Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2025
Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2025-0195, written 16 Apr 2025. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.
| Date of report | 16 Apr 2025 |
|---|---|
| Reference | 2025-0195 |
| Deceased | Sarah Cunningham |
| Coroner | Mary Hassell |
| Coroner area | Inner North London |
| Category | Alcohol, drug and medication related deaths · Railway related deaths |
| Source | judiciary.uk record · original PDF |
| Responses published | 1 |
Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.
Regulation 28: Prevention of Future Deaths report
Sarah Alison CUNNINGHAM (died 02.11.24)
THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO:
1. Chief Executive
Transport for London (TfL)
5 Endeavour Square
London E20 1JN
1
CORONER
I am: Coroner ME Hassell
Senior Coroner
Inner North London
St Pancras Coroner’s Court
Camley Street
London N1C 4PP
2
CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS
I make this report under the Coroners and Justice Act 2009,
paragraph 7, Schedule 5, and
The Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013,
regulations 28 and 29.
3
INVESTIGATION and INQUEST
On 7 November 2024, one of my assistant coroners, Ian Potter,
commenced an investigation into the death of Sarah Cunningham, aged
31 years. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 9 April
2025. I made a determination at inquest of accidental death.
4
CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH
Ms Cunningham jumped down onto the northbound track at Chalk Farm
London Underground Station at approximately 3.30am on Saturday, 2
November 2024 and walked into the tunnel. She was killed by a train 18
minutes later.
Although she jumped down onto the track rather than falling, she did not
form the intention to take her own life. She jumped onto the track
because she was intoxicated by a combination of alcohol, cocaine and
ketamine, and was only a sporadic user of drugs on a recreational basis.
1
5
CORONER’S CONCERNS
During the course of the inquest, the evidence revealed matters giving
rise to concern. In my opinion, there is a risk that future deaths will occur
unless action is taken. In the circumstances, it is my statutory duty to
report to you.
The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows.
I heard evidence at inquest that London Underground passenger
intoxication is recognised as a risk to London Underground staff.
Extreme intoxication is also known to be a risk to the individual who is
intoxicated. However, it struck me that the risk to the individual is not
necessarily at the forefront of TfL corporate thinking.
Clearly, individuals have responsibility for their own drinking and/or drug
taking and the consequences thereof. Intoxication carries additional risk
whatever the activity.
However, public transport is encouraged for many good reasons. Not
least, it is a matter of public policy that those who are or may become
intoxicated should make travel plans that do not involve being in charge
of a vehicle. The London Underground is an obvious alternative.
Realistically, some London Underground passengers will be intoxicated,
and that has to inform TfL’s corporate planning. I heard that there was a
TfL investigation following Sarah Cunningham’s death, but the learning
from that appears at present to be somewhat aspirational, without a
concrete plan.
6
ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN
In my opinion, action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I
believe that you have the power to take such action.
7
YOUR RESPONSE
You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date
of this report, namely by 16 June 2025. I, the coroner, may extend the
period.
Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be
taken, setting out the timetable for action. Otherwise, you must explain
why no action is proposed.
8
COPIES and PUBLICATION
2
I have sent a copy of my report to the following.
• The parents of Sarah Cunningham
• HHJ Alexia Durran, the Chief Coroner of England & Wales
I am also under a duty to send a copy of your response to the Chief
Coroner and all interested persons who in my opinion should receive it.
I may also send a copy of your response to any other person who I
believe may find it useful or of interest.
The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted
or summary form. She may send a copy of this report to any person who
she believes may find it useful or of interest. You may make
representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response, about
the release or the publication of your response.
9
DATE SIGNED BY SENIOR CORONER
16.04.25 ME Hassell
3
1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.
16 June 2025
HM Senior Coroner Mary Hassell
Inner North London
St Pancras Coroner’s Court
Camley Street
London, N1C 4PP
By email only –
Dear Madam,
Chief Operating Officer
Transport for London
Palestra
197 Blackfriars Road
London
SE1 8NJ
Inquest touching on the death of Sarah Cunningham
I write on behalf of Transport for London (TfL) regarding the Senior Coroner’s
Regulation 28 Prevention of Future Deaths (PFD) report dated 16 April 2025
following the inquest touching on the death of Sarah Cunningham.
Ms Cunningham’s inquest and the Prevention of Future Deaths (PFD) report
The inquest touching on the death of Sarah Cunningham took place on 9 April
2025 at Poplar Coroner’s Court. TfL was an Interested Person in the inquest and
witnesses from TfL attended to give evidence.
I would like to take this opportunity to repeat, on behalf of TfL, our sincere
condolences to the family and friends of Ms Cunningham for their tragic loss.
After the inquest, the Senior Coroner sent a PFD report to TfL raising the following
matter of concern:
‘I heard evidence at inquest that London Underground passenger intoxication is
recognised as a risk to London Underground staff. Extreme intoxication is also
known to be a risk to the individual who is intoxicated. However, it struck me that
the risk to the individual is not necessarily at the forefront of TfL corporate thinking.
Clearly, individuals have responsibility for their own drinking and/or drug taking and
the consequences thereof. Intoxication carries additional risk whatever the activity.
However, public transport is encouraged for many good reasons. Not least, it is a
matter of public policy that those who are or may become intoxicated should make
travel plans that do not involve being in charge of a vehicle. The London
Underground is an obvious alternative.
Realistically, some London underground passengers will be intoxicated, and that
has to inform TfL’s corporate planning. I heard that there was a TfL investigation
following Sarah Cunningham’s death, but the learning from that appears at present
to be somewhat aspirational, without a concrete plan.’
I am grateful to the Senior Coroner for raising these concerns and we set out below
TfL’s response in four sections. The first section sets out the actions that have
been developed in the light of our Formal Investigation into the incident and in
response to the area of concern made in the PFD report, with the following sections
expanding on our current work to address the risks from intoxication; our internal
approach to responding to and learning from formal incident investigations; and
finally a summary of the technology trials underway to reduce the risk of customers
getting hurt on the platform edge.
Response to PFD report
TfL has well-established policies and procedures for safeguarding children and
adults at risk. For example, we have established training, awareness-raising and
co-operative working with the Police, charities and other partners to prevent people
dying by suicide on our services.
However, through recent events, including the tragic death of Ms Cunningham, we
recognise that as an organisation, a significant step change is required in our
approach and how we protect our customers who are vulnerable in the moment,
for example through intoxication, from coming to harm when using our services. A
systemic approach is required to protecting vulnerable customers so that they get
home safely using our services. We are committed to embedding a comprehensive
understanding in our operating procedures and through staff awareness and
behaviour.
We have used insight from our work with others on safeguarding, to determine a
clear action plan to address temporary vulnerability. An adult may be ‘temporarily’
vulnerable through a range of factors, including intoxication from alcohol or drugs,
emotional distress or short-term illness putting them at greater risk of coming to
harm, through accident or injury or through being a victim of crime on our services.
Our priority is to embed ways to prevent intoxicated customers coming to harm as
recommended in the PFD report, but we must also consider similar circumstances
so that change is comprehensive and ultimately reduces the likelihood of death,
injury or serious harm on our services.
Our actions underway include:
• Completing a comprehensive review of current safeguarding risk
management across every TfL mode to identify gaps and priorities in
protection of vulnerable customers. We will complete this assessment by 30
August 2025. This review will result in a tailored action plan for each of our
transport modes. TfL’s Executive Safety Sub-Group will oversee progress
and hold each mode to account on their progress in implementing their plan
to prevent intoxicated and other vulnerable passengers coming to harm
when using TfL’s services.
• Widespread adoption across our frontline customer facing teams of the
Vulnerability Assessment Framework (VAF). The VAF is a systematic tool
used by policing and emergency services to quickly identify, assess and
respond to an individual. Its purpose is to ensure that a vulnerable person
receives appropriate support and protection. The VAF will be briefed out to
all frontline teams and be embedded in policies, procedures and rule books
– this process will be completed by March 2026.
• Overhaul of our safeguarding and vulnerability training for all frontline
customer facing teams and make it a core, mandatory part of competency
management and on-going professional development.
• Establish trials at five London Underground stations to test and learn from
deploying operational staff in different ways to further reduce the risk of
customers coming to harm when intoxicated. The purpose of running trials
is to assess feasibility and impact before scaling up across London
Underground stations. We are currently undertaking the planning and
preparatory work before mobilising to intervention phase in Autumn 2025.
The measures we plan to trial include:
o Dedicated, specially trained teams providing safeguarding patrols
o
on platforms and trains for night tube;
Increasing frequency of security patrols by station teams in the
evenings and into the night at quiet stations;
o Enhanced CCTV monitoring through station operations rooms and
central control centre of platforms and public areas to monitor
vulnerable customers;
o Appraisal of SMART cameras technology to detect erratic or
unusual behaviour and alert staff; and
o Adapting our ‘turn up and go procedure’ to get intoxicated and other
vulnerable customers home safe.
In May this year, we doubled the size of our night team of Transport Support and
Enforcement officers. These officers, accredited by the police and trained in
safeguarding, patrol the night tube, getting off at every station to check for
vulnerable customers including on the platforms, to make sure everyone gets
home safely.
TfL policies on intoxication
More broadly, since 2019, TfL has increasingly sought to mitigate the impacts of
intoxication on the network with a multi-strand approach.
This activity includes:
• Multi-channel customer communication campaigns encouraging
customers to take greater care after drinking alcohol. Increasing the
coverage and spread of activity during key times of year, including
summer and the winter festive period;
• On-network signage notifying customers of the ban on consuming alcohol
on public transport services;
• Colleague training and briefings to assist station staff to safely manage
intoxicated customers, including spotting and supporting vulnerable
customers and conflict management skills to prevent work-related violence
and aggression;
• Deployment of staff to higher risk locations within stations, such as the top
of escalators and platforms; and
• Collaboration with local authorities to manage the impacts of intoxication
and provide targeted support at key locations before customers get on the
tube.
Most recent data from staff and incident reporting suggests that the hotspot
locations of the West End and City, and traditional times for intoxicated related
incidents, are changing. The following recommendations were made from the most
recent activity:
• Broaden activity to cover the entire week, not just Thursdays, Fridays and
weekend.
• Expand the number of targeted stations for additional communications and
signage and staff patrols to stations in the top 25 hotspots, ensure all
colleagues at these locations are briefed on how to support intoxicated
customers and reduce the risk of customers coming to harm.
This work to address the impact of intoxication will now be fully incorporated into
our review on how we manage safeguarding risk and the improvement programme
approach set out above.
TfL’s approach to FIR recommendations
TfL has recently implemented a number of significant changes to the process
around critical health and safety investigations, including changes to the
management of recommendations arising from Formal Incident Reviews (FIRs).
This new way of working means that the investigation team complete the
investigation report with recommendations for the business.
Under the new process, the Chief Safety, Health and Environment Officer is
accountable for ensuring that business areas develop appropriate and effective
actions. Directors of the respective business areas are directly responsible for
formulating relevant actions to address recommendations, to contribute to
mitigating risks and addressing causal factors comprehensively. This takes place
in the weeks following completion of the investigation report. The enhanced level
of accountability has brought a focus around investigation recommendations with
the aim of bringing them to the forefront of corporate thinking. The actions set out
above reflect the recommendations made in TfL’s Formal Investigation into the
incident.
Work on improving safety of the Platform Train Interface
We recognise that some of our customers may access the track environment either
deliberately or unintentionally and may be unaware of the potential danger that
they are in.
As explained in TfL’s witness evidence at the inquest, we are prioritising action to
address this risk and will trial a number of new technologies this financial year
aimed at keeping our customers safe. We plan to trial technologies which will allow
us to identify customers on the track and allow us to respond so that we can keep
them safe. We will start these technology trials on the Docklands Light Railway,
the Central line and on the Piccadilly line.
The trials will use a mixture of existing and new camera technology and sensors
to identify incidents and will trigger an operational response to alert staff. As this
technology is new, we want to learn more about the efficacy of different
technologies in different locations and different environments. These trials, which
will start in autumn 2025, are being carried out with a clear view to the future. We
will therefore have the potential to use this technology across TfL services where
it can be demonstrated that it will help keep our customers safe.
Conclusion
I would like to offer again my heartfelt sympathy and condolences to Ms
Cunningham’s family and friends. We are determined as an organisation to learn
lessons from this tragic incident and to make our network as safe as possible for
all customers, particularly those who may be vulnerable.
I hope this response is helpful and welcome. Please contact me if I can be of any
further assistance.
Yours sincerely
Chief Operating Officer
Transport for London
See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Alcohol, drug and medication related deaths, and how often a new one appears.
What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text
Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.
These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.