Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2023

Michael Hindes

Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2023-0521, written 20 Oct 2023. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.

Date of report20 Oct 2023
Reference2023-0521
DeceasedMichael Hindes
CoronerMary Hassell
Coroner areaInner North London
CategorySuicide (from 2015)
Sourcejudiciary.uk record · original PDF
Responses published1

The report

Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.

Regulation 28:  Prevention of Future Deaths report 

Michael Joseph HINDES (died 15.05.23) 

THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: 

1. 

Medical Director 
South West London & St George’s Mental Health NHS Trust 
Trinity Building  
Springfield University Hospital 
15 Springfield Drive 
London SW17 0YF 

1 

CORONER 

I am:   Coroner ME Hassell 
           Senior Coroner  
           Inner North London 
           St Pancras Coroner’s Court 
           Camley Street 
           London  N1C 4PP 

2 

CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS 

I make this report under the Coroners and Justice Act 2009,  
paragraph 7, Schedule 5, and  
The Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013, 
regulations 28 and 29. 

3 

INVESTIGATION and INQUEST 

On  17  May  2023,  one  of  my  assistant  coroners,  Edwin  Buckett, 
commenced an investigation into the death of Michael Hindes, aged 26 
years.  The  investigation  concluded  at  the  end  of  the  inquest  on  17 
October 2023.  I made a narrative determination, which I attach. 

4 

CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH 

Michael Hindes killed himself 
.  
One week before he died, he called 999 because he felt suicidal.  This 
was late in the evening on Monday, 8 May.  Police attended and  took 
him  to  St  George’s  Hospital,  where  he  underwent  a  half  hour  mental 
health assessment, after which he was discharged in the early hours. 

1 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 5 

CORONER’S CONCERNS 

During the course of the inquest, the evidence revealed matters giving 
rise to concern. In my opinion, there is a risk that future deaths will occur 
unless  action  is  taken.  In  the  circumstances,  it  is  my  statutory  duty  to 
report to you. 

The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows.  

When Michael was taken to St George’s Hospital, he explained that he 
had  been  back  and  forth  from  the  railway  station,  each

He was discharged with a plan for follow up by the community mental 
health  team  (CMHT).    I  was  told  that  the  local  CMHT  meets  at  the 
beginning of every week, and then there is sometimes a delay before an 
appointment is made, so it was likely that Michael would have to wait an 
absolute minimum of a week to be seen. 

In the meantime, it was not thought necessary to refer him to the crisis 
team. 

Michael’s family knew nothing of his mental ill health.  He declined  an 
invitation by the nurse assessing him to contact them.  He did not want 
to  worry  them.    Despite  her  awareness  of  the  multiple  therapeutic 
benefits of the input of a patient’s loved ones, the assessing nurse did 
not in any way try to persuade Michael to allow her to do this. 

The  first  that  Michael’s  family  heard  of  Michael’s  mental  ill health  was 
when they heard of his death.  I am sure that, had they been made aware 
of  it  while  he  was  still  alive,  they  would  have  done  everything  in  their 
power to support him and to engage with the mental health services. 

Families very often complain to me at inquest that mental health services 
have not done enough to try to bring them in to a patient’s care.  In spite 
of the frequency of this occurrence, the lesson does not seem to be being 
learnt.  

When you respond to this letter, I should be grateful to know not just what 
you have done to address the issue in your own trust, but also what you 
have done to raise national awareness. 

6 

ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN 

In  my  opinion,  action  should  be  taken  to  prevent  future  deaths  and  I 
believe that you have the power to take such action.  

2 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 7 

YOUR RESPONSE 

You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date 
of this report, namely by 18 December 2023.  I, the coroner, may extend 
the period. 

Your  response  must  contain  details  of  action  taken  or proposed  to  be 
taken, setting out the timetable for action. Otherwise, you must explain 
why no action is proposed. 

8 

COPIES and PUBLICATION 

I have sent a copy of my report to the following. 

•  The Hindes family 
•  The Care Quality Commission for England   
•  HHJ Thomas Teague QC, the Chief Coroner of England & Wales 

I  am  also  under  a  duty  to  send  a  copy  of  your  response  to  the  Chief 
Coroner and all interested persons who in my opinion should receive it.  
I  may  also  send  a  copy  of  your  response  to  any  other  person  who  I 
believe may find it useful or of interest.  

The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted 
or summary form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who 
he  believes  may  find  it  useful  or  of  interest.  You  may  make 
representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response, about 
the release or the publication of your response. 

9 

DATE                                                  SIGNED BY SENIOR CORONER 

20.10.23                                              ME Hassell 

3

Responses

1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.

Response from South West London and St Georges Mental Health (PDF)
Chief Executive’s Office 
South West London and St George’s Mental Health NHS Trust 
Trinity Building 

Springfield University Hospital   
15 Springfield Drive   
London SW17 0YF 

19 December 2023 

Private & Confidential 

ME Hassell 
Senior Coroner for Inner West London 
West London Coroner Service 
St Pancras Coroner’s Court 
Camley Street 
London N1C 4PP 

Dear Madam 

Our Reference: 

Re: Regulation 28 Report to Prevent Future Deaths – Mr Michael Joseph HINDES 

I  am  writing  to  you  following  receipt  of  the  Regulation  28:  Report  to  Prevent  Future 
Deaths (PFD) dated 20 October 2023, which was issued to the Trust on 13 December 
2023, regarding the sad death of Mr Michael Hindes, who died on 15 May 2023. 

You have requested that South West London and St George’s Mental Health NHS Trust 
(SWLStG)  respond  to  the  matters  of  concern  that  you  have  detailed  in  your 
correspondence.  

I have included your Matters of Concern below and our subsequent response.  

The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows:  

‘When Michael was taken to St George’s Hospital, he explained that he had been back 
and forth from the railway station, each time for the purpose of jumping in front of a train.  
He  was  discharged  with  a  plan  for  follow  up  by  the  community  mental  health  team 
(CMHT). I was told that the local CMHT meets at the beginning of every week, and then 
there is sometimes a delay before an appointment is made, so it was likely that Michael 
would have to wait an absolute minimum of a week to be seen.  

In the meantime, it was not thought necessary to refer him to the crisis team.  

 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Michael’s  family  knew  nothing  of  his  mental  ill  health.  He  declined  an  invitation  by  the 
nurse  assessing  him  to  contact  them.  He  did  not  want  to  worry  them.  Despite  her 
awareness of the multiple therapeutic benefits of the input of a patient’s loved ones, the 
assessing nurse did not in any way try to persuade Michael to allow her to do this. 

The first that Michael’s family heard of Michael’s mental ill health was when they heard of 
his death. I am sure that, had they been made aware of it while he was still alive, they 
would have done everything in their power to support him and to engage with the mental 
health services. 

Families very often complain to me at inquest that mental health services have not done 
enough  to  try  to  bring  them  in  to  a  patient’s  care.  In  spite  of  the  frequency  of  this 
occurrence, the lesson does not seem to be being learnt. 

When you respond to this letter, I should be grateful to know not just what you have done 
to  address  the  issue  in  your  own  trust,  but  also  what  you  have  done  to  raise  national 
awareness.’ 

As you are aware through the Inquest, the clinical risk assessment undertaken at the 
time by the assessing nurse in the Psychiatric Liaison Team deemed the patient to be 
of low risk of self-harm and that he was suitable to be discharged home. In addition, with 
a  routine  referral  to  the  Community  Mental  Health  Team  (CMHT)  for  ongoing 
diagnosis/further assessment, as crisis services were not required at that time.  

The  clinical  assessment  clearly  concluded  that  the  patient  had  capacity  to  make 
decisions and the assessing nurse was of the firm view that he was clear that he did not 
consent  to  information  being  shared  with  his  family  around  his  mental  health  and 
struggles.     

In these circumstances it would therefore have been unlawful not to respect the patient’s 
decision  and  there  is  a  delicate  balance  around  applying  persuasion  and  respecting 
someone’s  rights  and  decisions.    However,  we  recognise  we  should  have  sought  to 
explore his decision further and to  relay the typical benefits of support that can come 
from  positive  family  engagement  and  awareness,  or  explored  other  support  options, 
such  as  reaching  out  to  a  close  friend.      We  also  absolutely  recognise  that  our 
documentation around this area was not sufficient.  

We  agree  with  your  general  view  that  challenges  remain  and  there  is  a  need  for 
improvements  around  how  to  best  ensure  positive  engagement  and  sharing  of 
information  between  the  healthcare  provider,  patients,  and  their  families  and  carers.     
We are committed to the national ‘Triangle of Care’ initiative that champions the bringing 
together  of  carers  and  relatives,  service  users  and  professionals.  It  aims  to 
promote safety,  aid recovery,  and  sustain  the  wellbeing  of people  with  mental  health 
issues and their carers and families.  This remains a key area of focus for the Trust.  The 
Psychiatric  Liaison  Team  continue  to  reflect  on  this  and  will  be  changing  their  local 

 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 protocols to strengthen the prompts to help remind clinicians how best to approach this 
subject with patients.  

As  per  your  request  with  the  PFD  to  raise  awareness  of  this  area,  we  will  take  the 
opportunity to raise awareness within the Trust via a specific newsletter article issued to 
Trust staff (known as our Monthly Learning Bulletin) to remind and promote how and 
when to best ensure there are meaningful conversations with patients around sharing 
information with families.  This will focus on the Triangle of Care approach and provide 
clarity around the delicate balance between encouraging patients whilst respecting their 
wishes and ensuring this is clearly documented.  This will be developed and issued by 
March 2024.  

We will share this and our response to the PFD with the CQC and our Commissioners 
(Integrated  Care  System)  as  per  your  wish  to  help  contribute  to  improving  greater 
awareness of this area.  

We thank you for your consideration and commitment to prevention of future deaths and 
helping us and the wider NHS to learn.   

I would like to express our deep sympathy to the family and friends of Mr Michael Hindes 
for  their  loss.  While  we  seek  to  learn  from  this  incident,  I  recognise  that  this  cannot 
diminish their pain and anguish.  

The Trust remains committed to continuous learning and improvement and we are 
very grateful for all those involved in this Inquest.   

Yours faithfully 

Director of Nursing and Quality, on behalf of 

, Chief Executive 

CC – 

, Medical Director, SWLStG

Related reports

Other reports by Mary Hassell

See all →

More reports categorised “Suicide (from 2015)”

See all →

Track Suicide (from 2015)

See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Suicide (from 2015), and how often a new one appears.

What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text

Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.

These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.