Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2024

Chamali Bibi

Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2024-0540, written 9 Oct 2024. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.

Date of report9 Oct 2024
Reference2024-0540
DeceasedChamali Bibi
CoronerMary Hassell
Coroner areaInner North London
CategoryHospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths
Organisation namedBarts Health NHS Trust
Sourcejudiciary.uk record · original PDF
Responses published1

The report

Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.

Regulation 28:  Prevention of Future Deaths report 

Chamali BIBI (died 04.03.23) 

THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: 

1. 

National Medical Director 
NHS England 
Wellington House 
133-135 Waterloo Road 
London SE1 8UG 

1 

CORONER 

I am:   Coroner ME Hassell 
           Senior Coroner  
           Inner North London 
           St Pancras Coroner’s Court 
           Camley Street 
           London  N1C 4PP 

2 

CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS 

I make this report under the Coroners and Justice Act 2009,  
paragraph 7, Schedule 5, and  
The Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013, 
regulations 28 and 29. 

3 

INVESTIGATION and INQUEST 

On  7  March  2023  I  commenced  an  investigation  into  the  death  of 
Chamali Bibi, aged 39 years.  

The inquest was listed for 15 August 2023, but the investigation was not 
concluded until the end of the inquest on 25 September 2024.   

I made a narrative determination at inquest, which I now attach. 

4 

CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH 

Ms Bibi underwent a right periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) on 01.03.23, 
during which she suffered haemorrhagic shock that led to a stroke that 
evening. 

1 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 5 

CORONER’S CONCERNS 

During the course of the inquest, the evidence revealed matters giving 
rise to concern. In my opinion, there is a risk that future deaths will occur 
unless  action  is  taken.  In  the  circumstances,  it  is  my  statutory  duty  to 
report to you. 

The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows.  

As  you  will  see  from  the  narrative  determination  attached,  there  were 
several  matters  requiring  attention  at  the  Royal  London  Hospital.  
However, I do not intend to make a  prevention of future deaths (PFD) 
report  to  Barts Health,  because  I  was  given undertakings  in  court that 
these matters have already been addressed. 

The  issue  that  I  bring  to  your  attention  is  this.    At  inquest,  I  heard 
evidence that PAOs should only be conducted by surgeons expert in this 
procedure.  I heard that only those undertaking this procedure frequently, 
with  mentor  feedback  on  the  surgery  taking  into  account  the  post 
operative imaging, can gain the necessary experience to become expert.   

However, the majority of the surgeons on the specialist register are the 
only  practitioners  within  their  trust  performing  the  surgery  and  the 
majority undertake fewer than ten per annum each.  Further, the register 
is voluntary.  Outliers do not appear to have been flagged. 

It is not clear to me whether all trusts recognise that the PAO is a different 
procedure, rather than simply being a different technique. 

6 

ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN 

In  my  opinion,  action  should  be  taken  to  prevent  future  deaths  and  I 
believe that you have the power to take such action.  

7 

YOUR RESPONSE 

You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date 
of this report, namely by 2 December 2024.  I, the coroner, may extend 
the period. 

Your  response  must  contain  details  of  action  taken  or proposed  to  be 
taken, setting out the timetable for action. Otherwise, you must explain 
why no action is proposed. 

8 

COPIES and PUBLICATION 

2 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 I have sent a copy of my report to the following. 

• 
• 
•  HHJ Alexia Durran, the Chief Coroner of England & Wales 

, Chief Medical Officer for England 

, husband of Chamali Bibi 

I  am  also  under  a  duty  to  send  a  copy  of  your  response  to  the  Chief 
Coroner and all interested persons who in my opinion should receive it.  
I  may  also  send  a  copy  of  your  response  to  any  other  person  who  I 
believe may find it useful or of interest.  

The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted 
or summary form. She may send a copy of this report to any person who 
she  believes  may  find  it  useful  or  of  interest.  You  may  make 
representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response, about 
the release or the publication of your response. 

9 

DATE                                                  SIGNED BY SENIOR CORONER 

09.10.24                                               ME Hassell 

3

Responses

1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.

Response from NHS England (PDF)
Coroner ME Hassell 
Senior Coroner 
Inner North London 
St Pancras Coroner’s Court 
Camley Street 
London  
N1C 4PP  

National Director of Patient Safety  
NHS England  
Wellington House 
133-155 Waterloo Road  
London 
SE1 8UG 

25 November 2024  

Dear Coroner, 

Re: Regulation 28 Report to Prevent Future Deaths – Chamali Bibi who died on 
4 March 2023.   

Thank  you  for  your  Report  to  Prevent  Future  Deaths  (hereafter  “Report”)  dated  9 
October 2024 concerning the death of Chamali Bibi on 4 March 2023. In advance of 
responding to the specific concerns raised in your Report, I would like to express my 
deep  condolences  to  Chamali’s  family  and  loved  ones.  NHS  England  are  keen  to 
assure the family and the Coroner that the concerns raised about Chamali’s care have 
been listened to and reflected upon.   

Your Report raises the concern that periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) procedures may 
not be being carried out by suitably experienced practitioners and that Trusts may not 
recognise it as being a specialist procedure, as opposed to a surgical technique. My 
response to the Coroner has been informed by specialist orthopaedic clinical opinion.  

The Coroner is correct in their assertion that PAOs are a specialist procedure  which 
should  be  undertaken  only  by  clinicians  with  the  requisite  training  and  experience,  
who  perform  the  procedure  regularly.  Clinicians  should  keep  a  record  of  their 
procedures and their outcomes, and it should form part of their annual appraisal and 
reaccreditation processes. Surgeons who have not undertaken the required training 
and fellowships should not perform PAO procedures. It is NHS England’s opinion that 
Orthopaedic Surgeons will already be aware that a PAO is a specialist procedure, and 
that Trusts should therefore be aware of this too.  

It  is  not  appropriate  for  NHS  England  to  provide  further  comment  on  the  concerns 
raised  in  your  Report,  based  on  the  information  provided.  I  understand  from  your 
Report  that  you  are  satisfied  that  Barts  Health  NHS  Trust  have  addressed  several 
matters which you felt required further attention, and undertakings were given to you 
in court in this respect. Your Report has also been sent to my regional colleagues in 
London as part of our internal Regulation 28 assurance processes. It is not therefore 
appropriate for NHS England to provide further comment on these specific concerns.  

NHS  England  are  not  the  responsible  organisation  for  the  relevant  clinical  and 
professional standards and guidance raised in this matter. The Coroner may wish to 
refer to the Royal College of Surgeons (RCS) of England or the British Orthopaedic 
Association (BOA) if they feel they require further information.     

                                                                                                                       
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
  
 I  would  also  like  to  provide  further  assurances  on  the  national  NHS  England  work 
taking  place around  the  Reports  to  Prevent Future  Deaths.  All  reports received  are 
discussed  by  the  Regulation  28  Working  Group,  comprising  Regional  Medical 
Directors,  and  other  clinical  and  quality  colleagues  from  across  the  regions.  This 
ensures  that  key  learnings  and  insights  around  events,  such  as  the  sad  death  of 
Chamali are shared across the NHS at both a national and regional level and helps us 
to  pay  close  attention  to  any  emerging  trends  that  may  require  further  review  and 
action.   

Thank you for bringing these important patient safety issues to my attention and please 
do not hesitate to contact me should you need any further information.  

Yours sincerely,  

National Director of Patient Safety

Related reports

Other reports by Mary Hassell

See all →

More reports categorised “Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths”

See all →

Track Barts Health NHS Trust

See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Barts Health NHS Trust, and how often a new one appears.

What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text

Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.

These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.