Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2020
Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2020-0073, written 20 Mar 2020. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.
| Date of report | 20 Mar 2020 |
|---|---|
| Reference | 2020-0073 |
| Deceased | John Gregory |
| Coroner | Mary Hassell |
| Coroner area | Inner North London |
| Category | Care Home Health related deaths |
| Organisation named | University College London Hospitals NHS Trust |
| Source | judiciary.uk record · original PDF |
| Responses published | 1 |
Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.
Regulation 28: Prevention of Future Deaths report
John Francis GREGORY (died 07.10.19)
THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO:
1. Mr Jim Easton
Chief Executive Officer, Health Care
Care UK Community Partnerships Ltd
Connaught House
850 The Crescent
Colchester Business Park
Colchester
Essex CO4 9QB
2.
Corporate Medical Director
University College London Hospitals NHS Trust (UCLH)
University College Hospital
2nd Floor Central
250 Euston Road
London NW1 2PG
1
CORONER
I am: Coroner ME Hassell
Senior Coroner
Inner North London
St Pancras Coroner’s Court
Camley Street
London N1C 4PP
2
CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS
I make this report under the Coroners and Justice Act 2009,
paragraph 7, Schedule 5, and
The Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013,
regulations 28 and 29.
3
INVESTIGATION and INQUEST
On 21 October 2019, I commenced an investigation into the death of
John Francis Gregory, aged 93 years. The investigation concluded at the
end of the inquest on 17 March 2020. I made a narrative determination
at inquest, which I attach.
1
4
CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH
Mr Gregory was taken into hospital for a short stay and then from there
to St Pancras Hospital Rehabilitation Unit Evergreen Ward, a satellite of
UCLH. After seven weeks he was discharged to Muriel Street Resource
Centre, a residential and nursing home run by Care UK, where he stayed
for three weeks until he was brought back in to hospital.
His medical cause of death was:
1a
1b
1c
2
acute kidney injury
hypovolaemia due to low oral fluid intake
Alzheimer’s disease and old age
hypertension
5
CORONER’S CONCERNS
During the course of the inquest, the evidence revealed matters giving
rise to concern. In my opinion, there is a risk that future deaths will occur
unless action is taken. In the circumstances, it is my statutory duty to
report to you.
The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows.
Mr Gregory died because he had not been drinking enough, though his
Alzheimer’s was not end stage, and before he was admitted to hospital
he had been mobile; able to wash, dress and feed himself; and enjoy a
good quality of life.
St Pancras Rehabilitation Unit Evergreen Ward
1. Whilst the sister in charge of Evergreen plainly led from the front
and expected the highest standards, these were not always
maintained by every member of staff.
On one occasion, a member of staff refused Mr Gregory’s family
assistance to take him to the toilet; on more than one occasion his
family found him in wet bedclothes; and he was put to bed at
7.30pm to fit in with nursing routine.
2. His oral fluid intake was considered by Evergreen Ward, and
steps were taken to address this, but the intake recorded on his
charts demonstrate that it remained too low.
Maintaining sufficient fluid intake was a challenge, but there is the
possibility that not every member of staff encouraged him to drink
and eat in the way the sister in charge did.
2
Muriel Street Resource Centre
3. On the day he was readmitted to hospital from Muriel Street, Mr
Gregory’s family found him slumped unconscious in a public area
of the home, a fact unnoticed by any member of staff.
He was not properly strapped in to a wheelchair, slipping down
because his feet were not on the foot rests. He was cold and
inadequately dressed, with his shirt undone and not wearing
socks. By then Mr Gregory was not capable of dressing himself.
4. Mr Gregory’s oral fluid intake was also too low at Muriel Street, a
nursing home specialising in the care of those with dementia.
On his last day at the home, Mr Gregory was described in the
nursing notes as drinking, but his chart showed that he had drunk
nothing since a cup of tea at 8.20am. The ambulance was called
at 5.17pm.
The fact that he had not drunk the whole day was not escalated
to a senior member of staff and there was no evidence that any
steps had been taken to deal with this.
His fluid intake chart recorded him as repeatedly declining drinks,
even at a time after he had lost consciousness and an ambulance
had already been called for him.
This demonstrates that the chart was inaccurate. It raises the
possibility that the chart was inaccurate in other ways. It raises
the possibility that when Mr Gregory was described as declining
drinks, in fact staff were not taking any steps to encourage him to
drink, or to eat.
6
ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN
In my opinion, action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I
believe that you have the power to take such action.
7
YOUR RESPONSE
You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date
of this report, namely by 18 May 2020. I, the coroner, may extend the
period.
Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be
taken, setting out the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain
why no action is proposed.
3
8
COPIES and PUBLICATION
I have sent a copy of my report to the following.
HHJ Mark Lucraft QC, the Chief Coroner of England & Wales
Care Quality Commission for England
inspection manager, adult social care,
Camden, Islington & Enfield
granddaughter of John Gregory.
I am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your
response.
The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted
or summary form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who
he believes may find it useful or of interest. You may make
representations to me, the Senior Coroner, at the time of your response,
about the release or the publication of your response by the Chief
Coroner.
9
DATE SIGNED BY SENIOR CORONER
20.03.20 ME Hassell
4
1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.
Care UK also has "How to Guides", supported by the wheelchair user manual,
specifically in relation to wheelchair safety guidance and transporting a person in a
wheelchair. Copies of these guides are attached. These guides are accessible to all
staff within Muriel Street, and outline the safety checks that must be undertaken to
ensure the safety of residents, including the use of footplates and safety belts.
Notwithstanding this, since Mr Gregory's sad death, Muriel Street has reviewed the
manual handling training provided. Following this, it was identified that the training
surrounding the use of wheelchairs could be strengthened. Consequently, the training
has been improved, and the manual handling training now includes a specific section
on wheelchair safety guidance. This includes highlighting and working through the
"How to Guide – Wheelchair safety Guidance" (copy attached) during the training
session. Due to the current pandemic, and the consequent restrictions placed upon
the ability to provide group training, Muriel Street has undertaken 1:1 supervision /
training sessions with all staff members in order to go through the how to guide, and
ensure staff are familiar with the expectations set out therein. Further, there is now a
laminated copy of this guide at every nurse's station to ensure that the guide is easily
accessible. Additionally, where a resident's care plan requires the use of a wheelchair,
a hard copy of the guide is placed into that resident's care plan folder in their room.
Muriel Street has also increased staffing levels since this incident, and there is now an
increased senior presence on each floor with a senior manager (Deputy Manager,
Clinical Lead or Care lead) based in each nursing office and the addition of a team
leader who supports to carry out regular walk arounds of their floor / unit. The result of
this is greater oversight of staff activities and monitoring of residents to ensure that
residents' needs and safety are maintained.
Muriel Street also undertakes specific welfare checks upon residents at regular
intervals throughout the day. Previously, whilst such checks would have been
undertaken during the day as part of other care provision (e.g. during meal provision,
or regular repositioning), there would be no separate documentation during daytimes.
Having reviewed matters, since April 2020, in accordance with Care UK policy Muriel
Street has now ensured that the welfare check sheets are completed during the day
alongside the other documentation ie food and fluid charts, activities log books, turning
charts and daily notes in addition to at night where they were previously completed.
The documentation is kept in the resident's care plan folder in their room, (together
with a sample completed form to assist and guide staff on how to complete this
documentation) and is now regularly audited by the Home Manager who now as part of
the daily checklist undertakes a random audit of documentation every day in order to
ensure that these checks are being undertaken, residents are being properly
monitored and the documentation is being completed to the expected standard across
the home (details of documentation training are outlined below)
2. Being found inadequately dressed shortly before his transfer to hospital.
Care UK and Muriel Street take the safety, welfare and dignity of residents seriously.
To this end, there are a number of systems, policies and guides which govern and
guide staff in this respect We attach a number of policy documents, together with
"How to Guides" and "Ways of Working" documents in support.
In relation to a resident's clothing, an inventory of a resident’s clothes is taken when
they are admitted into the care home and then all of the clothes are individually
labelled. The laundry room has named trays for each resident so that the clothes are
returned to the correct resident’s room. In addition to the above, there is also the
Page 2 of 6
“Resident of the Day” process whereby every month a resident's care is reviewed as a
whole. This includes the checking of wardrobes and clothing labels to ensure that a
resident's clothing is in order.
In order to ensure that a resident's dignity is preserved, there are a number of policies
and guides in place, all of which re-inforce the need to ensure that a resident's dignity
is respected and observed at all times. Part of this is to ensure a resident is
appropriately dressed and personal care training extends to checking that the clothing
belongs to the correct resident and is appropriate for the conditions. Whilst every effort
is made to encourage a resident and to engage with them in this aspect of personal
care, there are times when a resident may be non-compliant. In such instances, the
expectation as set out within the policies is that this is clearly documented and
depending upon the nature of the refusal, escalated to senior colleagues or external
healthcare providers (e.g. the GP) as appropriate.
Staff are provided with training on this matter during the two week induction training
course, the content of which is attached, which includes person centred care, privacy
and dignity and the training compliance report previously referred to. The competency
sign off sheet for personal care is also attached.
Since this incident, the requirement to ensure that resident's are appropriately dressed
was specifically discussed during the daily "Take 10" meetings for senior staff, and
during handovers when all other staff would attend. During these meetings, posters,
which are now placed in each resident's wardrobe, outlining examples ways in which a
resident may wish to be dressed depending upon the weather, drawing upon the
circumstances of Mr Gregory as an example of an unacceptable standard of care.
Further, staff were reminded of the requirement to document any issues with clothing
(e.g. non-compliance) within a resident's care plan file.
It is the firm intention of Muriel Street that all staff will undergo a personal care training
refresher course once the current pandemic and consequent lifting on restrictions
allow.
Finally, as outlined previously, Muriel Street now has increased staffing levels and an
increased senior presence on each floor / unit with regular walk arounds by senior
team members to ensure that the high standards expected by Care UK are being met.
3. Being found in an unconscious state without any apparent staff support or
monitoring.
The welfare and safety of residents in the foremost priority of Care UK and Muriel
Street. As outlined above, the documentation of separate and regular welfare checks
during the day are now in place at Muriel Street. In order to support staff in this regard,
the need for separate welfare checks was discussed and explored at both the "Take
10" and handover meetings to ensure that all staff are aware of this new requirement,
what is expected and how to complete the documentation fully and accurately. It is the
expectation that the welfare check documentation would be checked daily by a nurse
in order to ensure that any matters of concern are noted and actioned as required.
Additionally, as outlined above, this documentation is also regularly audited as part of
the Home Managers daily checklist to ensure such checks are undertaken, and
documented appropriately.
Page 3 of 6
Also, as outlined above, Muriel Street has increased the staffing ratio, resulting in
greater senior staff presence on each floor / unit, prompting greater and more effective
oversight of staff and the monitoring of the welfare of residents.
Additionally, since Mr Gregory's death, all nursing staff have undertaken a clinical skills
workshop, part of which deals with the identification of the deteriorating patient and
monitoring of the same, details of which are attached. Part of this course deals with
the Restore2 deterioration tool which has now been rolled out at Muriel Street – details
of which are below.
Further, Muriel Street has also undertaken a significant amount of focussed learning
and training of both clinical and care staff in relation to the identification and escalation
of a potentially deteriorating resident. This has been done via the Significant 7 training
package, which is a training tool developed and administered by NELFT NHS
Foundation Trust. The course is designed to enable non-clinical staff to identify and
act upon "soft" signs of deterioration. Broad details of the course can be found at
https://www.nelft.nhs.uk/significant-7. Since September 2019, the Home Manager at
Muriel Street has become a registered trainer for the Significant 7 course, and all staff
at Muriel Street have undergone the Significant 7 course. It also now forms part of the
induction training for new members of staff.
To supplement this, since April 2020, Muriel Street has also rolled out the Restore2
deterioration tool (which is based upon the NEWS2 system commonly used across
actual hospitals). A copy of the Restore2 documentation is attached and is contained
within each resident's care plan file, and updated monthly by a nurse. The Restore
tool assists staff members to be able to recognise the early signs that a resident may
be deteriorating (as per the Significant 7 course), and then guides nursing staff on
appropriate escalation and frequency of monitoring if required to ensure a resident is
provided with timely and appropriate medical intervention. It should also be noted that
the tool recognises that not all residents are the same, and therefore there is the ability
to record additional signs of possible deterioration specific to a resident.
The Restore 2 system is a paper based system. In order to seek improvement, the
nursing unit at Muriel Street is part of a trial, involving a number of other organisations
in the local authority area, of an electronic monitoring system called Whazam. This
system allow staff to electronically record a resident's vital observations and then
calculates a NEWS2 score, prompting actions as necessary. The electronic system
also shares a resident's vital observations with local GP surgeries and if necessary the
London Ambulance Service, to ensure speedy and effective transfer of vital information
should the need arise.
4. Monitoring a resident's oral fluid intake
Care UK and Muriel Street recognises the importance of ensuring that a resident's
hydration is carefully monitored. There are a number of policies and guides in place to
assist staff and highlight the importance of this aspect of care.
In this case there are 2 specific areas of concern raised by the Coroner:
Efforts to encourage residents to take oral fluids and escalation of concerns
Care UK has policies, "ways of working" and "how to guides" to assist staff in
supporting residents to take oral fluids and maintain hydration. Copies of the same are
attached. You will see from these that there is a clear expectation that residents' oral
intake is monitored and concerns over the same escalated and reviewed (for instance
Page 4 of 6
at weekly clinical review meetings). Further, in the event of more acute concerns in
relation to oral fluid intake, the matter should be raised with the visiting GP to consider
and advise, as occurred in Mr Gregory's case.
The "ways of working" and "how to guides", which are easily accessible by staff,
provide information and guidance on the importance of hydration and the need for
some resident's to have repeated encouragement to take oral fluids, together with
suggested methods to encourage increased oral fluid intake. The guides also highlight
the consequence of insufficient hydration and checklists for action in the event that
there are signs of dehydration.
Since the death, Muriel Street has started and continues to educate staff of the need to
encourage residents with oral intake of fluids. This has been done during "Take 10"
and handover meetings. During these meetings all staff have been advised of the
reasons why encouragement of oral fluids is so important, followed by an explanation
and discussion of the ways of working and how to guides. Further, hard copies of
these guides are now included in the resident's care plan file in their room. This
provides easier staff access to the guides and serves as a constant reminder to staff of
the importance to encourage oral fluid intake.
Additionally, once the current restrictions in place due to the pandemic are lifted, Muriel
Street will be undertaking mandatory dining room training for staff, part of which
provides training to staff on the need to encourage residents to increase oral intake
generally, as well as refreshing techniques / methods to encourage residents to do the
same.
Recording of fluid balance and the accuracy of the same
Clearly, part of ensuring a resident is taking sufficient oral fluid is to monitor oral intake
via the fluid chart. Every staff member attends document training in addition to the
induction training when they join the care home. This training outlines the
documentation that staff are expected to complete and how to complete the same.
Muriel Street has reviewed the fluid charts used and has introduced new fluid balance
monitoring documentation – copies attached. The new charts are clearer and enable
details of a resident's input / output to be recorded in more detail. Further, staff are
now instructed to document when the re-attempt to provide oral fluids to ensure that
there is evidence of active encouragement.
In addition to the balance chart, there is also a fluid target record chart which is to be
completed. This is completed daily and prompts active consideration by a nurse of a
resident's fluid balance, and what consequential actions are required, ensuring a
proactive approach to a resident's oral fluid intake. Any concerns are discussed at
handover meetings with the clinical lead. Further, if there are lower level concerns,
these are raised and discussed at the weekly clinical review meeting, in order to review
the situation and decide upon future management.
All staff members have been trained in the use and completion of these new
documents via discussions during the Take 10 and handover meetings, during which
the forms are gone through in detail, the expectations of staff made clear, and the
relevant how guides provided. The how to guides for the completion of the chart is
also now included with the fluid charts contained in a resident's care plan file.
In order to ensure that these new charts are being completed correctly, all staff have
been the fluid balance documentation is included in the regular random audit of
documentation outlined above. Recent audits have demonstrated that not only are the
Page 5 of 6
documents being completed in full, but there is also now documentation of repeated
encouragement to take oral fluid.
As is clear from the above, there has been a number of changes made since the death.
Ordinarily group training would be provided in order to re-inforce the improvements made.
However, given the current pandemic, this has not been possible, and training has instead
taken place in smaller groups. Notwithstanding this, once the current restrictions have been
lifted, it is the intention of Muriel Street to have full group training on the following relevant
areas:
Manual handling – with the additional focus of wheelchair safety
Personal care – with an additional emphasis upon dress
Dining – with an additional emphasis upon encouraging oral fluid intake
Documentation – with specific reference to the updated welfare checks regime, and
the new documentation that has been introduced across a number of areas.
Additionally, Muriel Street would usually hold regular staff meetings / lessons learned
sessions. Again, due to the number of staff, this has not been possible due to the current
restrictions. However, once such restrictions have been lifted, Muriel Street intend to have a
series of group staff meetings and lessons learned session during which the issues and
concerns raised as a result of this case, and the changes made will be discussed in full.
As outlined at the beginning of this response, Care UK and Muriel Street takes the safety and
wellbeing of resident's extremely seriously, and has in place a robust system to ensure that
the high standard we expect are met. Nevertheless we also seek to learn and continue to
improve. We are therefore confident that we have implemented a robust series of
improvements, which will result in greater staff understanding and, timely and appropriate
response to the matters of concern highlighted.
Yours sincerely,
Muriel Street Registered Manager
Page 6 of 6
See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching University College London Hospitals NHS Trust, and how often a new one appears.
What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text
Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.
These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.