Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2019
Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2019-0060, written 21 Feb 2019. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.
| Date of report | 21 Feb 2019 |
|---|---|
| Reference | 2019-0060 |
| Deceased | Robert Chandler |
| Coroner | Jacqueline Lake |
| Coroner area | Norfolk |
| Category | Emergency services related deaths (2019 onwards) |
| Organisation named | East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust |
| Source | judiciary.uk record · original PDF |
| Responses published | 1 |
Text recovered by OCR from a scanned PDF. OCR is imperfect: check anything you rely on against the source PDF. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.
REGULATION 28: REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: Chief Executive East of England Ambulance Service Whiting Way Melbourn Cambridgeshire SG8 6EN CORONER | lam JACQUELINE LAKE, Senior Coroner, for the coroner area of NORFOLK CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS | make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. INVESTIGATION and INQUEST On 27 September 2018, | commenced an investigation into the death of ROBERT CHARLES CHANDLER, AGED 85. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 20 FEBRUARY 2019. The conclusion of the inquest was medical cause of death: 1a) Respiratory Failure b) Traumatic Pneumothorax 2. Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Dementia, Ischaemic Heart Disease, Frailty and a Narrative Conclusion: On 24 September 2018, Mr Chandler collapsed and suffered a pneumothorax. An ambulance arrived fifty minutes after the first telephone call was received and Mr Chandler was taken to the James Paget University Hospital where he died on 25 September 2018 from his injury. | CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH On 24 September 2018, Mr Chandler collapsed and suffered a pneumothorax. An ambulance arrived fifty minutes after the first telephone call was received and Mr | Chandler was taken to the James Paget University Hospital where he died on 25 September 2018 from his injury. CORONER’S CONCERNS During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action is taken. In the circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows. — (1) The Mangar Elk inflatable chair was intended to be used to lift Mr Chandler to the ambulance. One section did not inflate and so Mr Chandler was lifted underneath his arms and transferred to a chair borrowed from a local supermarket, no pain relief was given to Mr Chandler before being placed into the ambulance. He was later diagnosed with a pneumothorax. No safety straps were used. (2) Staff are required to ask for assistance when required and are responsible for checking equipment daily. The evidence is that this is not always done. (3) An electronic tablet was used initially to record the incident but this was not sufficiently charged to record all information. Paper records were not adequately completed. (4) The incident occurred in September 2018 and the internal investigation report with recommendations was completed in January 2019. Recommendations within the Report and in particular a clinical debrief had not taken place at the time of inquest (February 2019) | ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and | believe your organisation has the power to take such action. YOUR RESPONSE You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, namely by 18 April 2019, the coroner, may extend the period. | Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out | the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed. COPIES and PUBLICATION | have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested Persons: wife) on) lam also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response. The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of interest. You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response, about the release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner. 21 February 2019 —_ “ Jacqueline Lake | Senior Coroner Norfolk Coroner Service Carrow House, 301 King Street | Norwich, NR1 2TN
1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.
NHS East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust Headquarters Melbourn Ambulance Station Whiting Way Melbourn Cambridgeshire SG8 6NA 16 April 2019 FAO: Jacqueline Lake Senior Coroner for Norfolk Dear Ms Lake | am writing in relation to the inquest into the death of Robert Chandler, which took place on 20" February 2019, and the Regulation 28 Report to Prevent Future Deaths you sent to the Trust dated 21 February 2019. | understand that you called Chris Hewetson, the Trust’s AOC Business Continuity and Patient Experience Manager to give evidence on behalf of the Trust and he was accompanied by Philip Sweeney, Area Clinical Lead. Within your report you have identified four areas of concern: e The Mangar Elk inflatable chair was intended to be used to lift Mr Chandler to the ambulance. One section did not inflate and so Mr Chandler was lifted underneath his arms and transferred to a chair borrowed from a local supermarket, no pain relief was given to Mr Chandler before being placed into the ambulance. He was later diagnosed with a pneumothorax. No safety straps were used. e Staff are required to ask for assistance when required and are responsible for checking that equipment is present at the start of each shift. The evidence is that this is not always done as during periods of extreme demand, a crew may be allocated and sent to an incident before the check is completed. e Anelectronic tablet was used initially to record the incident but this was not sufficiently charged to record all information. Paper records were not adequately completed. e The incident occurred in September 2018 and the _ internal investigation report with recommendations was completed in January 2019. Recommendations within the report and in particular a clinical debrief had not taken place at the time of the inquest (February 2019). Although | appreciate these did not contribute to Mr Chandler's death, | welcome the opportunity to address these issues and have done so below: Mangar Elk malfunction The Mangar Elk equipment is used by staff in order to assist patients who have fallen. All devices are serviced on an annual basis in line with the manufacturer guidelines. If a fault is detected then it is managed in line with our Medical Devices Policy and either reported on our incident reporting system or tagged as faulty. It is then assessed by our Clinical Engineering Department and fixed as required. Interim Chief Executive: Dorothy Hosein Chair: Sarah Boulton www.eastamb.nhs.uk You will appreciate that equipment can malfunction at times and we do have a process in place in order to manage these issues. Unfortunately on this occasion the individual did not raise an incident at the time, although | can confirm the equipment was identified as faulty and fixed. | will ensure that further investigation takes place in relation to the clinician's statement that the equipment malfunction was reported as an incident. In terms of your comments regarding pain relief and safety straps, Entonox is not indicated with potential chest injuries so IV cannulation would be needed to administer the drug. The crew felt to do this they would need to take many layers of clothes off the patient in a cold outside area and it was more appropriate to complete when in the ambulance. The Mangar Elk piece of equipment does not have safety straps attached to it as the safety element is managed by the attending ambulance staff. Vehicle/equipment daily checks The Trust has a process in place for vehicle/equipment daily checks to take place before the start of every shift. The vehicle daily checklist is completed by the crew and identifies any issues with the equipment on the vehicle. There are some exceptions to this if the crew are required to attend to the call immediately, however the general practice is to complete a vehicle daily check prior to the start of shift. It should also be noted that although a check list would identify that this particular piece of equipment is on the vehicle, it would not be practicable to test the function during this check due to the time taken to both inflate and deflate the device prior to responding to any incidents awaiting attendance ePCR failure The Trust encourages all staff to complete electronic Patient Care Records however there are times when this is not possible due to the nature of the incident or if there are technology issues. To ensure this does not impact on patient care, the ambulances are all stocked with paper Patient Care Records and a paper record was completed on this occasion: | can assure you this did not impact on the quality of care provided to the patient at that point in time. Unfortunately, the paper record was not completed to the standards the Trust details within the Patient Records Policy and this has already been addressed with the member of staff and formed part of the clinical debrief, which took place on 6" March 2019. Timeliness of clinical debrief The Trust endeavours to complete all actions arising from Serious Incidents as soon as possible and we currently have a team who are focussing on the quality of incident investigations and also monitoring actions from incidents. The Trust has recently appointed to a Patient Safety Integration Lead in order to better embed learning from both internal investigations or concerns and external best practice. This is in its infancy but will support timely closure of actions from Sls, investigations and patient experiences which we hope will provide assurance that lessons will be learned in a more timely way. The clinical debrief has now taken place and the Area Clinical Lead who supported this advises the crew were very moved by the family’s written statement and learning has taken place around ensuring good communication with everyone. | understand you also had concerns about delays, ambulance resources and recruitment however you were satisfied with the responses that Chris provided in relation to these issues. However if you have any further queries, please let me know. The Trust’s Acting Chief Operating Officer, a... be happy to meet with you to discuss any of the issues in this letter or any other matters. Please let me know if you would like me to arrange this. Please do not hesitate to contact me should you require any further information. Yours sincerely — oe » Loe—_—_— Dorothy Hosein Interim Chief Executive Interim Chief Executive: Dorothy Hosein Chair: Sarah Boulton www.eastamb.nhs.uk
See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust, and how often a new one appears.
What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text
Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.
These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.