Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2023

Jonathan McCarthy

Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2023-0402, written 24 Oct 2023. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.

Date of report24 Oct 2023
Reference2023-0402
DeceasedJonathan McCarthy
CoronerHassan Shah
Coroner areaNorthampton
CategoryState Custody related deaths
Sourcejudiciary.uk record · original PDF
Responses published1

The report

Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.

REGULATION 28 REPORT ON ACTION TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS 

THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: 

A. NHS England, PO Box 16738, Redditch, B97 9PT
B. Chief Executive Officer Practice Plus Group (PPG) Hawker House 5-6

Napier Road Reading Berkshire RG1 8BW

C. Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for the Ministry of Justice, 102

Petty France, London SW1H 9AJ,

D. Serco Group plc,  Serco House, 16 Bartley Wood Business Park, Bartley
Way, Hook, Hampshire, RG27 9UY (responsible for HMP Thameside)

1 

CORONER 

I am Mr Hassan Shah, Assistant Coroner for the coroner area of Northampton. 

2 

CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS 

I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5 of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 
and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (investigations) Regulations 2013. 

3 

INVESTIGATION and INQUEST 
On 08/11/2018 I commenced an investigation into the death of Mr Jonathan Michael 
McCarthy (“Mr McCarthy”). The investigation concluded at the end of an inquest on 
12/10/2023. I recorded the conclusion as natural causes. 

The medical cause of death was:- 

1a - Bronchopneumonia and multi organ failure 
1b - Acute cardiac arrhythmia (with initial resuscitation)  
1c - Myocardial fibrosis (related to drug and alcohol abuse) 

4 

CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH 

Mr  McCarthy  died  on  12th  August  2018  at  University  Hospital  Coventry  and 
Warwickshire  as  a  result  of  a  cardiac  arrhythmia  whilst  at  HMP  Onley.  The  arrhythmia 
occurred as result of scarring of the heart. 

5  CORONER’S CONCERNS 

Upon Mr McCarthy’s arrival at HMP Altcourse on 5 June 2017, it is recorded that he had 
an  outstanding  hospital  appointment.  There  was  no  evidence  that  HMP  Altcourse  took 
any steps to verify this appointment.   

Mr McCarthy was transferred to HMP Thameside on 7 May 2018.  It is recorded that he 
had  an  appointment  to  see  the  cardiologist  at  Whittington  Hospital  on  13  June  2018. 
There was no evidence that HMP Thameside took any steps to verify this appointment. 
He was transferred from the prison on the next day, 14th June 2018. 

It  was  suggested  in  evidence  that  HMP  Thameside  automatically  re-arrange  all 
community  medical  appointments  for  security  reasons.  It  was  clarified  that  the  prison 
would only try to get a new appointment if there was a specific security concern. 

1 

 There was also no evidence that Mr McCarthy had a fitness to transfer assessment at 
either HMP Altcourse or HMP Thameside. 

In light of these matters, I consider that a Regulation 28 report is required in relation to 
the policies and procedures for: - 

1.  verifying a prisoner’s pre-existing community hospital appointments. 
2.  determining  the  clinical  importance/urgency  of  pre-existing  community 
impact  of  security  issues  upon  this 

hospital  appointments  and  the 
assessment. 

3.  assessing fitness to transfer and determining medical hold. 

6 

ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN 

In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you AND/OR 
your organisation, have the power to take such action.  

7 

YOUR RESPONSE 

You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, 
namely by Thursday 7th December 2023. I, the coroner, may extend the period. 

Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out 
the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed. 

8 

COPIES and PUBLICATION 

I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested 
Persons:-.  

a) 
 (Spouse of Mr McCarthy). 
b)  HM Prisons and Probation Service (HMPPS) 
c)  Northamptonshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust 
d)  Prisons and Probate Ombudsman 

Similarly, you are under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response.  

The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary 
form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful 
or of interest. You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your 
response, about the release or the publication of your response. 

9  H Shah – Mr H Shah – Assistant Coroner 

2

Responses

1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.

Response from Practice Plus Group (PDF)
Practice Plus Group 
Hawker House 
5-6 Napier Court 
Napier Road 
Reading 
Berkshire 
RG1 8BW 

practiceplusgroup.com 

Assistant Coroner Hassan Shah  
Northampton Coroner’s service 

15 December 2023 

Dear Sir 

The Inquest touching upon the death of Mr Jonathan McCarthy 

We  write  further  to  your  Report  to  Prevent  Future  Deaths  issued  pursuant  to  Regulation  28 
Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013 dated 12 October 2023 and following the inquest 
touching upon the death of Mr McCarthy, who sadly passed away on 12 August 2018 whilst 
residing at HMP Onley.   

I  would  like  to  take  the  opportunity  on  behalf  of  Practice  Plus  Group  to  offer  my  sincere 
condolences to Mr McCarthy’s family and friends for their loss.  

This letter addresses the matters of concern insofar as they relate to Practice Plus Group (PPG). 
As you are aware, PPG were not the healthcare provider at the time of Mr McCarthy’s death at 
either HMP Thameside or HMP Onley, however PPG have since started providing healthcare 
at both these sites. 

Matter of Concern  

We note that you have the following concerns: 

Upon Mr McCarthy’s arrival at HMP Altcourse on 5 June 2017, it is recorded that he had an 
outstanding hospital appointment. There was no evidence that HMP Altcourse took any steps 
to verify this appointment.   

Mr McCarthy was transferred to HMP Thameside on 7 May 2018.  It is recorded that he had an 
appointment  to  see  the cardiologist  at Whittington  Hospital  on  13  June  2018.  There  was  no 
evidence that HMP Thameside took any steps to verify this appointment. He was transferred 
from the prison on the next day, 14th June 2018. 

It  was  suggested  in  evidence  that  HMP  Thameside  automatically  re-arrange  all  community 
medical appointments for security reasons. It was clarified that the prison would only try to get 
a new appointment if there was a specific security concern. 

There was also no evidence that Mr McCarthy had a fitness to transfer assessment at either 

Practice Plus Group Health and Rehabilitation Services Limited. Registered in England No 10498997 
Registered Office: Hawker House, 5-6 Napier Court, Napier Road, Reading, Berkshire RG1 8BW 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 HMP Altcourse or HMP Thameside. 

In light of these matters, you consider that a Regulation 28 report is required in relation to the 
policies and procedures for: - 

1.  verifying a prisoner’s pre-existing community hospital appointments. 

2.  determining  the  clinical  importance/urgency  of  pre-existing  community  hospital 

appointments and the impact of security issues upon this assessment. 

3.  assessing fitness to transfer and determining medical hold. 

Response 

Pre-Existing Appointments 

When a patient arrives into the prison a healthcare practitioner undertakes a first night screen, 
this consists of a face to face assessment of the patient establishing all pre-existing medical 
conditions and current risk. SystmOne is used to help inform this assessment. This assessment 
is known as the initial reception screening and forms part of the process for all new admissions. 

As part of this reception process, any pre-existing external appointments are identified on arrival 
into  the  prison.  This  is  identified  through  either  checking  the  patients’  medical  records, 
information  from  the  sending  prison  or  confirmation  from  the  patient  himself.  Once  an 
appointment is identified the healthcare practitioner will alert the administration team that there 
are outstanding hospital appointments. The administration team will then make contact with the 
hospital, or other external agency, to ascertain details of the appointment if this is not already 
available.  

If the patient has transferred in from another prison establishment then they would not be aware 
of the date of any external appointments. As noted at the Inquest, this is for security reasons. 
In  such  circumstances  it  is  much  easier  for  the  appointment  to  be  kept  and  it  would  not  be 
cancelled  for  any  security  reason.  Contact  would  still  be  made  with  the  external  provider  to 
ensure that the appointment is still scheduled and then the prison would be informed accordingly 
so that escorts can be arranged. Escorts to external appointments fall to the prison and is not 
the responsibility of healthcare. 

If  the  patient  has  transferred  from  another  prison  but the  hospital  is too far to  travel for then 
these appointments are cancelled by the admin team and a task sent to the GP to inform them 
that the patient needs referring to the local hospital. Where new appointments are scheduled, 
the  patient  is  not  informed  until the  day  of the  appointment.  This  is standard  practice  due to 
security. 

Where a patient is admitted into prison from the community they will often already be aware of 
any  outstanding  appointments.  In  this  case,  the  external  provider  will  be  contacted  to  see 
whether the appointment can be carried out over the phone or via video link. This ensures that 
the appointment goes ahead as scheduled without the security risks of being escorted in person. 
If this is not possible for any reason then the appointment will be rescheduled. However, patients 
with external appointments are highlighted to the GP/ANP or senior nurse to clinically triage to 
ensure that nothing is missed and that their needs are met. If the appointment can be serviced 
within the prison then this will be carried out. Any urgent appointments will be discussed with 
the hospital and an urgent re-referral completed. 

All appointments are recorded on SystmOne by the admin team when they are made so that all 
staff can see the appointments. The prison are informed in advance of external escorts that are 

Page 2 of 4 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 needed where, when and type of transport required. Prison staff are given as much notice as 
possible.  

HMP Thameside have developed a Transfer of Care LOP regarding the transfer in and out of 
patients. Included in this is details regarding external appointments.  

Determining Clinical Importance 

As  part  of  the  LOP  noted  above,  HMP  Thameside  have  put  in  place  a  process  in  which  all 
patients who arrive with external appointments are highlighted to the GP/ANP or senior nurse 
to clinically triage. When considering the urgency of the appointment, multiple factors are taken 
into  consideration.  This  includes  what  the  appointment  is for,  whether  it  can  be  delivered  on 
site, and if it needs transferring to a local hospital. Once a priority category has been has been 
allocated,  admin  are  informed  whether  the  appointment  needs  to  be  kept,  can  be  moved  to 
remote or can be cancelled and re-referred. The priority categories are urgent, routine and non-
urgent or follow up.  

If  an  urgent  appointment  has  to  be  cancelled,  this  would  be  recorded  on  SystmOne  and  an 
urgent task sent through SystmOne to the senior clinician to follow this up. The hospital would 
be  contacted  to  discuss  and  an  urgent  re-referral  completed.  The  prison  are  advised  of  all 
escorts that cannot be cancelled. All escorts are discussed as part of the daily briefing which is 
a joint meeting which all staff attend. The cancellation of appointments is not undertaken without 
clinical consultation, and as previously noted, all patients affected will be seen by a GP/ANP or 
senior nurse to ensure their needs are met.  

Those undergoing treatment at a local hospital would be placed on “Medical Hold” in order for 
the treatment to be completed. If a patient has to be transferred, a Transfer of Care letter is sent 
with  them  to their  new  establishment  which  includes  all  appointments  and  reasons  for them. 
This process is documented in the Transfer of Care LOP, which all staff have been made aware 
of. Our transfer process is detailed further below.  

If an appointment has to be re-booked, this is followed up by the admin team any concerns are 
escalated to the clinician who referred. In January 2024 HMP Thameside will be using the NHS’ 
Electronic Referral System that will ensure all referrals are logged. The admin team will then be 
able to track these more easily.  

Assessment Fitness to Transfer 

All  patients  will  have  a  fitness  to  transfer  assessment  undertaken  prior  to  transfer  to  any 
establishment or court, this is recorded on SystmOne and forms part of the transfer process. 
Healthcare are generally notified 24 hours prior to release or transfer of a patient. This can vary 
depending on external factors such as Court listings and timings.   

All patients transferred from HMP Thameside will have a transfer document sent with them to 
the receiving prison, which will include future external appointments. This has been launched 
as part of the new transfer process implemented by PPG in November 2023. This new process 
has  been  implemented  to  ensure  that  the  transfer  of  patients  is  safe  and  that  all  relevant 
information  is  easily  accessible  to  the  new  establishment.  The  transfer  assessment  is 
undertaken face to face and the document is partially completed prior to the consultation using 
the information from SystmOne. As noted above and during the inquest, “Medical Hold” will be 
utilised to ensure that those patients booked for urgent or specialised treatments/appointments 
are  not  transferred  until  such  time  as  the  treatment  or  appointment  has  taken  place.  For 
example, those having cancer care at specialised hospitals would be placed on Medical Hold. 

Page 3 of 4 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Medical Holds are communicated directly with the prison and reviewed on a regular basis by 
healthcare. 

Practice Plus Group is committed to ensuring the high quality provision of healthcare services 
to all prisoners at HMP Thameside. We will also ensure that the lessons learnt as a result of 
this inquest are shared across all of Practice Plus Group’s services. We can confirm that this 
has  specifically  been  shared  with the  Heads  of Healthcare  at  both  HMP  Altcourse  and  HMP 
Onley to ensure that similar processes and lessons can be learned. 

I  do  hope  that  this  letter  provided  the  necessary  reassurance  sought  and  if  I  can  be  of  any 
further assistance you should not hesitate to contact me directly. 

Yours sincerely 

National Medical Director, Health in Justice, Practice Plus Group 

Page 4 of 4

Related reports

Other reports by Hassan Shah

See all →

More reports categorised “State Custody related deaths”

See all →

Track State Custody related deaths

See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching State Custody related deaths, and how often a new one appears.

What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text

Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.

These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.