Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2026

Samuel Dickinson

Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2026-0082, written 10 Feb 2026. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.

Date of report10 Feb 2026
Reference2026-0082
DeceasedSamuel Dickinson
CoronerMichael Pemberton
Coroner areaManchester (West)
CategoryOther related deaths
Sourcejudiciary.uk record · original PDF
Responses published2

The report

Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.

Regulation 28: REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS 

NOTE:  This form is to be used after an inquest. 

REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT DEATHS 

THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO:  

1  THE SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE HOME DEPARTMENT 
2  THE SECRETARY OF STATE FOR HEALTH 

1  CORONER 

I am Michael James Pemberton, HM Area Coroner for the coroner area of Manchester (West). 

2  CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS 

I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and 
regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. 

3 

INVESTIGATION and INQUEST 

On 16 September 2025 I commenced an investigation into the death of Samuel John 
DICKINSON aged 39.  The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 10 February 
2026.   

The conclusion of the inquest was Suicide, and the medical cause of death was 1a Severe 
head injury 

4  CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH 

On 15 September 2025 the deceased who was a farmer and held both a firearms and 
shotgun licence, was found with a shotgun wound to the head in a shed at the farm where he 
resided with his family. He had left the house earlier that morning and his family called police 
concerned, when they found that a shotgun was missing from the gun cabinet where it was 
stored. A member of the family discovered the deceased in an outbuilding on the farm after a 
brief search. 

5  CORONER’S CONCERNS 

During the course of the investigation my inquiries revealed matters giving rise to concern. In 
my opinion there is a risk that future deaths could occur unless action is taken.  In the 
circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. 

The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows:  
(brief summary of matters of concern) 

1.  During the course of evidence it was reflected that Firearms Legislation relating to the 
holding of a shotgun or firearms licence (or both) contains no provision that a person 
holding a certificate must self report any illness or mental health condition which may 
give rise to a change in circumstances from the time when a grant of licence has 
been made, differing from obligations for example on a person holding a driving 
licence to do so. 

2.  Further it was stated that there is no obligation or provision requiring a General 

Practitioner practice to: 

a.  Clearly record the holding of a licence on medical records when advised of the 

grant, in order to assist with flagging any relevant issues that may need 

Regulation 28 – After Inquest 
Document Template Updated 30/07/2021 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 reporting (such as conditions listed on an initial firearms/shotgun application 
form or renewal) 

b.  Requiring the reporting of such issues on a reasonable basis to a firearms 

licence unit of a local police force 

3.  The above were described as ‘gaps’ in the legislation which may give rise to the risk 

of future death. 

6  ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN 

In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you (and/or your 
organisation) have the power to take such action. 

7  YOUR RESPONSE 

You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report,   
namely by 7 April 2026. I, the coroner, may extend the period. 

Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the 
timetable for action.  Otherwise, you must explain why no action is proposed. 

8  COPIES and PUBLICATION 

I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested Persons     

Greater Manchester Police 
Lancashire & Cumbria NHS Trust 

I have also sent it to         
Royal College of General Practitioners 
National Police Chiefs Council 
British Association for Shooting and Conservation 

who may find it useful or of interest. 

I am also under a duty to send a copy of your response to the Chief Coroner and all 
interested persons who in my opinion should receive it. 

I may also send a copy of your response to any person who I believe may find it useful or of 
interest. 

The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form.  
He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of 
interest.   

You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response about the 
release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner. 

9 

 Dated: 10 February 2026 

Michael J. Pemberton 
HM Area Coroner 
Manchester West 

Regulation 28 – After Inquest 
Document Template Updated 30/07/2021

Responses

2 responses published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.

Response from Department of Health and Social Care (PDF)
HM Coroner Michael J. Pemberton 
The Manchester West Coroner’s Office 
First Floor, Paderborn House 
Howell Croft North 
Bolton, BL1 1QY 

Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State 

39 Victoria Street  
London  
SW1H 0EU  

7 April 2026   

Dear Mr Pemberton, 

Thank you for the Regulation 28 report of 10 February 2026 sent to the Department of Health 
and Social Care about the death of Samuel John Dickinson. I am replying as the Minister 
with responsibility for data and technology.    

Firstly, I would like to say how saddened I was to read of the circumstances of Samuel’s 
death, and I offer my sincere condolences to their family and loved ones. The circumstances 
your report describes are deeply tragic and I am grateful to you for bringing these matters 
to my attention.  

The report raises concerns over firearms legislation relating to shotgun or firearms licensing 
(or  both)  and  provisions  on  certificate  holders  to  self-report  any  illness  or  mental  health 
condition  that  may  change  the  circumstances  from  the  time  at  which  the  license  was 
granted. My ministerial colleague in the Home Office will lead the response to this concern. 
The  report  also  raised  concerns  around  the  obligation  and  provision  for  a  General 
Practitioner to record the holding of a license within medical records to ensure any relevant 
issues are flagged, and provision for reporting of these issues, by GPs, to the local police 
force.  

The  Department  have  worked  closely  with  the  Home  Office  and  the  British  Medical 
Association to ensure there are strong controls in place in relation to an applicant’s medical 
suitability which is an important element of the application process that the police consider 
when deciding if an applicant can hold a firearms or shotgun certificate.  

An applicant is required to declare all relevant medical conditions upon applying and they 
must provide details of their GP, giving approval for their GP to share any concerns with the 
police for the application and throughout the period of firearms or shotgun licence, if granted. 
The proforma  is  then completed by  their  GP  or an  independent  General  Medical  Council 
registered doctor. The doctor completing the proforma checks the GP medical record and 
must provide details of all relevant medical conditions to the police. 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
   
 
 
 This process has been further strengthened within GP IT systems, where a GP can add a 
digital marker to the patient record, to note that the patient has a firearms certificate. This 
was fully rolled out to all GP IT systems in England by May 2023. If the patient begins to 
experience a relevant medical condition while the certificate is valid, upon discussion with 
the GP, the GP will see an alert and upon assessment, can ask the patient to contact the 
police or the GP can flag this to the police directly, with consent for this provided in the initial 
application.  This  allows  the  police  to  review  the  person’s  continued  suitability,  and  if 
necessary, revoke the certificate. Within the existing system there is also provision to record 
when contact has been made with the police as a result of a digital marker flag.  

A Memorandum of Understanding between the National Police Chiefs Council, the Home 
Office and the British Medical Association has been in place since 2019. In addition to Home 
Office 2021 Statutory Guidance for Chief Officers of Police which includes the role of GPs, 
the  British  Medical  Association  issues  its  own  guidance  to  GPs.  We  can  see  from  NHS 
England’s annual national data counts of clinical (SNOMED) coding that GPs are placing 
the markers and police contact is being made as a result. We understand the Home Office 
will continue to monitor usage as part of continuing to make the firearms licensing system 
as robust as it can be. 

I hope this response is helpful. Thank you for bringing these concerns to my attention.   

Yours sincerely,  

Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State 
for Health Innovation and Safety
Response from Home Office (PDF)
Minister of State for Policing and 
Crime  

2 Marsham Street 
London SW1P 4DF 
www.gov.uk/home-office 

Michael Pemberton 
HM Area Coroner 
HM Coroner’s Court and Office for Manchester (West) 
Paderborn House 
Howell Croft North 
North Bolton 
BL1 1QY 

March 2026 

INQUEST FOLLOWING THE DEATH OF SAMUEL JOHN DICKINSON 

REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS UNDER REGULATIONS 28 AND 29 OF THE 
CORONERS (INVESTIGATIONS) REGULATIONS 2013 

I am writing to thank you for your Regulation 28 report of 10 February following the inquest 
into the death of Samuel John Dickinson.  I would like to pass on my condolences to 
Samuel’s family and friends about this tragic loss of life. 

In your report you highlighted two specific concerns relating to perceived gaps in firearms 
legislation and controls.  The first relates to the absence of a specific requirement for a 
firearms or shotgun licence holder to report the onset of any illness or mental health 
condition which amounts to a change in circumstances from when the licence was issued.   

We recognise this as a potential area for strengthening.  We are therefore shortly bringing 
forward a new Statutory Instrument to add a new condition to firearms and shotgun 
licences to require the holder to inform the police if they begin to suffer from a new 
relevant medical condition, or if an existing condition significantly worsens, during the 
lifetime of the licence.  This will enable the police to assess whether the change affects the 
person’s suitability to continue to possess the firearm or shotgun.  At the same time, we 
will also be introducing a new licensing condition to require the licence holder to inform the 
police if they consult a third-party medical practitioner who is not their GP, to ensure that 
the police have a full picture of the licence holder’s health.   

Your second concern is that there is no obligation on GPs to record the holding of a 
firearms or shotgun licence on the holder’s medical records when advised that such a 
licence has been granted, or on them to report any relevant medical issues to the police.   

It is, mandatory for all firearm and shotgun licence applicants to provide information from 
their doctor about whether they have experienced any relevant medical conditions, 
including mental health conditions and drug and alcohol abuse, at the time of 
application.  This requirement was introduced in the Statutory Guidance to Chief Officers 
of Police on firearms licensing, which was first issued by the Home Office in November 
2021.  GPs are also asked to put a firearms marker on the GP patient record when the 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 person is granted a firearm or shotgun certificate, and this remains on the system for the 
five years’ duration of the licence.  If a certificate holder sees their GP regarding a relevant 
medical condition during this period, the doctor can advise the police of this, enabling the 
police to carry out a review as to whether the person remains suitable to have a licence.    

A new digital version of the firearms marker was introduced to all GP surgeries in England 
in May 2023.  The digital firearms marker automatically alerts the doctor if a patient is seen 
regarding a relevant medical condition and reminds the GP to advise the police. This 
improves the safety of the system and helps to ensure that the firearms marker is not 
missed by GPs.  The data we have on the use of the digital marker shows that it is now 
being applied by GPs. In 2024-25, over 98,000 digital markers were applied by GPs to the 
medical record of those granted or renewed a firearm or shotgun certificate and there were 
over 1,100 cases in which the GP notified the police of a medical concern about a licence 
holder, following a review prompted by the digital firearms marker.  We are however 
actively reviewing whether and how the digital firearms marker should be mandated in the 
future so that we can ensure that we build on the very encouraging use of the digital 
marker so far by GPs. 

We are also intending to consult on strengthening shotgun controls in due course.  The 
Government response to the 2023 consultation on firearms licensing, published in 
February 2025, included a commitment to consult on improving and aligning the controls 
on shotguns with other firearms.   

Thank you again for your report.   

Very best wishes, 

Minister of State for Policing and Crime

Related reports

Other reports by Michael Pemberton

See all →

More reports categorised “Other related deaths”

See all →

Track Michael Pemberton

See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Michael Pemberton, and how often a new one appears.

What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text

Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.

These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.