Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2023

Karmchand Gulzar

Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2023-0550, written 29 Dec 2023. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.

Date of report29 Dec 2023
Reference2023-0550
DeceasedKarmchand Gulzar
CoronerMichael Pemberton
Coroner areaBlack Country
CategoryHospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths
Organisation namedSandwell and West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust
Sourcejudiciary.uk record · original PDF
Responses published1

The report

Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.

Zafar Siddique Senior Coroner   
Joanne Lees Area Coroner 

THE BLACK COUNTRY CORONERS 
COURT 
Jack Judge House 
Halesowen Street 
Oldbury, B69 2AJ 

Date: 29 December 2023 

REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS 

THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO:  Sandwell and Birmingham NHS Trust 

CORONER 

1 

I am Michael James Pemberton HM Assistant Coroner for The Black Country 
Coroners Jurisdiction 

CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS 

2 

I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 
2009 and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. 

http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2009/25/schedule/5/paragraph/7 

http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2013/1629/part/7/made 

INVESTIGATION and INQUEST 

3 

On 26 September 2022  an investigation was commenced into the death 
of Karmchand GULZAR. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 
13 December 2023. The findings and conclusion of the inquest were 

  
  
 
  
 
 
 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
 
  
   
  
 
  
  
  
  
  
 
 
 
 Mr Karmchand Gulzar died at Sandwell hospital on 24 September 2022 during the 
course of an emergency operation to treat dilated large bowel. There had been a 
delay in obtaining a CT scan which showed the extent of the condition, meaning 
that the prospects of surviving surgery had reduced significantly by the time of the 
operation. Other warning signs of the significance of the surgical abdomen 
obstruction were not noted including a lactate level of 5 showing that Mr Gulzar 
was deteriorating. An immediate surgical review was not undertaken. These 
matters contributed more than minimally to Mr Gulzar’s death. 

Natural Causes contributed to by neglect. 

1a   Multiorgan Failure 

1b   Sigmoid Tumor causing Large Bowel Obstruction 

1c    

 II    Schizophrenia 

CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH 

On 23rd September 2022, Karmchand was taken from his secure care home 
where he was a resident under a Mental Health Act Section to Sandwell Hospital 
with features of abdominal distension and pain. A member of staff was with him. 
On arrival he was triaged at 11:01 and assessed by a physician associate at 
13:34. This was reviewed by the Emergency Medicine Consultant and a diagnosis 
of acute intestinal obstruction was made based on the clinical assessment and x-
ray of the abdomen which showed distended bowel loops. He was deemed stable 
and was referred to the nurse co-ordinator on the Surgical Assessment Unit (SAU) 
at 14:30. Evidence was provided at the inquest that the NELA (National 
emergency laparotomy audit) risk of death score was 2.3% at this time of referral. 

4 

Crucially no CT scan was undertaken which would have provided better resolution 
and information on the presenting condition. Evidence was given at the inquest 
that this would form basic medical treatment for an acute intestinal obstruction and 
consideration of an abdominal emergency laparotomy. Later under examination 
from the trust representative, the witness recanted slightly on this stating that more 
junior doctors may not be minded to seek a  CT scan, and commented surprisingly 
that requesting a scan by a consultant in the Emergency department could not be 
guaranteed.  

I received evidence in the form of the serious incident report that there were 
nursing shortages on that day and that the department was under considerable 
pressure. No surgical referral had been made. Concerns were raised that 
observations were not completed on time and I heard evidence from family 
members that their concerns about Karmchand and the pain he was suffering were 
not taken on board by staff. The SI report noted that there were difficulties in 
assessing his condition due to his mental health difficulties meaning that he could 

 
 not express pain to staff as easily. His family and staff who knew him raised 
concerns, but adequate notice does not appear to have been taken.. 

At 20:30 Karmchand Deteriorated with decreasing level of consciousness and 
oxygen saturations and was escalated to the ED registrar and transferred to the 
resuscitation area where he was intubated and taken for CT scan at 22:00. The CT 
scan demonstrated dilated large bowel and a decision was taken for him to have 
urgent surgery 

The delay in seeking a CT scan, which did not occur until that evening meant that 
surgery to treat the bowel distention only occurred much later into the evening and 
into the early morning of 24 September 2022. By this time, the NELA risk 
assessment had increased from 2.3% to 52% in other words, death was more 
likely to occur at that point of surgery than earlier in the day. 

Mr Gulzar died during surgery in the early hours of 24 September 2022. 

CORONER’S CONCERNS 

During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to 
concern. In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action is 
taken. In the circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. 

The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows.  – 

(1) Karmchand was referred to the surgical nursing team instead of the surgical 

registrar or surgical on-call team, as required by the Emergency 
Department to surgical registrar referral pathway from a previous SI where it 
had been identified as an issue. This was not followed in this case, leading 
to a delay in surgery and increased risk of death. I am concerned that the 
surgical registrar referral pathway is not being utilised despite previous 
incidents in which its use was highlighted as necessary. 

5 

(2) No CT scan was undertaken as required by the acute abdominal pathway 

and guidance as part of the initial assessment. I was concerned by 
evidence that a CT scan would not be undertaken urgently as part of an 
acute abdominal presentation and that the necessity for a scan may not be 
known by junior (or some consultant) doctors. 

(3) The deterioration in Karmchand’s condition was not recognised due to 
difficulties in communication of pain due to his mental health condition. 
Concerns raised by his carers and family who knew him best and his 
presentation were not given adequate weight. A previous SI was reported to 
have raised this issue, but no action point or plan was provided in the 
current report to set out how staff could improve the assessment of patients 
with communication difficulties, by using observations and relying on people 
who better knew their demeanour and presentation. 

 
  
 
  
 
 ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN 

6 

In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you 
have the power to take such action. 

7 

8 

9 

YOUR RESPONSE 

You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this 
report, namely by 23 February 2024. I, the coroner, may extend the period. 

Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, 
setting out the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is 
proposed. 
COPIES and PUBLICATION 

I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following 
Interested Persons  

1 – 

 – Brother on behalf of the Family 

2 – Sandwell and Brimingham NHS Trust.  

I have also sent it to NHS England who may find it useful or of interest. 

I am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response. 

The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or 
summary form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes 
may find it useful or of interest. You may make representations to me, the coroner, 
at the time of your response, about the release or the publication of your response 
by the Chief Coroner. 

29 December 2023 

Signature 

Michael Pemberton Assistant Coroner for The Black Country Jurisdiction

Responses

1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.

Response from Sandwell and West Birmingham NHS Trust (PDF)
Trust Headquarters 
Health and Wellbeing Centre 
Sandwell General Hospital 
Lyndon 
West Bromwich 
B71 4HJ 

29th February 2024 

Mr Michael Pemberton 
Assistant Coroner 
Black Country Coroner’s Court 
Jack Judge House 
Halesowen Street 
Oldbury 
B69 2AJ 

Dear Mr Pemberton, 

Re:  Mr Karmchand Gulzar (deceased) 

Inquest: Black Country Coroner’s Court – 13 December 2023 

Thank  you  for  your  Prevention  of  Future  Deaths  letter  of  the  29  December  2023  raising  the 
concerns you have regarding the care pathway for acute abdominal conditions at Sandwell and 
West Birmingham NHS Trust. I would like to assure you that since this very sad case the Trust has 
continued to make improvements to the pathway which should now resolve the issues you have 
raised. 

The Management of Acute Abdomen guideline that was in use at the time of this incident has 
been updated and re-issued in June 2023.  This guideline was created in consultation with the 
Doctors working within the Emergency Department and the Patient Safety team, to ensure the 
appropriate  learning  is incorporated into the process. The  guideline aligns with the  BMJ Best 
Practice recommendations. 

The  updated  guideline  has  introduced  a  flowchart  of  the  pathway  which  was  not  previously 
included in the policy, at the time of this case.  The need for early CT scanning is also emphasised 
throughout  the  guideline.  There  is  also  a  process  whereby  all  Junior  Doctors  discuss  their 
concerns for patients with an acute abdomen presentation and potential surgical referral with 
their Consultant prior to referral, to discuss the patient needs and check the referral has been 
made correctly. 

In order to embed the new guideline, it has been sent to all applicable staff, published on our 
intranet  site  and  discussed  within  team  meetings  and  appropriate  forums.  The  guidance  is 
highlighted at induction sessions for new doctors and in appropriate teaching  sessions.  Staff 
have also been reminded to include outstanding referrals at the handover discussion. Mr Gulzar’s 
case has also been anonymised and discussed with the clinical teams within the Emergency and 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Surgical departments to ensure our teams are aware of the learning from this case.  To assess 
the efficacy of the activities described above, an audit of the Acute Abdomen pathway is planned 
in March 2024. 

In relation to the concerns regarding the recognition of deterioration not being recognised due 
to Mr Gulzar’s mental health condition and the concerns of his family/carers being ignored; there 
is considerable work being done by our Patient Experience team to support improvement in this 
area.  Listening to and valuing the expertise that exists within carers and families is crucial to 
providing  personalised  care  and  treatment,  and  personalisation  is  a  key-cornerstone  of  the 
Trust's Fundamentals of Care programme.  Through this work a 'Carers Passport' with supporting 
patient  documentation  concentrating  on  the  person,  is  being  trialled  in  selected  wards  to 
understand the benefits this will reap for carers across the organisation.  This trial will take place 
in April 2024, and we will then look to roll this out across the Trust. 

The supporting documentation prompts carers to describe their loved one’s individual needs and 
how they may express things like pain, for example. 

Carers have told us that they want recognition for what they bring to the care team and this 
project will formalise the carers' relationship with the care team as a partner in care with us. 

Additionally, we have identified training and education in patient experience and communication 
as Trust priorities. Every session delivered in the last year stresses the value of carer involvement, 
their specific expertise and knowledge and the benefits in experience and outcomes that these 
bring. 

The Patient Safety Incident Response Framework (PSIRF) will be commencing 1st April 2024, and 
one  of  the  four  main  themes  for  learning  and  quality  improvement  for  the  Trust  has  been 
identified  as  ‘Vulnerable  People’,  with  the  first  year  focussing  on  Mental  Capacity  and  the 
management of patients who may lack capacity.  This will work alongside the Fundamentals of 
Care programme which has communication as a top priority, and the two workstreams will work 
together to support our vulnerable patients. 

I trust this information will provide you with reassurance regarding the concerns raised in your 
report, however if I can assist with anything further please let me know. 

Yours sincerely 

Chief Executive 

Page 2 of 2

Related reports

Other reports by Michael Pemberton

See all →

More reports categorised “Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths”

See all →

Track Sandwell and West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust

See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Sandwell and West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust, and how often a new one appears.

What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text

Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.

These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.