Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2025
Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2025-0146, written 17 Mar 2025. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.
| Date of report | 17 Mar 2025 |
|---|---|
| Reference | 2025-0146 |
| Deceased | Billie Wicks |
| Coroner | Mary Hassell |
| Coroner area | Inner North London |
| Category | Child Death (from 2015) · Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths · Alcohol, drug and medication related deaths |
| Source | judiciary.uk record · original PDF |
| Responses published | 3 |
Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.
Regulation 28: Prevention of Future Deaths report
Billie Diane WICKS (died 15.09.24)
THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO:
1. Medical Director
Royal Free Hospital
Pond Street
London NW3 2QG
2. President
Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health
5-11 Theobalds Road
London WC1X 8SH
3. President
Royal College of Emergency Medicine
Octavia House
54 Ayres Street
London SE1 1EU
1
CORONER
I am: Coroner ME Hassell
Senior Coroner
Inner North London
St Pancras Coroner’s Court
Camley Street
London N1C 4PP
2
CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS
I make this report under the Coroners and Justice Act 2009,
paragraph 7, Schedule 5, and
The Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013,
regulations 28 and 29.
3
INVESTIGATION and INQUEST
On 17 September 2024 one of my assistant coroners, Edwin Buckett,
commenced an investigation into the death of Billie Wicks aged 16 years.
The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 6 March 2025.
I made a narrative determination having found that Billie died from
infective exacerbation of asthma.
1
4
CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH
Billie had been brought to the Royal Free Hospital just before midnight
the night before her death with an asthma attack.
A first presentation of asthma at the age of 16 years without any family
history is unusual, and it was a busy night in the accident and emergency
department. Billie was inappropriately discharged at approximately
3.30am without adequate repeat observations or senior clinical review,
and so her asthma was not diagnosed or treated.
If it had been, she probably would have survived.
5
CORONER’S CONCERNS
During the course of the inquest, the evidence revealed matters giving
rise to concern. In my opinion, there is a risk that future deaths will occur
unless action is taken. In the circumstances, it is my statutory duty to
report to you.
A PSII (patient safety incident investigation) was conducted and learning
identified, but some areas of concern do remain.
The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows.
1. At inquest, I heard repeatedly that on the night Billie attended, the
Royal Free emergency department was understaffed, and that it
remains understaffed of doctors, nurses, and even a healthcare
assistant who could take basic observations.
Billie should have had observations every hour. If she had had
these observations, the emergency registrar who discharged her
would have recognised that she was not as well as he thought,
and would have sought senior medical review. That senior
the course of her
medical review would have changed
management and saved her life.
Following the inquest touching the death of Daniel Klosi, I wrote
to you on 16 August 2024 about a lack of observations in the
emergency department of the Royal Free. Although the
circumstances were different, there is a theme.
2. The registrar who saw Billie the night before her death prescribed
an antibiotic, but he was not in the habit of giving the first dose in
the department and he did not on this occasion. This meant that
Billie’s infection was not tackled as quickly as it could have been.
This seems to indicate a training and potentially a guideline need.
2
3. At the time of Billie’s presentation, the registrar was unaware of
the possibility of adult onset asthma. This seems to indicate a
training and potentially a guideline need.
4. I heard that Billie was safety netted when she was discharged.
Her parents were told to bring her back if they had any concerns.
I have heard this safety netting advice being described many,
many times in different inquests. What worries me about it in this
context is that Billie’s parents had brought her to hospital because
they were concerned. They were then reassured by hospital staff.
It is therefore difficult to see how this particular advice could be a
meaningful instruction.
In reality, her parents’ initial concern was well placed and they had
responded to it appropriately by bringing Billie to hospital. When
Billie began to deteriorate again, her parents’ natural instinct had
been blunted by their first visit to the hospital.
5. Whilst I doubt that it would have made a difference in this case, I
understand that blood pressure is not yet an observation included
in the national paediatric early warning score (PEWS).
6
ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN
In my opinion, action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I
believe that you have the power to take such action.
7
YOUR RESPONSE
You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date
of this report, namely by 12 May 2025. I, the coroner, may extend the
period.
Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be
taken, setting out the timetable for action. Otherwise, you must explain
why no action is proposed.
8
COPIES and PUBLICATION
I have sent a copy of my report to the following.
• Billie’s parents
• HHJ Alexia Durran, the Chief Coroner of England & Wales
3
I am also under a duty to send a copy of your response to the Chief
Coroner and all interested persons who in my opinion should receive it.
I may also send a copy of your response to any other person who I
believe may find it useful or of interest.
The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted
or summary form. She may send a copy of this report to any person who
she believes may find it useful or of interest. You may make
representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response, about
the release or the publication of your response.
9
DATE SIGNED BY SENIOR CORONER
13.03.25 ME Hassell
4
3 responses published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.
Coroner ME Hassell Senior Coroner Inner North London St Pancras Coroner’s Court Camley Street London N1C 4PP 02 May 2025 Dear M. E Hassell. Firstly, may we pass on my condolences to the family and friends of Billie Wicks. We appreciate the opportunity to comment on the issues raised by HM Coroner. Staffing We are unable to comment about the staffing model, numbers, or skill mix, at The Royal Free Hospital’s emergency department. The Royal College of Emergency Medicine (RCEM) has guidance regarding the level of staffing for doctors [1], nurses, and healthcare staff [2]. In December 2024, the RCEM also published standards around staffing [3]. Each ED should have a senior decision-making (tier 4) doctor in the department at all times [3, 7]. A tier 4 doctor may be referred to as a registrar. Adequate staffing is required to deliver safe care. Physiological Observations Each emergency department (ED) should have a track and trigger tool for children (of all ages) [3] and adults. There are several different scores that are referred to as PEWS. The national paediatric early warning system (nPEWS) was designed for inpatient use, and a new ED version is currently being developed and tested. NEWS2 and nPEWS both include blood pressure monitoring. RCEM and the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Heath, do not currently support the use of nPEWS in the ED [5,6]. It is acceptable to use the adult national early warning score (NEWS2) in children aged 16 and above [4]. Both nPEWS and NEWS2 have suggested frequency of repeat observations depending on the initial set of observations performed. Listening to parents & carers The nPEWS and the EDnPEWS that is being developed both contain a section to record parental/carer concern and this is included in the escalation advice. RCEM is supportive of the testing of Martha’s Rule in the ED setting. Antibiotic administration It is good practice for the prescribing and administration of medicines to be performed by different practitioners [8]. There is current guidance on the management of sepsis. This would suggest that for sepsis without shock, antibiotics should be administered within three hours [9]. It is unclear whether Billie had sepsis. Guidance for the time to administer the first dose of antibiotics in people with infection without sepsis are less proscriptive. RCEM notes that Billie was discharged after about three and a half hours. It is assumed that she was given antibiotics at discharge, to self-administer. Antibiotics are only part of the management for an exacerbation of asthma thought to be secondary to a bacterial infection. Exacerbations of asthma in childhood are often secondary to viral infection; if this was the case, the timing of the first dose of antibiotics is irrelevant. It is unclear if Billie was given any steroids or received any other acute management for asthma. RCEM are not aware of any national guidance or clear rationale which would support a directive that, in the absence of suspected allergy, the first dose of an antibiotic needs to be administered by a clinician. Recognition of Adult-onset Asthma Billie was 16 years old, whilst legally a child, for the purposes of assessment and treatment of asthma it may have been appropriate to have managed her as an adult [10]. There are national guidelines around the management of acute exacerbations of asthma, as well as the diagnosis of asthma [11,12]. RCEM has learning resources regarding asthma diagnosis and treatment. This highlights that one in four patients are not diagnosed with asthma until an adult [13,14], and asthma is part of the curriculum for post-graduate doctors in training [15]. Safety Netting ED clinicians will often see patients and discharge them home knowing that there is a possibility (however small) that their condition might deteriorate. RCEM shares your concerns regarding the use of the term ‘safety netting’ in medical notes. This term is only of value if the components of the ‘safety net’ have been documented. RCEM considers the components which relate to safety netting (as opposed to other information which might be provided to the patient) to include: [18] • What symptoms to look out for which suggest condition is not getting better • What symptoms should necessitate review in the community (GP) • What symptoms should necessitate review back in the emergency department or the need to telephone 999 • What, if any, follow-up is required This is in keeping with the information contained in many patient information leaflets produced by the NHS [16] relating to conditions which may present to an emergency department and be suitable for discharge, including asthma [17]. The provision of standard written advice or access to online material via a QR code is ideal [18]. RCEM will update its existing guidance on the provision of information to patients to specifically address the issue of ‘safety netting’, we are grateful to you for bringing this issue to our attention. Yours sincerely, Chair, Quality in Emergency Care Committee Royal College of Emergency Medicine References 1. Royal College of Emergency Medicine. (2019). RCEM Workforce Recommendations 2018: Consultant Staffing in Emergency Departments in the UK (Revised February 2019). Retrieved from https://rcem.ac.uk/wp- content/uploads/2021/11/RCEM_Consultant_Workforce_Document_Feb_2019.pdf 2. Royal College of Nursing & Royal College of Emergency Medicine. (2020). Nursing Workforce Standards for Type 1 Emergency Departments. Retrieved from https://res.cloudinary.com/studio- republic/images/v1635683394/RCN_RCEM_Nursing_Workforce_Standards_2020/RCN_RCEM_Nurs ing_Workforce_Standards_2020.pdf 3. Royal College of Emergency Medicine. (2024). Guidelines for the Provision of Emergency Medicine Services (GPEMS). Retrieved from https://rcem.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/GPEMS-Jan- 2025.pdf 4. Royal College of Physicians. (2017). National Early Warning Score (NEWS) 2: Standardising the assessment of acute-illness severity in the NHS – Executive Summary and Recommendations. London: RCP. Retrieved from https://www.rcp.ac.uk/media/ctulqqbn/news2-executive-summary_0.pdf 5. Royal College of Emergency Medicine. (2024). RCEM Position Statement: Paediatric Early Warning Scores. Retrieved from https://rcem.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/RCEM-Position- Statement-Paediatric-Early-Warning-Scores-Jan-2024-FINAL.pdf 6. Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health. (2024). UK Paediatric Early Warning Systems (PEWS). Retrieved from https://www.rcpch.ac.uk/resources/UK-paediatric-early-warning-systems#_0- should-we-be-using-the-national-pews-in-emergency-departments 7. Royal College of Emergency Medicine. (2025). Revised Position Statement on RCEM Workforce Tiers. Retrieved from https://rcem.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/Tiers2-February-2025.pdf 8. Royal Pharmaceutical Society. (2024). Prescribing and Dispensing by the Same Healthcare Professional: Position Statement. Retrieved from https://www.rpharms.com/recognition/all-our- campaigns/policy-a-z/prescribing-and-dispensing 9. Academy of Medical Royal Colleges. (2022). Statement on the Initial Antimicrobial Treatment of Sepsis (Version 2, October 2022). Retrieved from https://www.aomrc.org.uk/wp- content/uploads/2022/10/Statement_on_the_initial_antimicrobial_treatment_of_sepsis_V2_1022.pdf 10. Resuscitation Council UK. (2022). Paediatric Emergency Algorithms & Resources (Version 1, March 2022). Retrieved from https://www.resus.org.uk/sites/default/files/2022- 03/RCUK%20Paediatric%20emergency%20algorithms%20and%20resources%20Mar%2022%20V1. pdf 11. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). (2024). Asthma: Acute Exacerbation Management. Clinical Knowledge Summary. Retrieved from https://cks.nice.org.uk/topics/asthma/management/acute-exacerbation-of-asthma/ 12. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). (2024). Asthma: Assessment. Clinical Knowledge Summary. Retrieved from https://cks.nice.org.uk/topics/asthma/diagnosis/assessment/ 13. Royal College of Emergency Medicine. (2021). Asthma in Adults. RCEMLearning. Retrieved from https://www.rcemlearning.co.uk/reference/asthma-in-adults/ 14. Context - RCEMLearning 15. Royal College of Emergency Medicine. (2019). The Syllabus. Retrieved from https://rcemcurriculum.co.uk/the-syllabus/ 16. National Health Service (NHS). (n.d.). Health A to Z. Retrieved April 14, 2025, from https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/ 17. National Health Service (NHS). (2024). Asthma. Retrieved April 14, 2025, from https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/asthma/ 18. Royal College of Emergency Medicine. (2023). Best Practice Guideline: Providing Patient Information in the Emergency Department. Retrieved from http://rcem.ac.uk/wp- content/uploads/2023/10/RCEM_Best_Practice_Providing_Information_in_the_Emergency_Departme nt.pdf
Coroner ME Hassell Senior Coroner Inner North London St Pancras Coroner’s Court Camley Street London N1C 4PP 12 May 2025 Sent by email to: Dear Mr. Hassell, Re: RCPCH Response to the Inquest Touching the Death of Billie Diane Wicks A Regulation 28 Report – Action to Prevent Future Deaths Thank you for sharing your report with us regarding the tragic and untimely passing of Billie Diane Wicks. I was very sorry to hear of Billie’s death. I have shared your report with colleagues within RCPCH. We have considered your report carefully. Of the five matters noted, we believe two are of particular note to the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health given our work on standards of paediatric care in the Emergency Department and our work to implement the Paediatric Early Warning Systems (PEWS) process across the four nations. 1. I heard repeatedly that on the night Billie attended, the Royal Free emergency department was understaffed, and that it remains understaffed of doctors, nurses, and even a healthcare assistant who could take basic observations. Billie should have had observations every hour. From the information provided we do not know many observations (if any) Billie had during her five hour stay in ED. Observations are important but are part of a holistic assessment of children. There are lots of reasons why observations might not be obtainable, however RCPCH recognises that challenges are significantly exacerbated by gaps in clinical rotas resulting in understaffed departments. In 2024, RCPCH carried out work to better understand where rota gaps most prominently impact paediatrics, and we continue to advocate at a local and national level for an active reduction in these gaps1. Our Facing the Future standards aim to provide a vision of how paediatric care can be delivered to provide a safe and sustainable, high-quality service that meets the health needs of every child and young person. There are standards covering emergency settings. It is not clear from the report whether Billie was treated in an adult or paediatric emergency department, however RCPCH is clear that our Facing the Future: Emergency Care 1 RCPCH Rota Gaps Survey Report. 2024. Available from: https://www.rcpch.ac.uk/resources/rota-gaps-2024 Standards apply to all persons up until the age of 18, regardless of where they are treated. These standards aim to ensure that urgent and emergency care is fully integrated to ensure children are seen by the right people, at the right place and in the right setting. We are currently in the process of audit, review and revision and update of our current standards, to be published later in 2025. One of the current Emergency care standards has particular relevance: • Standard 17 – All children attending emergency care settings are visually assessed by a doctor or nurse immediately upon arrival with clinical assessment undertaken within 15 minutes to determine priority category, supplemented by a pain score and a full record of vital signs. As mentioned, these standards are currently being updated and the new version will set out that observations are part of holistic care and repetition is dependent on the child’s well- being, alongside clarification around frequency of observations. 2. I understand that blood pressure is not yet an observation included in the national paediatric early warning score (PEWS). I can confirm that blood pressure is now an observation included in the national paediatric early warning score (PEWS). The PEWS score consists of: Heart Rate, Respiratory Rate, Extent of Respiratory Distress, Blood Pressure, Oxygen Saturations, Oxygen Delivery and Capillary Refill Time (CRT). RCPCH have been collaborating with NHS England and the Royal College of Nursing to develop a single national PEWS for England since 2018 and are supportive of equivalent processes across the UK. Thank you for seeking our views and reminding us of the importance of this work. Our sincere condolences are with Billie’s family. Yours sincerely RCPCH President
Royal Free London Hospital Group, Pond Street, London NW3 2QG Phone: 020 7794 0500 Private and Confidential His Majesty’s Senior Coroner Mary Hassell St Pancras Coroner’s Court Camley Street London N1C 4PP Via Email 12 May 2025 Dear Madam, Re: Regulation 28: Prevention of Future Deaths report – Billie Wicks (date of death: 15 September 2024) We write to you in response to the Regulation 28: Prevention of Future Deaths report following the inquest into the death of Billie Wicks We would like to reiterate our sincere condolences to the family of Billie for their loss. The Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust has carefully considered the matters of concern raised in the Regulation 28 Report. We are grateful for the opportunity to respond to the matters you have raised and would like to start by assuring you that this safety event has been reviewed as part of our routine governance process, prior to the inquest. The Trust reviewed this safety event at the Patient Safety Event Review Panel (PSERP) on 25 September, where it was agreed that a Patient Safety Incident Investigation (PSII) would be undertaken. The PSII was completed and the findings shared with Billie’s family in advance of the inquest. The inquest took place on 6 March 2025 and raised several matters of concern which have been responded to below: 1. At inquest, I heard repeatedly that on the night Billie attended, the Royal Free emergency department was understaffed, and that it remains understaffed of doctors, nurses, and even a healthcare assistant who could take basic observations. Billie should have had observations every hour. If she had had these observations, the emergency registrar who discharged her would have recognised that she was not as well as he thought and would have sought senior medical review. That senior medical review would have changed the course of her management and saved her life. Following the inquest touching the death of Daniel Klosi, I wrote to you on 16 August 2024 about a lack of observations in the emergency department of the Royal Free. Although the circumstances were different, there is a theme. It is acknowledged that on the night Billie attended the Royal Free Hospital Emergency Department, there was a failure to recognise the significance of her abnormal observations, resulting in Billie being discharged inappropriately. The lack of repeat observations is also recognised as an ongoing theme which has been extensively addressed and a number of measures, already in place, have been detailed in this response. It is noted that patients in the emergency department are required to have hourly observations whilst they remain abnormal. In Billie’s case her observations remained abnormal, therefore a further set of observations would have prevented her discharge from the department. To further address these concerns, the following actions have been taken: • Emergency department paediatric consultant cover has been augmented since this incident and is now consistently scheduled every day between 09:00 - 23:00 hrs Monday to Friday, providing senior supervision during these hours to the middle grade doctors working in this area, maintaining robust training and guidance during these hours to enable improved decision making and increased confidence overnight. • Following this safety event, all paediatric patients with abnormal vital signs must be referred to Paediatrics prior to discharge, the guideline has been updated and shared to reflect this requirement. • Access to an onsite Paediatric consultant is available 24/7 and an emergency medicine consultant is available 24/7 through the on-call system if needed to support the above action. • All new doctors starting in the Emergency Department, now receive a mandatory teaching session at induction focusing on paediatrics and paediatric deterioration and escalation with regular sessions timetabled ongoing to maintain this education. • In addition to these measures, this case has been shared on multiple occasions during Paediatric and ED Mortality and Morbidity (M&M) meetings, hospital wide safety briefings across all divisions as shared learning. • Nurse staffing on the night of Billie’s first attendance on 14th September 2024 was in line with the nursing establishment levels of safe staffing except for one Registered Nurse (RN) rota gap during the day shift prior to Billie’s attendance. In the interim the trust has approved additional staffing to medical and nursing shifts, filled by bank and agency staff to mitigate staffing to the levels described in the business case based on safe staffing skill mix assessment and the level of acuity / complexity of patients attending in the Royal Free Hospital emergency department. • Long-term mitigation of the current establishment is anticipated and is associated with the trusts process of business case approval. However, in the interim we are achieving the augmented staffing levels with bank and agency shift cover until we have the reconfigured and augmented establishment approved. This will increase the number of senior staff on shift as well as supplement the paediatric team with an Emergency Department Assistant (EDA) 24/7. This is a non-registered clinical member of staff who can take on duties similar to a Health Care Assistant/Support Worker including performing and recording observations on paediatric patients. 2. The registrar who saw Billie the night before her death prescribed an antibiotic, but he was not in the habit of giving the first dose in the department and he did not on this occasion. This meant that Billie’s infection was not tackled as quickly as it could have been. This seems to indicate a training and potentially a guideline need. The addition of an ED pharmacist would support reliable stocking of medications, provide access to critical medications out of hours, education throughout the department and provide continuous and vital expertise. The lack of pharmacy resource within the Emergency Department is noted to be an area of concern. It is recognised and is continually monitored, risk mitigations have been identified, and actions are currently being driven to try to resolve this in the form of a business case. The business case is currently progressing through an approval process with a comprehensive action plan in place whilst this gap remains. Whilst this work is being undertaken steps have been put in place to reinforce that when indicated medications should be started in the department and given as ‘To Take Away’ (TTA) medications. This education has already commenced in the doctor’s induction programme and will continue going forwards. This pharmacy resource has also been explored in greater detail in the Patient Safety Incident Investigation (PSII) and appropriate actions have been added to monitor progress of the business case previously referred to. An additional action to ensure there is sufficient supply of medication in the adult TTA stock cupboard in the Emergency Department and to include medication stock responsibilities in job planning has been agreed to further support the ED team in this area, this is being led by the Divisional Clinical Director for this area. After a thorough review by the multidisciplinary team (MDT) panel, it was determined that antibiotics were unlikely to have altered the outcome, as the infection was likely to be viral in nature. The panel agreed that while initiating antibiotics at an earlier stage was unlikely to have altered the outcome for Billie, it may well alter the course of other patients in similar circumstances. 3. At the time of Billie’s presentation, the registrar was unaware of the possibility of adult-onset asthma. This seems to indicate a training and potentially a guideline need. It is acknowledged in Billie’s case, the registrar reviewing Billie did not consider a diagnosis of adult-onset asthma. Paediatric Asthma Wheeze Guidelines and a case study of the incident has been used to exemplify learning from this incident. The learning and reflections have been delivered at the ED Mortality and Morbidity meeting, paediatric teaching sessions to middle grades and junior doctors, and is included within the Junior Doctors induction plan. The intended effect is to enhance awareness of the guideline and drive the knowledge and application of treatments for asthma. Improving awareness of the Paediatric Wheeze pathway has already commenced including the implementation of standardised assessments for patients presenting with asthma or wheeze. 4. I heard that Billie was safety netted when she was discharged. Her parents were told to bring her back if they had any concerns. I have heard this safety netting advice being described many, many times in different inquests. What worries me about it in this context is that Billie’s parents had brought her to hospital because they were concerned. They were then reassured by hospital staff. It is therefore difficult to see how this particular advice could be a meaningful instruction. In reality, her parents’ initial concern was well placed, and they had responded to it appropriately by bringing Billie to hospital. When Billie began to deteriorate again, her parents’ natural instinct had been blunted by their first visit to the hospital. It is acknowledged that all parents attending the paediatric Emergency Department are concerned for their children and the team rely on good history and information gathering along with thorough assessments to identify the most appropriate course of action to be taken. In this case, the primary concern was that Billie was discharged on her first attendance without ensuring her vital signs were within normal parameters. More specific safety netting advice should have been given around the increase in difficulty breathing, failure to respond to treatment provided either by RFH or the GP and had Billie been discharged with more specific advice, she may have re-presented earlier. To note, safety netting is a well-recognised tool and ensures patients do return if a patient deteriorates and are reviewed by a senior ED clinician. This is successfully employed in many cases and there are Royal College of Emergency Medicine (RCEM) guidelines that describe the process if a patient returns to an emergency department. At the Royal Free the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health (RCPCH) AND Healthier Together QR codes are available for common presentations to support safety netting advice given. 5. Whilst I doubt that it would have made a difference in this case, I understand that blood pressure is not, yet an observation included in the national paediatric early warning score (PEWS) NHS England is rolling out a new national standardised approach of tracking the deterioration of children in hospital, which is scheduled for full completion, nationally by 30 September 2025. The Royal Free London (RFL) is currently working through the implementation of this into our Electronic Patient Record (EPR) system and aims will be in line with this guidance. It is expected to be implemented at the Royal Free Hospital (RFH) by the national deadline. Previously there has not been published national guidance on vital signs. National PEWS is a new national guideline and will include blood pressures. Whilst in Billie’s case the blood pressure was not taken, it was likely to have been normal and would not have changed the outcome in this case. In response to this case a cross-site working group has been established to unify the recognition and actions to be taken in a deteriorating child. This includes all Royal Free London (RFL) hospital sites and has multi-disciplinary membership. Meetings are held on a 2-weekly basis and the group oversees the progress of the implementation of the national PEWS, education, staffing, guidelines and risk evaluation. The action plan outlined in the Patient Safety Investigation (PSII) has been provided below. The Trust is committed to learning from Billie’s tragic death and continuously improving patient safety. We will actively monitor adherence to the ongoing improvement plans and the Trust’s action plan is set out below. This will be monitored by the Acute Medicine, Emergency Department and Elderly Care (AMEDEC) Divisional Quality & Safety Board and the Clinical Performance and Patient Safety Committee. Action Plan Safety action description Responsibility for monitoring/ oversight Action Deadline Evidence Relevant Recommendation - Staffing/ Education 1. For the senior matron for the Emergency Department to continue to review the business case for recruitment of a Clinical Practice Educator (CPE), Emergency Department Assistant (EDA) and overall nursing staffing in the Paediatric Emergency Department. Senior matron, Emergency Department 30/05/2025 Copy of the business plan 2. Senior matron for Emergency Department to review staffing skill mix for day and night shifts. Senior matron, Emergency Department 30/05/2025 Copy of the business plan 3. For the senior matron for the Emergency Department to organise future team days with a focus on PEWS, escalation of abnormal observations and observations on discharge Senior matron, Emergency Department 5. For the senior matron and ED consultants for the Emergency Department to ensure all staff carry out robust communication and timely documentation. Senior matron, Emergency Department 6. For the Senior Matron for the Emergency Department to discuss a plan for ensuring huddles take place overnight in the Emergency Department with Paediatric Emergency to ensure robust communication between the nursing and medical teams Senior matron, Emergency Department 30/05/2025 30/05/2025 30/05/2025 Copy of the training plan Copy of the training plan Copy of the training plan 7. To discuss the Paediatric Asthma Wheeze Guidelines during team days . Senior matron, Emergency Department 8. Education in the doctor’s induction program on TTA medications 9. All new doctors starting in the Emergency Department, there is now a teaching session during induction focusing on Paediatrics and regular sessions ongoing to maintain this education to include individualised specific safety netting depending on clinical symptoms. Relevant Recommendation – Pharmacy Provision 10 To ensure pharmacy provision in the Emergency Department through the implementation of plans for a dedicated ED Pharmacist. 11. To ensure sufficient supply of medication in the adult TTA stock cupboard in the Emergency Department and to include medication stock responsibilities in job planning. Relevant Recommendation – Pharmacy Digital Solutions 12. As part of the working group there will be discussions about how deteriorating young people (between aged 16–18-year-old) can be captured by using PEWS or NEWS Relevant Recommendation – Shared Learning 13. To formalise the process of shared learning of emergency department safety events between Royal Free, Barnet and North Middlesex Hospital sites through the regular meetings of the Emergency Department Governance Lead Emergency Department Governance Lead Divisional clinical director for acute medicine, emergency and elderly care Divisional clinical director for acute medicine, emergency and elderly care The PEWS Implementation Working Group Divisional clinical director for acute medicine, emergency and elderly care 30/05/2025 Completed/ Ongoing Completed Copy of the training plan Copy of the training plan Copy of the training plan 30/05/2025 Copy of the business case 30/05/2025 Copy of the training plan 30/05/2025 30/05/2025 Copy of the meeting minutes 14. Leadership of the ED services (senior matrons and governance leads). In addition to these measures, this case has been shared on multiple occasions during Paediatric and ED Mortality and Morbidity (M&M) meetings for ongoing and shared learning Relevant Recommendation – other 15. Following this safety event, all paediatric patients with persistent abnormal vital signs at the point of discharge, must be referred to Paediatrics prior to discharge, the guideline has been updated and shared to reflect this requirement 16. Paediatric consultants cover in place consistently from 09:00 to 23:00 (Monday to Friday) Divisional clinical director for acute medicine, emergency and elderly care Clinical Director for Childrens' Services Royal Free London (Barnet, Chase Farm & Royal Free North MIddlesex) Clinical Director for Childrens' Services Royal Free London (Barnet, Chase Farm & Royal Free) Completed Completed Completed/ Ongoing We will be sending a copy of this letter to North Central London Integrated Care Board. If you would like any further information about any part of this letter, please do not hesitate to contact us. Yours sincerely, Director of Nursing, Royal Free Hospital London Group NHS Trust Medical Director Royal Free Hospital Royal Free Royal Free London Group NHS Trust
See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Child Death (from 2015), and how often a new one appears.
What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text
Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.
These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.