Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2021

Jaden Francois-Espirit

Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2021-0048, written 22 Feb 2021. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.

Date of report22 Feb 2021
Reference2021-0048
DeceasedJaden Francois-Espirit
CoronerMary Hassell
Coroner areaInner North London
CategorySuicide (from 2015) · Mental Health related deaths · Emergency services related deaths (2019 onwards)
Sourcejudiciary.uk record · original PDF
Responses published1

The report

Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.

Regulation 28:  Prevention of Future Deaths report 

Jaden Matthew FRANCOIS-ESPRIT (died 26.08.20) 

THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: 

1. 

Commissioner 
London Fire Brigade 
169 Union Street 
London SE1 0LL 

1 

CORONER 

I am:   Coroner ME Hassell 
           Senior Coroner  
           Inner North London 
           St Pancras Coroner’s Court 
           Camley Street 
           London  N1C 4PP 

2 

CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS 

I make this report under the Coroners and Justice Act 2009,  
paragraph 7, Schedule 5, and  
The Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013, 
regulations 28 and 29. 

3 

INVESTIGATION and INQUEST 

On 3 September 2020, I commenced an investigation into the death of 
Jaden  Francois-Esprit,  aged  21  years.  The  investigation  concluded  at 
the end of the inquest on 15 February 2021.  I made a determination of 
suicide. 

4 

CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH 

Jaden hanged himself at home on the 25th or 26th of August 2020.  In the 
last  few  weeks  of  his  life  he  became  more  withdrawn,  including  at  his 
place of work as a firefighter.  He felt isolated, though in reality he had 
friends there and was well liked, as well as being loved by his family. 

5 

CORONER’S CONCERNS 

1 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 During the course of the inquest, the evidence revealed matters giving 
rise to concern. In my opinion, there is a risk that future deaths will occur 
unless  action  is  taken.  In  the  circumstances,  it  is  my  statutory  duty  to 
report to you. 

The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows.  

Unbeknown  to  those  with  whom  he  worked  at  Wembley  Fire  Station, 
Jaden’s  mental  well  being  was  deteriorating  significantly  in  the  last 
weeks of his life, and it deteriorated to the point where he killed himself.   

I heard at inquest that the London Fire Brigade has quite sophisticated 
systems  in  place  to  support  firefighters  suffering  mental  ill  health.  
However,  Jaden  was  not  offered  the  support  of,  for  example, 
psychological counselling, because it was not appreciated that he was 
so very low.   

Obviously  if  firefighters  are  to  be  given  the  best  chance  of  recovering 
from mental ill health, their difficulties first need to be recognised. 

I  appreciate  that  it  can  be  difficult  to  detect  that  a  person  may  be 
depressed or exceptionally unhappy.  Signs may be subtle and require a 
nuanced approach.   

  Jaden often complained that he was bored because Wembley Green 
Watch had not been called to many incidents.  I heard evidence that 
boredom in a new firefighter can be quite common.  However, I also 
heard that a complaint of boredom can be a sign of a person with 
dyslexia avoiding an unpalatable or daunting task.   

  Jaden  had  dyslexia  and  was  worried  that  he  would  not  be  able  to 
complete  his  written  work  in  order  to  become  a  fully  qualified 
firefighter, yet the reality was that his station officer was fully aware 
of  his  difficulties  and  had  tried  to  reassure  Jaden  that  he  was 
certainly capable of achieving his goal.   

  He did need extra time, the space to make mistakes and a degree of 
sensitivity that was not always afforded him.  On the other hand, he 
asked for help and was given a mentor, but did not make use of him 
and  so  eventually  the  mentorship  ceased.    That  request  for  help 
followed by a refusal of help was not explored.  Such an exploration 
might  have  led  to  a  greater understanding  of  how  Jaden  could  be 
helped. 

  Jaden felt he was being treated unfairly at work and his family have 
formed the view that there was an element of racism there, driven in 
part  by  their  belief  that  Jaden  was  the  only  non  white  person  on 
Wembley Green Watch.  Yet the reality was that he joined a watch 
where a quarter of the firefighters were people of colour.   

2 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
   He described being teased about bringing chicken, rice and peas to 
work  to  eat,  thinking  that  this  teasing  was  because  the  food  was 
Caribbean.  Looking at this from the outside, chicken, rice and peas 
seems a dish without obvious world origin.  Moreover, I heard about 
a  huge  variety  of  food  being  brought  to  work  by  firefighters,  with 
some even weighing their food before eating.  None of this sits easily 
with a dish of chicken, rice and peas resulting in a racist comment. 

Jaden’s interior life did not always accord with what was going on around 
him.  Most of all he felt isolated, and yet it was clear to me that he there 
was a lot of affection for him at the fire station.  He did not always feel 
comfortable  there.    It  is  not  necessarily  an  easy  task  to  unearth  such 
feelings  in  a  colleague  but,  if  it  results  in  such  a  tragedy  as this being 
avoided, it is a worthwhile one. 

I should be grateful if you, or whoever you delegate to investigate this 
matter, would listen to the entirety of the recording of this inquest.  The 
London Fire Brigade investigation report already produced, talks in some 
detail about the station culture.  There were so many different aspects to 
the evidence that, without listening to the whole inquest, I am afraid that 
any understanding will not be as meaningful as it could be. 

6 

ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN 

In  my  opinion,  action  should  be  taken  to  prevent  future  deaths  and  I 
believe that you have the power to take such action.  

7 

YOUR RESPONSE 

You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date 
of this report, namely by 19 April 2021.  I, the coroner, may extend the 
period. 

Your  response  must  contain  details  of  action  taken  or proposed  to  be 
taken, setting out the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain 
why no action is proposed. 

8 

COPIES and PUBLICATION 

I have sent a copy of my report to the following. 

 
  HHJ Thomas Teague QC, the Chief Coroner of England & Wales 

, Jaden’s mum 

I  am  also  under  a  duty  to  send  a  copy  of  your  response  to  the  Chief 
Coroner and all interested persons who in my opinion should receive it.  

3 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 I  may  also  send  a  copy  of  your  response  to  any  other  person  who  I 
believe may find it useful or of interest.  

The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted 
or summary form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who 
he  believes  may  find  it  useful  or  of  interest.  You  may  make 
representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response, about 
the release or the publication of your response. 

9 

DATE                                                  SIGNED BY SENIOR CORONER 

22.02.21                                              ME Hassell 

4

Responses

1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.

Response from London Fire Brigade (PDF)
Dllm 

I.O Nr,vN F!Rt rmtC.ADE 

Coroner ME Hassell 
Senior Coroner 
ln ner North London 
St Pancras Coroner's Court 
Carnley Street 
London N1 C 4PP 

Dear Coroner 

1.011dol\ r,1 è Or,g.id~ He,1dqut1ne1::; 
'69JnronSt1eel  londot'I  S.E I Oll 

londor- -Ice go ... uk 

I hCI LC1nd1m f !lt' Comrr.;v,1p1,,•, 1, 1ht> 
fn,·  nel '('r',f  ,l11lhöuly !(1-1 
,•PdO!l 

Date  10 June 2021 

Response to Regulation 28: Prevention of Future Deaths Report 

I write in response to the prevention of future deaths report ['PFD report') you issued following the 
inquest touching the death of Jaden Francois-Esprit. 

I am grateful that you have noted the contents of the London Fire Brigade ['LFB'J investigation report, 
which was produced in response to Jaden's death. As you know that report identified a number of 
areas in which the Brigade could better serve its employees, particularly in the initial stages of their 
employment. 

LFB action plan following Jaden's death 

ln advance of the inquest all 24 recommendations in the investigation report were accepted by LFB's 
senior leadership team. These were turned into an action plan for change across the organisation.  On 
receipt of your PFD report the action plan was extended to include the matters of concern raised 
therein. so far as they were not already identified by the LFB. 

A copy of the plan, with the status of actions as at 10 June 2021, is annexed to this letter. 

There are a total of 32 actions which LFB must complete to address the concerns you have raised in the 
PFD report and to fulfil the recommendations of its internal report.  These have been grouped into the 
following 11 broad areas: 

(1) Recruitment. Training and Learning Support; 
(2) Trans fer System: 
(3) Support to FF(D)s whilst at Station; 
(4)  Finance 
(5) Allocation 
(6) Other 
(7) Support for Death in Service 
(8) Culture 
(9)  Sharing the findings 

 (10)Proactively Identifying Mental lii-Health 
(11 )Further investigation 

Responsibility for each action has been assigned to a senior leader in the Brigade (i.e. Commissioner, 
Assistant Commissioner or Assistant Director) with a named senior officer tasked to complete the 
required work. Completion dates have been set for each action. 

Of the 32 items listed on the plan nine have been completed.  The remaining 23 are expected to be 
concluded in line with either the target date set or a revised date. which will be monitored by the 
People Board. 

The action plan is a standing item at the monthly People Services Board. led by the Director of People 
and attended by all Directors of LFB.  This provides the scrutiny required to ensure completion of all 
agreed actions.  Accordingly, all outstanding items will continue to be closely monitored. 

I hope this response provides you with the necessary assurance of the LFB's commitment to further 
improving the mental health of all its staff. 

London Fire Commissioner

Related reports

Other reports by Mary Hassell

See all →

More reports categorised “Suicide (from 2015)”

See all →

Track Suicide (from 2015)

See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Suicide (from 2015), and how often a new one appears.

What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text

Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.

These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.