeds City Council has adopted a proactive approach
to improving fire safety within its tower blocks, following the Grenfell tragedy. This included
installing sprinkler systems in those tower blocks. These sprinklers are intended to cover not
only the common parts of the buildings, which fall within the scope of the Regulatory Reform
(Fire Safety) Order 2005 (as amended by the Fire Safety Act 2021), but also individual flats
within the blocks, which are outside the scope of the 2005 order.
Regrettably despite the Council’s extensive efforts to obtain access for the installation of
sprinklers into Mr Keating’s flat, no such access was given, as your report outlines.
Because the works to install sprinklers would be deemed to be improvement works rather
than repair or emergency works, and because sprinklers are not currently a legal
requirement inside individual flats, the Council did not have legal powers to gain entry
against Mr Keating’s wishes to carry out these works. This is the main area of concern
raised in your report.
www.leeds.gov.uk
The granting of additional legal powers to landlords, in order to permit them to carry out
safety works without the tenant’s consent, is a matter over which the Council has no control
but falls to be considered by central government, and I note that the report was also
addressed to the Home Office. I would however like to endorse your concerns as expressed
in paragraphs 5 and 6 of the Matters of Concern.
A copy of this response will be provided to the Home Officer for their information.
I would like to thank you again for your report raising these concerns.
Yours sincerely
Chief Officer - Housing
www.leeds.gov.uk
See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Oliver Longstaff, and how often a new one appears.
What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text
Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.
These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.