Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2014

Tracey Rooke

Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2014-0435, written 9 Oct 2014. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.

Date of report9 Oct 2014
Reference2014-0435
DeceasedTracey Rooke
CoronerDavid Ridley
Coroner areaWiltshire & Swindon
CategoryRoad (Highways Safety) related deaths
Sourcejudiciary.uk record · original PDF
Responses publishednone published

The report

Text recovered by OCR from a scanned PDF. OCR is imperfect: check anything you rely on against the source PDF. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.

DAVID W. G. RIDLEY
Senior Coroner for Wiltshire and Swindon

REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS

THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO:

Senior Traffic Management Engineer
Wiltshire Council — Highways

County Hall

Trowbridge

Wiltshire

BA14 8JN

CORONER

lam DAVID W. G. RIDLEY, Senior Coroner for Wiltshire and Swindon

CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS

| make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and
regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013.

http://www. legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2009/25/schedule/5/paragraph/7
http://www. legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2013/1629/part/7/made

INVESTIGATION and INQUEST

On 14/03/2014 | commenced an investigation into the death of Tracy Michelle ROOKE aged 43.
The investigation concluded at the end of the Inquest on 06 October 2014. The conclusion of the
Inquest was that Tracy sustained multiple traumatic injuries as a result of a road traffic collision
that occurred on 13 March 2014 on the A3102 at Mile Elm, Wiltshire.

CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH
The circumstances of her death were that Tracey was travelling south along the A3102 at Mile
Elm having just negotiated a left hand bend when she lost control of her vehicle which then
crossed the centre of the highway before colliding with a van travelling in the opposite direction.
| found that the weather conditions and in particular thick fog and her unfamiliarity with the road
more tikely than not contributed to the incident and her death.

CORONER’S CONCERNS

During the course of the Inquest ! heard evidence from EEE whose role is the Force’s
Traffic Management and Road Safety Assessment Officer. He is a former Collision Investigator.
As part of his evidence he produced a copy of his report dated 26 June 2014 in respect of which
| believe you received a copy back in June.

In that report and specifically at pages 10 & 11 of the report, a copy of which | have attached to
this Regulation 28 report, he sets out a number of recommendations. | share the concerns that
are raised a: his report which focuses on identified issues concerning road signage,
the location of road signage and the current state of road signage in this particular area.

| am concerned that if these are not addressed that they potentially could contribute to future
road traffic incidents that may result in injury of even death.

| am additionally concerned having regard to the evidence that cave in respect of which
he indicated that whilst you have been given a copy of his report including recommendations that

Wiltshire & Swindon Coroner's Office, 26 Endless Street, Salisbury, Wiltshire, SP1 1DP
Tel 01722 438900 | Fax 01722 332223

no action would be taken until | make a report with a view to the prevention of future deaths.
That concerns me as if as Highways Authority you believe there is merit in relation to the
recommendations then it should not have to wait until a Coroner makes a report some months
after the Traffic Management and Road Safety Assessment Report is submitted before action is
taken.

ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN

In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and | believe you and your
organisation have power to. action and | would be grateful if you could consider the
recommendations made vila indicate whether or not they are to be implemented
together with a review of the Council's practice and procedure if there is no issue in relation to
the recommendations as regards implementing them sooner rather than waiting for a Regulation
28 report from a Coroner after an Inquest.

YOUR RESPONSE

You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, namely by
04 December 2014. |, the coroner, may extend the period.

Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the
timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed.

COPIES and PUBLICATION

| have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested Persons:-

P| Traffic Management and Road Safety Unit

| am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response.

The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form. He
may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of interest.
You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response, about the
release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner.

Dated 09 October 2014

Signature. “X> SX \
Senior Coroner for Wiltshire and Swindon

Wiltshire & Swindon Coroner's Office, 26 Endless Street, Salisbury, Wiltshire, SP1 1DP
Tel 01722 438900 | Fax 01722 332223

Discussion and recommendations

The A3102 at Mile Elm has previously been subject to a national speed restriction of
60mph for cars, reduced to 50mph on the 12 August 2013 following a national
speed limit review. The road layout and condition at the collision scene is such that,
in normal driving conditions, a car could travel through the bends at the maximum
permitted speed without issue. It is my opinion that the 50mph restriction is correct
for the road.

Road signs — there is a lack of consistency in that a ‘slippery road’ warning is only
given to drivers travelling south. The double bend sign (photograph 2) is in a poor
condition and the position of the sign pole is such that the signs are obscured by a
telegraph pole. Verge marker posts and chevron markers are ineffective due to
damage / vegetation or dirt.

\
Recommendation: A ‘slippery road’ warning sign should be provided to warn
drivers travelling north. The double bend sign for southbound traffic should be ®
replaced, with consideration for the sign pole being relocated to avoid it being
obscured by the telegraph pole. Verge marker posts / chevrons should be (~?
cleaned, damaged posts replaced and vegetation cut back and maintained — an
alternative could be to replace the verge markers and chevrons with more
modern flexible chevron posts on both approaches to the bends (example
below). This could reduce the level of signage / maintenance required whilst
highlighting the presence of the bends.

Road markings — these are in a worn condition. The double white line system for
southbound traffic does not commence until the apex of the bend (photograph 2)
allowing drivers the opportunity to overtake without an appropriate view ahead. The
‘catseyes’ within the white line system are in a poor condition and ineffective.

Recommendation: the road markings should be repainted, the solid white line
system for southbound traffic extended to approximately 100 metres prior to
the bend (this would be similar to the northbound approach). The ‘catseyes’
should be refurbished and maintained.

Farm access/mud on road — on rural roads with multiple farm access points, it is
inevitable that there will be a transfer of mud / debris onto the road surface. It is my
opinion that the amount of mud shown in photograph 10 is excessive and
unacceptable. The mud, unless cleared promptly, will be spread by traffic and
extending the area of road and signage affected.

Page 10 of 11

Recommendation — the Highways Authority should liaise with local farmers to
identify reasonable measures that can be put in place fo.avoid any future
excessive mud deposits on the road surface. ‘J

Traffic Management Officer.

Page 11 of 11
Also filed under 2014-0435: Rooke-2014-0435a.pdf
DAVID W. G. RIDLEY
Senior Coroner for Wiltshire and Swindon

REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS

THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO:

1. BB one Farm, Heddington, Calne, Wiltshire SN11 8RE

2. F Poulshot Lodge Farm, Poulshot, Devizes, Wiltshire SN10 1RQ

CORONER

lam DAVID W. G. RIDLEY, Senior Coroner for Wiltshire and Swindon

CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS

| make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and
regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013.
http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2009/25/schedule/5/paragraph/7
http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2013/1629/part/7/made

INVESTIGATION and INQUEST

On 14/03/2014 | commenced an investigation into the death of Tracy Michelle ROOKE aged 43.
The investigation concluded at the end of the Inquest on 06 October 2014. The conclusion of the
Inquest was that Tracy sustained multiple traumatic injuries as a result of a road traffic collision
that occurred on 13 March 2014 on the A3102 at Mile Elm, Wiltshire.

CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH

The circumstances of her death were that Tracey was travelling south along the A3102 at Mile
Elm having just negotiated a left hand bend when she lost control of her vehicle which then
crossed the centre of the highway before colliding with a van travelling in the opposite direction.
| found that the weather conditions and in particular thick fog and her unfamiliarity with the road
more likely than not contributed to the incident and her death.

CORONER’S CONCERNS

During the course of the Inquest | had cause to hear evidence from i ; Traffic
Management and Road Safety Assessment Officer with Wiltshire Police. | also had the
opportunity to look at his report dated 26 June 2014. The reason for writing to each of you is that
| am informed that the farmyard and land to the rear of Quobbs Farm are let to you and therefore
each of you hav cess onto the A3102 from Quobbs Farm. | have enclosed with this letter
page 9 of A vert which shows photographs of the entrance to Quobbs Farm that were
taken at the time the police were in attendance in relation to Ms Rooke’s death. | wish to stress
now that the mud on the road at this particular location played no part whatsoever in the death of
Ms Rooke.

The above having been said if evidence is presented to a Coroner as part of an Inquest process
irrespective of it being unconnected with the circumstances of that person’s death, a Coroner
can make a Regulation 28 report if he or she has concerns with a view to prevention of future
deaths. | am concerned in relation to the quantity of mud visible in the photographs and also as
regards the quality of signage located in such close proximity to the start of the muddied section
of highway. | have dealt with deaths on Wiltshire roads that have involved farm mud on the
highway and | am aware of the hazard it creates. | fully accept farmers have a livelihood to
make however | would ask that you review and inform me of your practice and procedures to

Wiltshire & Swindon Coroner's Office, 26 Endless Street, Salisbury, Wiltshire, SP1 1DP
Tel 01722 438900 | Fax 01722 332223

deal with mud on the highway and as to whether or not in the light of the photographs your
practices could be improved and if so how. You may also like to consider seeking advice from
either the National Farmers Union or Wiltshire Council as Highways Authority.

a
ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN

In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and | believe you have the power
to take such action.

YOUR RESPONSE

You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, namely by
04 December 2014. |, the coroner, may extend the period.

Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the
timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed.

COPIES and PUBLICATION

| have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested Persons:-

a 2° Management and Road Safety Unit

lam also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response.

The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form. He
may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of interest.
You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response, about the
release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner.

Dated 09 October 2014

“YS
Signature

Senior Coroner for Wiltshire and Swindon

Wiltshire & Swindon Coroner's Office, 26 Endiess Street, Salisbury, Wiltshire, SP1 1DP
Tel 01722 438900 | Fax 01722 332223

Other Issues
Other issues a

To the south of the collision scene is an entrance to Quobbs Farm. Photographs 9
and 10 were taken at this entrance on the day of the collision and show a basic sign
stating ‘Caution Mud on road’, with the degree of mud on the road surface.

Photograph 9

Photograph 10

Page 9 of 11

Related reports

Other reports by David Ridley

See all →

More reports categorised “Road (Highways Safety) related deaths”

See all →

Track Road (Highways Safety) related deaths

See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Road (Highways Safety) related deaths, and how often a new one appears.

What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text

Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.

These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.