Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2025
Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2025-0285, written 19 Mar 2025. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.
| Date of report | 19 Mar 2025 |
|---|---|
| Reference | 2025-0285 |
| Deceased | Benjamin Compton |
| Coroner | Philip Spinney |
| Coroner area | Devon, Plymouth and Torbay |
| Category | Road (Highways Safety) related deaths |
| Source | judiciary.uk record · original PDF |
| Responses published | 3 |
Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.
REGULATION 28: REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS THIS REPORT DATED 19 MARCH 2025 IS BEING SENT TO: Devon Integrated Care Board. Devon Partnership Trust. Director for Primary Care NHS Devon. NHS England. For information: Family of Benjamin Robert Compton. Chief Coroner. 1 CORONER I am Philip SPINNEY, HM Senior Coroner, for the coroner area of The County of Devon, Plymouth and Torbay. 2 CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. 3 INVESTIGATION and INQUEST On 10 February 2022 an investigation was commenced into the death of Benjamin Robert Compton. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest held on 4 -5 March and 10 March 2025. The conclusion of the inquest was as follows: On 1 February 2022 Benjamin Robert Compton died after being hit by a lorry on the M5, Devon, between junctions 29 and 28. Road Traffic Collision 4 CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH Benjamin was diagnosed with having an autism Spectrum disorder. In September 2021 Benjamin started to suffer a deterioration in his physical and mental wellbeing; according to the evidence this was probably due to an episode of swallowing water in a swimming pool; that event started a pathway of decline over several months. The evidence at the inquest supports the conclusion that the cause was multifactorial and there are a number of possible contributory factors to the deterioration in his health and the escalation in his disruptive behaviour, these included: 1 Aspects of his physical health His medications The removal from his GP Practice - - - - Placement on the Special Allocation Scheme - - The lack of an effective medication review and Changes in his routines Benjamin required multidisciplinary input into all aspects of his care planning; including primary care for prescribing medication for emotional wellbeing and pain, from psychology for safe interventions, specialist sensory occupational therapy for communication and interaction with the world. In January 2022 when Benjamin was in crisis, clinical support and advice was limited – he was not able to see a GP, he did not receive a full and effective medication review and in the early part of January 2022 he was not in receipt of a full and effective social care package. The inquest heard evidence about the Devon Adult Autism Intervention Team (commissioned by The Devon Integrated Care Board and operated by Devon Partnership Trust). This team forms part of the Devon Health and Social Care Systems response to the needs of autistic adults across Devon, although it was not fully operational when Benjamin died. The team offers signposting and advice, consultation for professionals and assessment, formulation and provision of direct interventions where needed. This is a clinical team consisting of Psychology, Speech & Language, Occupational Therapy and Psychiatry. However the team is only able to offer limited interventions and not in circumstances where the individual is in crisis. In the early hours of the 1 February 2022, at a time when he was distressed and overwhelmed by his emotions and difficulties tolerating change, Benjamin left his accommodation where he was being supported by carers and walked barefoot and in his night clothes to the M5 where he was hit by a lorry. 5 CORONER’S CONCERNS During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action is taken. In the circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows: (1) The evidence reveals that there was a gap in the provision of care for individuals suffering with autism and in crisis, that remains the case today both in Devon and nationally. Evidence was heard that a gap exists with autistic people in distress and or dysregulation with no treatable mental health condition and there is a grey area 2 around treatment. This is beyond the skills of social care providers. And unless the individual meets the criteria for treatment under the Mental Health Act there is very little support. (2) Benjamin was removed from his GP practice due to violent behaviour and allocated to the Special Allocation Scheme. This scheme was not able to meet the needs of a patient such as Benjamin with a diagnosis of Autism Spectrum disorder. 6 ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN (1) Consideration should be given to reviewing the process of supporting and providing interventions to those individuals suffering with autism and in crisis. (2) Consideration should be given to ensuring that when patients are allocated to the GP Special Allocation Scheme they are properly assessed as being suitable for the scheme and receive the appropriate clinical care and treatment. In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you and your organisation have the power to take such action. 7 YOUR RESPONSE You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, namely by 14 May 2025. I, the coroner, may extend the period. Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed. 8 COPIES and PUBLICATION I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner I am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response. The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form. She may send a copy of this report to any person who she believes may find it useful or of interest. You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response, about the release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner. 9 SIGNED: Mr Philip C Spinney 3 HM Senior Coroner 4
3 responses published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.
CONFIDENTIAL
Mr Philip Spinney
HM Senior Coroner
County Hall
Topsham Road
Exeter
EX24QD
Sent via e-mail
Dear Mr Spinney
Trust Headquarters
Wonford House
Dryden Road
Exeter
EX2 9AF
Tel: 01392 208683
Date: 07 May 2025.
Re. Mr Benjamin Robert Compton – Regulation 28 report.
I write in my capacity as Chief Nursing Officer and Allied Professions Lead at Devon Partnership
NHS Trust (the Trust) in response to your regulation 28 report dated 19 March 2025.
Can I first of all pass on my condolences to Mr Compton’s family and friends.
In your report you highlighted areas of concern to Devon Integrated Care Board, Director for
Primary Care NHS Devon, and NHS England along with us Devon Partnership NHS Trust (DPT).
In respect to the concerns pertinent to DPT I respond as below:
MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows:
The evidence reveals that there was a gap in the provision of care for individuals suffering
with autism and in crisis, which remains the case today both in Devon and nationally.
Evidence was heard that a gap exists with autistic people in distress and or dysregulation
with no treatable mental health condition and there is a grey area around treatment. This
is beyond the skills of social care providers. And unless the individual meets the criteria
for treatment under the Mental Health Act there is very little support:
At the time of, and during the period leading up to Mr Compton’s death, as you highlight the
Trust and wider Devon system did not have access to a specific autism crisis team. This was,
and remains, a known gap in commissioning across the country.
in her testimony in court, the Devon Adult
At the time, as described by
Autism Intervention Team (DAAIT), had recently been commissioned to provide a countywide
service for autistic adults with the aim to:
• Prevent unnecessary hospital admission
• Reduce length of stay
• Prevent placement/accommodation breakdown including within family home
• Support the individual and their team(s)/supporters to better understand where
autism is impacting on the person’s stability, and the barriers to
interventions/treatment options and solutions, where autism is the key or
contributing factor to individuals needs/concerns.
Chair:
Chief Executive:
also explained, DAAIT at that time were in the developmental phase and
As
not yet operational. The team was not scheduled to become operational (become open to
referrals, commence clinical work) until April 2020. This timeframe was achieved.
However, had DAAIT been operational at the time of Mr Compton’s distress there still
would not have been a specific dedicated autism crisis pathway that he could access.
The DAAIT service operates with a duty worker system 5 days per week, staffed by team
members. Because of the low demand on duty in terms of volume of queries, and DAAIT
service not commissioned to provide an “urgent response”, there is a time frame for
response of 48hrs, predominantly this accessed via email queries. This provision is
noted in the service Standard Operating Procedure. If there was a significant concern
that there was an immediate threat to life then the staff member dealing with the query
would contact the police via 999.
DAAIT is a very small team, and as part of its commissioning it is explicitly not able to
provide:
• A care coordination function, and as a result the expectation is that DAAIT staff
will work as part of the overall health and/or social care network around the
person at that time. Any work, regardless of tier, will be time limited.
• An emergency or crisis response.
• Services/treatment which can be provided by mainstream services, with
reasonable adjustments.
Subsequent regional developments:
Regionally the lack of specifically designed inpatient environments to best assesses/treat
adults with a learning disability and/or who are autistic with co-morbid mental health
issues was acknowledged by NHS England and led to a range of funding to build x2 ten
bedded inpatient units for this cohort. Devon Partnership Trus t has been the lead
provider for one of these (The Brook), which is currently under construction in Dawlish,
Devon, and is due to open summer 2025. The other unit (The Kingfisher) is being built in
Bristol but is not due to open until later in 2026.
As part of the regional development a Learning Disability/Autism Outreach team has
been commissioned to sit alongside each unit as part of what is being seen as regional a
Learning Disability/Autism service. The LD/A outreach linked with The Brook, is due to
become operational at a similar time to the unit opening.
It is important to stress that the LD/A Outreach is not commissioned to provide crisis
support/intervention in the same way that mental health crisis/home treatment teams are
but will be able to work closely with these teams and other services, the patients network
etc providing specific autism relevant advice/guidance and interventions.
Benjamin was removed from his GP practice due to violent behaviour and
allocated to the Special Allocation Scheme. This scheme was not able to meet the
needs of a patient such as Benjamin with a diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder.
Devon Partnership NHS Trust are not able to comment on this specific question as it is a Primary
Care/GP related one.
Page 2 of 3
I trust the above responds clearly to your question.
Yours sincerely
Chief Nursing Officer and Allied Professionals Lead
Page 3 of 3
NHS Devon Aperture House Pynes Hill Rydon Lane Exeter EX2 5AZ 01392 205 205 NHS Devon Response to Regulation 28 Report to Prevent Future Deaths To: HM Coroner Mr Spinney In the matter of: Benjamin Robert Compton Coroner’s Case Reference: Date of Regulation 28 Report: 19th March 2025 Date of NHS Devon Response: 4th June 2025 Dear Mr Spinney, NHS Devon acknowledges receipt of the Regulation 28 report following the inquest into the death of Benjamin Robert Compton. We would first like to extend our condolences to Benjamin’s family, friends, and all those who cared for and supported him. We recognise the impact of his death and the importance of the coroner's concerns in ensuring future improvements to the health and care system. This letter sets out NHS Devon’s response to the matters of concern you have identified. Matters of Concern and Responses Concern 1: The evidence reveals that there was a gap in the provision of care for individuals suffering with autism and in crisis, that remains the case today both in Devon and nationally. Evidence was heard that a gap exists with autistic people in distress and or dysregulation with no treatable mental health condition and there is a grey area around treatment. This is beyond the skills of social care providers. And unless the individual meets the criteria for treatment under the Mental Health Act there is very little support. Consideration should be given to reviewing the process of supporting and providing interventions to those individuals suffering with autism and in crisis. Response: Devon ICB recognises the existing commissioning gap for individuals with autism who experience crisis. In response, significant work has been undertaken in 2023–2024 to raise awareness and implement reasonable adjustments to better meet their mental health needs. In 2022, Devon received capital investment to develop a new community inpatient service dedicated to people with learning disabilities and autism requiring mental health treatment. This regional centre, one of two in the Southwest, aims to become a centre of excellence providing specialist expertise, training, and system-wide support. The first inpatient beds are scheduled to open in June 2025. Alongside this, an outreach and inreach service will be integrated into the pathway to prevent unnecessary admissions and ensure timely, appropriate care. Furthermore, the implementation of the Oliver McGowan mandatory training will enhance community skills and promote reasonable adjustments across services, ensuring that autistic individuals in crisis receive appropriate support. To review and improve current processes for crisis support, the Learning Disability and Neurodiversity commissioning team will conduct a comprehensive community delivery review in 2025/2026. This review will cover primary care, secondary care, social care, and acute services to optimise care pathways for this population. A full commissioning review and improvement plan will also be presented to the Devon ICB executive in the last quarter of this financial year. Concern 2: Benjamin was removed from his GP practice due to violent behaviour and allocated to the Special Allocation Scheme. This scheme was not able to meet the needs of a patient such as Benjamin with a diagnosis of Autism Spectrum Disorder. Consideration should be given to ensuring that when patients are allocated to the GP Special Allocation Scheme they are properly assessed as being suitable for the scheme and receive the appropriate clinical care and treatment. Response: We have previously made improvements to processes and requirements in this scheme since this case. The changes include reviewing the process the practice has followed to ensure it meets all the requirements for allocation to the Special Allocation Scheme and where an appeal is made, the panel agenda has clear items to check/ensure the practice has followed the appropriate processes for assigning to the scheme. Regarding the application of our process in this case, we have also reflected previously on this case that a choice should have been given to whether the family wished for the appeal panel to take place, following this person's death, rather than ceasing all communication in an intended act of respect. Following receiving this Prevention of Future Deaths notice we have additionally considered what extra action can be taken to additionally strengthen arrangements. We have determined to make a modification to the Special Allocation Scheme Standard Operating Procedures (SOP) that specifically requires written confirmation from Practices that they considered all possible alternative approaches to providing primary medical services prior to making the placement. This change was enacted in May 2025. 2 In summary the death of Benjamin highlights the need for continued improvement in how services respond to autistic individuals in crisis. Devon ICB is committed to taking forward the actions outlined above, strengthening our approach, and working with partners to ensure compassionate, appropriate, and timely support is available when it is most needed. Should any further information or clarification be required, we would be pleased to provide it. Yours sincerely, Primary Care Medical Director, NHS Devon 3
Mr Philip Spinney
HM Senior Coroner
County of Devon, Plymouth and Torbay
County Hall
Topsham Road
Exeter
EX2 4QD
National Medical Director
NHS England
Wellington House
133-155 Waterloo Road
London
SE1 8UG
14 May 2025
Dear Coroner,
Re: Regulation 28 Report to Prevent Future Deaths – Benjamin Robert
Compton who died on 1 February 2022
Thank you for your Report to Prevent Future Deaths (hereafter “Report”) dated 19
March 2025 (concerning the death of Benjamin Robert Compton on 1 February 2022.
In advance of responding to the specific concerns raised in your Report, I would like
to express my deep condolences to Benjamin’s family and loved ones. NHS England
are keen to assure the family and the Coroner that the concerns raised about
Benjamin’s care have been listened to and reflected upon.
Gap in the provision of care
Your Report raises concerns over a gap in the provision of care nationally for
individuals suffering with autism and in mental health crisis. It is for NHS Devon
Integrated Care Board, who I note you have also sent your Report to, to respond to
your concerns regarding provision of care within Devon.
NHS England recognises the seriousness of the issues raised regarding the care of
autistic individuals experiencing crisis, particularly where the threshold for detention
under the Mental Health Act is not met, but where proactive, multidisciplinary
intervention is still clearly needed. NHS England remains committed to working with
local systems to address such gaps and to reduce the risk of similar tragic outcomes.
In December 2023, NHS England published Meeting the Needs of Autistic Adults in
Mental Health Services, which provides guidance to Integrated Care Boards and
health providers on delivering accessible, autism-informed care. Key areas of
relevance to your Report include:
•
Improving crisis pathways by supporting tailored, multidisciplinary input for
autistic people, particularly where access to traditional mental health services
may be limited.
• Strengthening the interface between primary care and specialist mental
health services, ensuring autistic adults can access support for co-occurring
mental health needs at any level of care.
• Embedding sensory-informed care, including environmental adaptations and
the use of health passports, to improve accessibility and safety across both
urgent and planned care.
• Addressing diagnostic overshadowing, where a person’s autistic traits,
including communication style, behaviour, or presentation, are misattributed to
an existing mental health or neurodevelopmental condition, delaying
appropriate assessment or support.
• Maintaining access to timely clinical oversight and continuity of care,
especially for autistic individuals in acute distress.
In addition, NHS England’s Staying Safe from Suicide guidance (April 2025)
emphasises the importance of a whole-system approach to suicide prevention, which
that people
includes supporting personalised safety planning and ensuring
experiencing distress, regardless of diagnosis, are able
timely,
compassionate, and coordinated care. The guidance underscores the need for
services to work together to address gaps and transitions that may place individuals
at heightened risk.
to access
Special Allocation Scheme
Your Report also raises a concern over the Special Allocation Scheme (SAS) and
states that consideration should be given to ensuring that patients are properly
assessed as being suitable for the scheme before they are allocated, to ensure they
get the appropriate care and treatment.
GP contract regulations specify the grounds on which a contractor (i.e. a GP practice)
may request that a person be removed from its list of patients with immediate effect.
These are namely that:
a) the person has committed an act of violence against any of the persons
specified [essentially any member of the practice, a visitor or other patients] or
has behaved in such a way that any of those persons has feared for their safety.
b) the contractor has reported the incident to the police.
The regulations do not include a list of objectively defined behaviours or medical
conditions which are excluded from referral; this is in recognition of the complex
interactions that can take place in healthcare settings and the importance of ensuring
that practices can maintain a safe environment for their patients and their staff.
In practice, this means there is a balanced need for ‘careful considerations’ to be
undertaken. On the one hand, by the provider, prior to referring a patient into the
scheme and, on the other hand, by providers of GP SAS services when accepting a
patient on to the scheme.
NHS England publishes national guidance to GP practices and commissioners on the
implementation of, and commissioning and monitoring of, GP SAS services. This is
contained in Chapter 7 of NHS England » Primary medical services policy and
guidance manual (PGM).
The PGM was updated on 15 July 2024 to include the following key updates in the
SAS section:
a) Remind GP practices of the need to undertake careful considerations prior to
referring a patient into the scheme, having considered the patient’s protected
characteristics, past medical history, learning disability and neurodiversity.
b) Implement a prompt to GP practices when completing the online referral on the
need for careful consideration (Status: in the process of implementation).
c) An action request for commissioners to consider establishing and embedding
initial appropriateness assessments into all commissioned SAS services. This
would be subject to consideration when new services are commissioned or
when existing services are reviewed, as well as funding availability.
At the time of Benjamin’s death, a previous version of the PGM was in effect that did
not include these items. The PGM available at the time (and still present in the current
version) includes guidance on ‘behaviours this scheme does not ordinarily cover’.
Paragraph 7.4.14 of the PGM states:
“consideration should be given as to the history and circumstances of a patient
including:
• wherever the behaviour can be ascribed to a condition capable of being
rapidly alleviated by treatment, eg mental health illness or medical/acute
conditions with known behavioural changes (eg head injury)
• whether it relates to a patient who has never been aggressive before and/or
who is clearly suffering mental or physical distress
• careful consideration of any mitigating circumstances must be given as to
whether a referral to the scheme is in the best interests of the patient.”
SAS services exist to provide a secure environment to patients who have been
removed from their GP practice and allocated to the SAS scheme, so they can
continue to receive primary medical services (GP services). SAS providers are
commissioned to deliver primary medical services (through GP practices) with
additional safeguards in place for supporting violent patients. This will include, for
instance, ensuring that staff have a sufficient training and skill mix for supporting
violent patients, security provisions and considering patient rehabilitation needs for
addressing any contributing factors which may be influencing the behaviour. Aside
from ensuring patients have continuing access to GP services, the aim of the SAS is
to support rehabilitation and discharge patients back into mainstream GP services.
When patients are in the SAS, they can expect to receive the full range of primary
medical services as would be provided at any other GP practice and, as such, the
provision to receive appropriate clinical care and treatment is already a given
expectation of service.
I would also like to provide further assurances on the national NHS England work
taking place around the Reports to Prevent Future Deaths. All reports received are
discussed by the Regulation 28 Working Group, comprising Regional Medical
Directors, and other clinical and quality colleagues from across the regions. This
ensures that key learnings and insights around events, such as the sad death of
Benjamin, are shared across the NHS at both a national and regional level and helps
us to pay close attention to any emerging trends that may require further review and
action.
Thank you for bringing these important patient safety issues to my attention and please
do not hesitate to contact me should you need any further information.
Yours sincerely,
National Medical Director
See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Road (Highways Safety) related deaths, and how often a new one appears.
What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text
Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.
These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.